Literature DB >> 23530568

Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.

Khaled M Elokely1, Robert J Doerksen.   

Abstract

Computational tools are essential in the drug design process, especially in order to take advantage of the increasing numbers of solved X-ray and NMR protein-ligand structures. Nowadays, molecular docking methods are routinely used for prediction of protein-ligand interactions and to aid in selecting potent molecules as a part of virtual screening of large databases. The improvements and advances in computational capacity in the past decade have allowed for further developments in molecular docking algorithms to address more complicated aspects such as protein flexibility. The effects of incorporation of active site water molecules and implicit or explicit solvation of the binding site are other relevant issues to be addressed in the docking procedures. Using the right docking algorithm at the right stage of virtual screening is most important. We report a staged study to address the effects of various aspects of protein flexibility and inclusion of active site water molecules on docking effectiveness to retrieve (and to be able to predict) correct ligand poses and to rank docked ligands in relation to their biological activity for CHK1, ERK2, LpxC, and UPA. We generated multiple conformers for the ligand and compared different docking algorithms that use a variety of approaches to protein flexibility, including rigid receptor, soft receptor, flexible side chains, induced fit, and multiple structure algorithms. Docking accuracy varied from 1% to 84%, demonstrating that the choice of method is important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23530568      PMCID: PMC3755091          DOI: 10.1021/ci400040d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  51 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes: enrichment of known inhibitors in large-scale virtual screening.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; John J Irwin; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-02-01

Review 6.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Induced-fit docking approach provides insight into the binding mode and mechanism of action of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Barreca; Nunzio Iraci; Laura De Luca; Alba Chimirri
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Species-specific and inhibitor-dependent conformations of LpxC: implications for antibiotic design.

Authors:  Chul-Jin Lee; Xiaofei Liang; Xin Chen; Daina Zeng; Sang Hoon Joo; Hak Suk Chung; Adam W Barb; Shauna M Swanson; Robert A Nicholas; Yaoxian Li; Eric J Toone; Christian R H Raetz; Pei Zhou
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2010-12-16
View more
  30 in total

1.  NMR reveals structural rearrangements associated to substrate insertion in nucleotide-adding enzymes.

Authors:  Biswaranjan Mohanty; Michael Geralt; Kurt Wüthrich; Pedro Serrano
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Targeting the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2D4 for cancer drug discovery-a structure-based approach.

Authors:  Vishwanath Ramatenki; Ramakrishna Dumpati; Rajender Vadija; Santhiprada Vellanki; Sarita Rajender Potlapally; Rohini Rondla; Uma Vuruputuri
Journal:  J Chem Biol       Date:  2016-12-24

3.  Octopus: a platform for the virtual high-throughput screening of a pool of compounds against a set of molecular targets.

Authors:  Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia; Vinícius Alves Campos; Bianca Dos Reis Santos; Marina Santos Costa; Iann Gabriel Lima; Sandro J Greco; Rosy I M A Ribeiro; Felipe M Munayer; Alisson Marques da Silva; Alex Gutterres Taranto
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Uncovering New Drug Properties in Target-Based Drug-Drug Similarity Networks.

Authors:  Lucreţia Udrescu; Paul Bogdan; Aimée Chiş; Ioan Ovidiu Sîrbu; Alexandru Topîrceanu; Renata-Maria Văruţ; Mihai Udrescu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  Understanding TRPV1 activation by ligands: Insights from the binding modes of capsaicin and resiniferatoxin.

Authors:  Khaled Elokely; Phanindra Velisetty; Lucie Delemotte; Eugene Palovcak; Michael L Klein; Tibor Rohacs; Vincenzo Carnevale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Essential Dynamics Ensemble Docking for Structure-Based GPCR Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Kyle McKay; Nicholas B Hamilton; Jacob M Remington; Severin T Schneebeli; Jianing Li
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 7.  Virtual screening of substances used in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and analysis of compounds with known action on structurally similar proteins from other viruses.

Authors:  Paul Andrei Negru; Denisa Claudia Miculas; Tapan Behl; Alexa Florina Bungau; Ruxandra-Cristina Marin; Simona Gabriela Bungau
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 7.419

8.  Evaluation of antiplasmodial activity in silico and in vitro of N-acylhydrazone derivatives.

Authors:  Fernanda A Oliveira; Ana Claudia S Pinto; Caique L Duarte; Alex G Taranto; Eder Lorenzato Junior; Cleydson Finotti Cordeiro; Diogo T Carvalho; Fernando P Varotti; Amanda L Fonseca
Journal:  BMC Chem       Date:  2022-07-09

9.  Computational identification of 2,4-disubstituted amino-pyrimidines as L858R/T790M-EGFR double mutant inhibitors using pharmacophore mapping, molecular docking, binding free energy calculation, DFT study and molecular dynamic simulation.

Authors:  Rahul Pawara; Iqrar Ahmad; Sanjay Surana; Harun Patel
Journal:  In Silico Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-06

10.  NOD: a web server to predict New use of Old Drugs to facilitate drug repurposing.

Authors:  Tarun Jairaj Narwani; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan; Sohini Chakraborti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.