Literature DB >> 20882397

pK(a) based protonation states and microspecies for protein-ligand docking.

Tim ten Brink1, Thomas E Exner.   

Abstract

In this paper we present our reworked approach to generate ligand protonation states with our structure preparation tool SPORES (Structure PrOtonation and REcognition System). SPORES can be used for the preprocessing of proteins and protein-ligand complexes as e.g. taken from the Protein Data Bank as well as for the setup of 3D ligand databases. It automatically assigns atom and bond types, generates different protonation, tautomeric states as well as different stereoisomers. In the revised version, pKa calculations with the ChemAxon software MARVIN are used either to determine the likeliness of a combinatorial generated protonation state or to determine the titrable atoms used in the combinatorial approach. Additionally, the MARVIN software is used to predict microspecies distributions of ligand molecules. Docking studies were performed with our recently introduced program PLANTS (Protein-Ligand ANT System) on all protomers resulting from the three different selection methods for the well established CCDC/ASTEX clean data set demonstrating the usefulness of especially the latter approach.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882397     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-010-9385-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  29 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.

Authors:  Esther Kellenberger; Jordi Rodrigo; Pascal Muller; Didier Rognan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-01

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Tautomers and topomers: challenging the uncertainties of direct physicochemical modeling.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Tautomerism, Hammett sigma, and QSAR.

Authors:  Yvonne Connolly Martin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Tautomers and reference 3D-structures: the orphans of in silico drug design.

Authors:  Timothy Clark
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  Warfarin: history, tautomerism and activity.

Authors:  William R Porter
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Combinatorial-computational-chemoinformatics (C3) approach to finding and analyzing low-energy tautomers.

Authors:  Maciej Haranczyk; Maciej Gutowski
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  So you think you understand tautomerism?

Authors:  Roger A Sayle
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  19 in total

1.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Site-specific basicities regulate molecular recognition in receptor binding: in silico docking of thyroid hormones.

Authors:  Gergő Tóth; Ferenc Baska; András Schretner; Akos Rácz; Béla Noszál
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 3.  Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Understanding TRPV1 activation by ligands: Insights from the binding modes of capsaicin and resiniferatoxin.

Authors:  Khaled Elokely; Phanindra Velisetty; Lucie Delemotte; Eugene Palovcak; Michael L Klein; Tibor Rohacs; Vincenzo Carnevale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Rational Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Properties of Thiophene Derivatives That Inhibit Bacterial Histidine Kinases.

Authors:  Thibaut Boibessot; Christopher P Zschiedrich; Alexandre Lebeau; David Bénimèlis; Catherine Dunyach-Rémy; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Hendrik Szurmant; Zohra Benfodda; Patrick Meffre
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  One Step Beyond: Design of Substrates Spanning Primed Positions of Zika Virus NS2B-NS3 Protease.

Authors:  Natalia Gruba; Jose Ignacio Rodriguez Martinez; Renata Grzywa; Magdalena Wysocka; Marcin Skoreński; Agnieszka Dabrowska; Maria Łęcka; Piotr Suder; Marcin Sieńczyk; Krzysztof Pyrc; Adam Lesner
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  Rigorous incorporation of tautomers, ionization species, and different binding modes into ligand-based and receptor-based 3D-QSAR methods.

Authors:  Senthil Natesan; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

8.  Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Marco A C Neves; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Discovery of Novel CCR5 Ligands as Anticolorectal Cancer Agents by Sequential Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Mariam A El-Zohairy; Darius P Zlotos; Martin R Berger; Hassan H Adwan; Yasmine M Mandour
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 10.  Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Qingliang Li; Zhigang Zhou; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.