Literature DB >> 22564229

Time course study of delayed wound healing in a biofilm-challenged diabetic mouse model.

Ge Zhao1, Marcia L Usui, Robert A Underwood, Pradeep K Singh, Garth A James, Philip S Stewart, Philip Fleckman, John E Olerud.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilm has been shown to play a role in delaying wound healing of chronic wounds, a major medical problem that results in significant health care burden. A reproducible animal model could be very valuable for studying the mechanism and management of chronic wounds. Our previous work showed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1) biofilm challenge on wounds in diabetic (db/db) mice significantly delayed wound healing. In this wound time course study, we further characterize the bacterial burden, delayed wound healing, and certain aspects of the host inflammatory response in the PAO1 biofilm-challenged db/db mouse model. PAO1 biofilms were transferred onto 2-day-old wounds created on the dorsal surface of db/db mice. Control wounds without biofilm challenge healed by 4 weeks, consistent with previous studies; none of the biofilm-challenged wounds healed by 4 weeks. Of the biofilm-challenged wounds, 64% healed by 6 weeks, and all of the biofilm-challenged wounds healed by 8 weeks. During the wound-healing process, P. aeruginosa was gradually cleared from the wounds while the presence of Staphylococcus aureus (part of the normal mouse skin flora) increased. Scabs from all unhealed wounds contained 10(7) P. aeruginosa, which was 100-fold higher than the counts isolated from wound beds (i.e., 99% of the P. aeruginosa was in the scab). Histology and genetic analysis showed proliferative epidermis, deficient vascularization, and increased inflammatory cytokines. Hypoxia inducible factor expression increased threefold in 4-week wounds. In summary, our study shows that biofilm-challenged wounds typically heal in approximately 6 weeks, at least 2 weeks longer than nonbiofilm-challenged normal wounds. These data suggest that this delayed wound healing model enables the in vivo study of bacterial biofilm responses to host defenses and the effects of biofilms on host wound healing pathways. It may also be used to test antibiofilm strategies for treating chronic wounds.
© 2012 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22564229      PMCID: PMC3349451          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00793.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  35 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Phillip C Hochwalt; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 3.  Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings.

Authors:  Margaret A Fonder; Gerald S Lazarus; David A Cowan; Barbara Aronson-Cook; Angela R Kohli; Adam J Mamelak
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa pili as ligands for nonopsonic phagocytosis by fibronectin-stimulated macrophages.

Authors:  N M Kelly; J L Kluftinger; B L Pasloske; W Paranchych; R E Hancock
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Characterization of an in vitro model for evaluating the interface between skin and percutaneous biomaterials.

Authors:  Yuko Fukano; Negar G Knowles; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Kip D Hauch; Andrew J Marshall; Buddy D Ratner; Cecilia Giachelli; William G Carter; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Kristine Gjødsbøl; Jens Jørgen Christensen; Tonny Karlsmark; Bo Jørgensen; Bjarke M Klein; Karen A Krogfelt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Expression of MMP1 in surgical and radiation-impaired wound healing and its effects on the healing process.

Authors:  Qingyang Gu; Dewen Wang; Yabing Gao; Jie Zhou; Ruiyun Peng; Yufang Cui; Guowei Xia; Quanhong Qing; Hong Yang; Jie Liu; Meilan Zhao
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.567

Review 8.  Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis.

Authors:  Thomas Bjarnsholt; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Peter Østrup Jensen; Kit G Madsen; Richard Phipps; Karen Krogfelt; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  The clinical significance of bacterial growth in venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  G Eriksson; A E Eklund; L O Kallings
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1984

10.  Polymicrobial nature of chronic diabetic foot ulcer biofilm infections determined using bacterial tag encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP).

Authors:  Scot E Dowd; Randall D Wolcott; Yan Sun; Trevor McKeehan; Ethan Smith; Daniel Rhoads
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms and Wounds: An Overview of the Evidence.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Sara M McCarty; Benjamin Lipsky
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Chronic Wound Biofilm Model.

Authors:  Kasturi Ganesh; Mithun Sinha; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Amitava Das; Sashwati Roy; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Clinical Biofilms: A Challenging Frontier in Wound Care.

Authors:  Jennifer Hurlow; Kara Couch; Karen Laforet; Laura Bolton; Daniel Metcalf; Phil Bowler
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  D-amino acids enhance the activity of antimicrobials against biofilms of clinical wound isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Carlos J Sanchez; Kevin S Akers; Desiree R Romano; Ronald L Woodbury; Sharanda K Hardy; Clinton K Murray; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm hampers murine central wound healing by suppression of vascular epithelial growth factor.

Authors:  Hannah Trøstrup; Christian J Lerche; Lars J Christophersen; Kim Thomsen; Peter Ø Jensen; Hans Petter Hougen; Niels Høiby; Claus Moser
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A Cooperative Copper Metal-Organic Framework-Hydrogel System Improves Wound Healing in Diabetes.

Authors:  Jisheng Xiao; Siyu Chen; Ji Yi; Hao Zhang; Guillermo A Ameer
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses T3SS to inhibit diabetic wound healing.

Authors:  Josef Goldufsky; Stephen J Wood; Vijayakumar Jayaraman; Omar Majdobeh; Lin Chen; Shanshan Qin; Chunxiang Zhang; Luisa A DiPietro; Sasha H Shafikhani
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 8.  Beyond conventional antibiotics - New directions for combination products to combat biofilm.

Authors:  Danir Fanisovich Bayramov; Jennifer Ann Neff
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Microsensor and transcriptomic signatures of oxygen depletion in biofilms associated with chronic wounds.

Authors:  Garth A James; Alice Ge Zhao; Marcia Usui; Robert A Underwood; Hung Nguyen; Haluk Beyenal; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Alessandra Agostinho Hunt; Hans C Bernstein; Philip Fleckman; John Olerud; Kerry S Williamson; Michael J Franklin; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 10.  Biofilm models of polymicrobial infection.

Authors:  Rebecca A Gabrilska; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.