Literature DB >> 24841260

D-amino acids enhance the activity of antimicrobials against biofilms of clinical wound isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Carlos J Sanchez1, Kevin S Akers2, Desiree R Romano3, Ronald L Woodbury3, Sharanda K Hardy3, Clinton K Murray4, Joseph C Wenke3.   

Abstract

Within wounds, microorganisms predominantly exist as biofilms. Biofilms are associated with chronic infections and represent a tremendous clinical challenge. As antibiotics are often ineffective against biofilms, use of dispersal agents as adjunctive, topical therapies for the treatment of wound infections involving biofilms has gained interest. We evaluated in vitro the dispersive activity of D-amino acids (D-AAs) on biofilms from clinical wound isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; moreover, we determined whether combinations of D-AAs and antibiotics (clindamycin, cefazolin, oxacillin, rifampin, and vancomycin for S. aureus and amikacin, colistin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, and ceftazidime for P. aeruginosa) enhance activity against biofilms. D-Met, D-Phe, and D-Trp at concentrations of ≥ 5 mM effectively dispersed preformed biofilms of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, an effect that was enhanced when they were combined as an equimolar mixture (D-Met/D-Phe/D-Trp). When combined with D-AAs, the activity of rifampin was significantly enhanced against biofilms of clinical isolates of S. aureus, as indicated by a reduction in the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) (from 32 to 8 μg/ml) and a >2-log reduction of viable biofilm bacteria compared to treatment with antibiotic alone. The addition of D-AAs was also observed to enhance the activity of colistin and ciprofloxacin against biofilms of P. aeruginosa, reducing the observed MBIC and the number of viable bacteria by >2 logs and 1 log at 64 and 32 μg/ml in contrast to antibiotics alone. These findings indicate that the biofilm dispersal activity of D-AAs may represent an effective strategy, in combination with antimicrobials, to release bacteria from biofilms, subsequently enhancing antimicrobial activity.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841260      PMCID: PMC4136027          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02468-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  50 in total

1.  Introduction to biofilm.

Authors:  J W Costerton
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  B W HOLLOWAY
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1955-12

3.  Biofilms in chronic wounds.

Authors:  Garth A James; Ellen Swogger; Randall Wolcott; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Patrick Secor; Jennifer Sestrich; John W Costerton; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings.

Authors:  Margaret A Fonder; Gerald S Lazarus; David A Cowan; Barbara Aronson-Cook; Angela R Kohli; Adam J Mamelak
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; K Newton; D Blough; D K McCulloch; N Sandhu; G E Reiber; E H Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Characterization of a rabbit model of staphylococcal osteomyelitis.

Authors:  M S Smeltzer; J R Thomas; S G Hickmon; R A Skinner; C L Nelson; D Griffith; T R Parr; R P Evans
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis.

Authors:  Thomas Bjarnsholt; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Peter Østrup Jensen; Kit G Madsen; Richard Phipps; Karen Krogfelt; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Carlos Ricotti; Alex Cazzaniga; Esperanza Welsh; William H Eaglstein; Patricia M Mertz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing.

Authors:  Scot E Dowd; Yan Sun; Patrick R Secor; Daniel D Rhoads; Benjamin M Wolcott; Garth A James; Randall D Wolcott
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Blaise R Boles; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  31 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Does Suture Type Influence Bacterial Retention and Biofilm Formation After Irrigation in a Mouse Model?

Authors:  Daniel J Stinner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Advances in the treatment of problematic industrial biofilms.

Authors:  D Xu; R Jia; Y Li; T Gu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Quantifying the natural history of biofilm formation in vivo during the establishment of chronic implant-associated Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in mice to identify critical pathogen and host factors.

Authors:  Kohei Nishitani; Werasak Sutipornpalangkul; Karen L de Mesy Bentley; John J Varrone; Sheila N Bello-Irizarry; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda; Stephen L Kates; John L Daiss; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Peptidoglycomics reveals compositional changes in peptidoglycan between biofilm- and planktonic-derived Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Erin M Anderson; David Sychantha; Dyanne Brewer; Anthony J Clarke; Jennifer Geddes-McAlister; Cezar M Khursigara
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Bacterial d-amino acids suppress sinonasal innate immunity through sweet taste receptors in solitary chemosensory cells.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Benjamin M Hariri; Derek B McMahon; Bei Chen; Laurel Doghramji; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; David W Kennedy; Peihua Jiang; Robert F Margolskee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.192

6.  Phosphatidylcholine Coatings Deliver Local Antimicrobials and Reduce Infection in a Murine Model: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Michael A Harris; Karen E Beenken; Mark S Smeltzer; Warren O Haggard; J Amber Jennings
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Cephalosporin-3'-Diazeniumdiolate NO Donor Prodrug PYRRO-C3D Enhances Azithromycin Susceptibility of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae Biofilms.

Authors:  Samuel A Collins; Michael J Kelso; Ardeshir Rineh; Nageshwar R Yepuri; Janice Coles; Claire L Jackson; Georgia D Halladay; Woolf T Walker; Jeremy S Webb; Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Gary J Connett; Martin Feelisch; Saul N Faust; Jane S A Lucas; Raymond N Allan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Therapeutics and delivery vehicles for local treatment of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Leah H Cobb; Emily M McCabe; Lauren B Priddy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Antibiotic-loaded phosphatidylcholine inhibits staphylococcal bone infection.

Authors:  Jessica Amber Jennings; Karen E Beenken; Robert A Skinner; Daniel G Meeker; Mark S Smeltzer; Warren O Haggard; Karen S Troxel
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-08-18

10.  D-Tryptophan governs biofilm formation rates and bacterial interaction in P. mendocina and S. aureus.

Authors:  Saheli Ghosh; Asifa Qureshi; Hemantj Purohit
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.