Literature DB >> 23269578

A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein-ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function.

Nadine Schneider1, Gudrun Lange, Sally Hindle, Robert Klein, Matthias Rarey.   

Abstract

The estimation of free energy of binding is a key problem in structure-based design. We developed the scoring function HYDE based on a consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein-ligand complexes. HYDE is applicable to all types of protein targets since it is not calibrated on experimental binding affinity data or protein-ligand complexes. The comprehensible atom-based score of HYDE is visualized by applying a very intuitive coloring scheme, thereby facilitating the analysis of protein-ligand complexes in the lead optimization process. In this paper, we have revised several aspects of the former version of HYDE which was described in detail previously. The revised HYDE version was already validated in large-scale redocking and screening experiments which were performed in the course of the Docking and Scoring Symposium at 241st ACS National Meeting. In this study, we additionally evaluate the ability of the revised HYDE version to predict binding affinities. On the PDBbind 2007 coreset, HYDE achieves a correlation coefficient of 0.62 between the experimental binding constants and the predicted binding energy, performing second best on this dataset compared to 17 other well-established scoring functions. Further, we show that the performance of HYDE in large-scale redocking and virtual screening experiments on the Astex diverse set and the DUD dataset respectively, is comparable to the best methods in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23269578     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9626-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  43 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test.

Authors:  John W Liebeschuetz; Jason C Cole; Oliver Korb
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Substantial improvements in large-scale redocking and screening using the novel HYDE scoring function.

Authors:  Nadine Schneider; Sally Hindle; Gudrun Lange; Robert Klein; Jürgen Albrecht; Hans Briem; Kristin Beyer; Holger Claußen; Marcus Gastreich; Christian Lemmen; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  NAOMI: on the almost trivial task of reading molecules from different file formats.

Authors:  Sascha Urbaczek; Adrian Kolodzik; J Robert Fischer; Tobias Lippert; Stefan Heuser; Inken Groth; Tanja Schulz-Gasch; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Rapid context-dependent ligand desolvation in molecular docking.

Authors:  Michael M Mysinger; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide.

Authors:  Matthew P Repasky; Robert B Murphy; Jay L Banks; Jeremy R Greenwood; Ivan Tubert-Brohman; Sathesh Bhat; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids.

Authors:  M L Connolly
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  47 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of several docking tools for docking small molecule ligands to DC-SIGN.

Authors:  Gregor Jug; Marko Anderluh; Tihomir Tomašič
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Extended solvent-contact model approach to blind SAMPL5 prediction challenge for the distribution coefficients of drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Kee-Choo Chung; Hwangseo Park
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Predicting the affinity of Farnesoid X Receptor ligands through a hierarchical ranking protocol: a D3R Grand Challenge 2 case study.

Authors:  Manon Réau; Florent Langenfeld; Jean-François Zagury; Matthieu Montes
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  In vivo anti-malarial activity of the hydroalcoholic extract of rhizomes of Kniphofia foliosa and its constituents.

Authors:  Yonatan Alebachew; Daniel Bisrat; Solomon Tadesse; Kaleab Asres
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Mouse Siglec-1 Mediates trans-Infection of Surface-bound Murine Leukemia Virus in a Sialic Acid N-Acyl Side Chain-dependent Manner.

Authors:  Elina Erikson; Paul R Wratil; Martin Frank; Ina Ambiel; Katharina Pahnke; Maria Pino; Parastoo Azadi; Nuria Izquierdo-Useros; Javier Martinez-Picado; Chris Meier; Ronald L Schnaar; Paul R Crocker; Werner Reutter; Oliver T Keppler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Druggability assessment of mammalian Per-Arnt-Sim [PAS] domains using computational approaches.

Authors:  João V de Souza; Sylvia Reznikov; Ruidi Zhu; Agnieszka K Bronowska
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.597

7.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson; Richard D Smith; Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Jeanne A Stuckey; Aqeel Ahmed; Maire A Convery; Donald O Somers; Michael Kranz; Patricia A Elkins; Guanglei Cui; Catherine E Peishoff; Millard H Lambert; James B Dunbar
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  ClogP(alk): a method for predicting alkane/water partition coefficient.

Authors:  Peter W Kenny; Carlos A Montanari; Igor M Prokopczyk
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein-ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Priscila da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes; Franck Da Silva; Guillaume Bret; Didier Rognan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.