| Literature DB >> 22563446 |
Yun-wei Dong1, Hai-shan Wang, Guo-Dong Han, Cai-huan Ke, Xin Zhan, Tomoyuki Nakano, Gray A Williams.
Abstract
AIM: Genetic data were used to measure the phylogeographic distribution of the limpet, Cellana toreuma along the China coast in order to acsertain impacts of historic events, ocean currents and especially freshwater discharge from the Yangtze River on the connectivity of intertidal species with limited larval dispersal capability. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22563446 PMCID: PMC3338569 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Collection sites and environmental conditions.
Collection sites for Cellana toreuma and summer ocean currents along the China coast. CCC, China Coastal Current; YSWC, Yellow Sea Warm Current; TWC, Taiwan Warm Current [55]. The shaded area represents the estimated land area during the LGM [45]. Inset: Sea surface salinity in Yangtze River Estuary in summer [55].
Collection sites, sample size, allocated geographic group and summary of molecular diversity for Cellana toreuma collected along the coast of China.
| ID | Site | Sample size | No. of haplotypes | Nucleotide diversity (π, Mean ± S.D.) | Gene diversity ( | Group |
| QD | Qingdao (36°07′N, 120°36′E) | 21 | 3 (71% 23% | 0.00080±0.00081 | 0.45±0.10 | YS |
| DGD | Dagongdao (36°02N′ 120°13′E) | 30 | 5 (67% 23% | 0.00096±0.00089 | 0.51±0.08 | YS |
| SS | Shengshan (30°07′N 121°55E) | 15 | 3 (86%) | 0.00022±0.00040 | 0.26±0.14 | ECS |
| ZS | Zhoushan (29°57′N 122°12′E) | 52 | 5 (90%) | 0.00032±0.00046 | 0.18±0.07 | ECS |
| NJ | Nanjiliedao (27°33′N 120°41′E) | 30 | 5 (86%) | 0.00056±0.00064 | 0.25±0.10 | ECS |
| PT | Pingtan (25°27′N 119°48′E) | 29 | 3 (93%) | 0.00023±0.00039 | 0.14±0.08 | ECS |
| NRD | Nanridao (25°14′N 119°27′E) | 32 | 4 (90%) | 0.00032±0.00046 | 0.18±0.09 | ECS |
| MZD | Meizhoudao (25°14′N 119°09′E) | 24 | 4 (87%) | 0.00028±0.00044 | 0.24±0.11 | ECS |
| CW | Chongwu (24°53′N 118°56′E) | 32 | 4 (91%) | 0.00032±0.00046 | 0.18±0.09 | ECS |
| XM | Xiamen (24°25′N 118°08′E) | 32 | 5 (87%) | 0.00042±0.00054 | 0.25±0.10 | ECS |
| DS | Dongshan (23°43′N 117°32′E) | 32 | 2 (97%) | 0.00011±0.00026 | 0.06±0.06 | ECS |
| NA | Nanao (23°26′N 117°00′E) | 30 | 4 (90%) | 0.00034±0.00048 | 0.19±0.10 | ECS |
| SZ | Shenzhen (22°32′N 114°13′E) | 14 | 2(86% 14% | 0.00044±0.00058 | 0.26±0.14 | SCS |
| HK | Hong Kong (22°17′N 144°10′E) | 31 | 3 (90%) | 0.00032±0.00046 | 0.19±0.09 | SCS |
| WZD | Weizhoudao (21°26′N 109°03′E) | 14 | 2 (92%) | 0.00048±0.00061 | 0.14±0.12 | SCS |
Values in the parentheses are the percentages of haplotype 1 in the populations;
percentages of haplotype no. 2 in QD and DGD populations;
percentages of haplotype no. 10 in SZ populations.
Based on the geographical locations, these populations were divided into three groups. YS, ECS and SCS represent populations from Yellow Sea, East China Sea and South China Sea, respectively.
Measures of genetic diversity and divergence for 15 population and three groups based on haplotype frequencies using CONTRIB 1.02 (see Table 1 for site and group abbreviations).
| Samplesize | Nb Hap |
|
| r(13) | DHs | DHt | DGst | Ct | Cs | Cd | Cr t | Cr s | Cr d | |
| Population levels | ||||||||||||||
| CW | 32 | 4 | 0.181 | 0.090 | 1.219 | 0.207 | 0.211 | 0.018 | −0.017 | −0.014 | −0.003 | −0.111 | −0.004 | −0.106 |
| DG | 30 | 5 | 0.515 | 0.089 | 2.290 | 0.362 | 0.404 | 0.104 | 0.108 | 0.086 | 0.022 | −0.008 | 0.046 | −0.054 |
| DS | 32 | 2 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.406 | 0.152 | 0.160 | 0.056 | −0.05 | −0.050 | 0.000 | −0.155 | −0.042 | −0.113 |
| SS | 15 | 3 | 0.257 | 0.142 | 1.733 | 0.242 | 0.242 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.009 | −0.005 | −0.062 | 0.02 | −0.081 |
| ZS | 52 | 5 | 0.184 | 0.072 | 1.191 | 0.208 | 0.213 | 0.022 | −0.016 | −0.013 | −0.002 | −0.106 | −0.006 | −0.100 |
| NJ | 30 | 5 | 0.253 | 0.104 | 1.733 | 0.24 | 0.242 | 0.010 | 0.003 | 0.007 | −0.004 | −0.085 | 0.02 | −0.105 |
| NR | 32 | 4 | 0.181 | 0.09 | 1.219 | 0.207 | 0.211 | 0.018 | −0.017 | −0.014 | −0.003 | −0.111 | −0.004 | −0.106 |
| HK | 30 | 3 | 0.131 | 0.082 | 0.867 | 0.183 | 0.189 | 0.029 | −0.031 | −0.029 | −0.002 | −0.127 | −0.021 | −0.106 |
| WZ | 14 | 2 | 0.143 | 0.119 | 0.929 | 0.189 | 0.193 | 0.020 | −0.029 | −0.026 | −0.003 | −0.098 | −0.018 | −0.080 |
| XM | 32 | 5 | 0.238 | 0.099 | 1.625 | 0.233 | 0.236 | 0.013 | −0.001 | 0.003 | −0.003 | −0.087 | 0.015 | −0.102 |
| SZ | 14 | 2 | 0.264 | 0.136 | 1.000 | 0.245 | 0.250 | 0.021 | 0.008 | 0.011 | −0.002 | −0.062 | −0.015 | −0.047 |
| MZ | 24 | 4 | 0.239 | 0.113 | 1.625 | 0.234 | 0.236 | 0.009 | −0.001 | 0.003 | −0.004 | −0.09 | 0.015 | −0.105 |
| PT | 29 | 3 | 0.135 | 0.085 | 0.897 | 0.185 | 0.190 | 0.026 | −0.030 | −0.028 | −0.002 | −0.126 | −0.019 | −0.106 |
| QD | 21 | 3 | 0.452 | 0.105 | 1.616 | 0.333 | 0.364 | 0.087 | 0.082 | 0.067 | 0.015 | −0.028 | 0.014 | −0.042 |
| NA | 30 | 4 | 0.193 | 0.095 | 1.300 | 0.212 | 0.216 | 0.016 | −0.014 | −0.011 | −0.003 | −0.106 | 0.000 | −0.105 |
| Group level | ||||||||||||||
| YS group | 51 | 5 | 0.481 | 0.068 | 3.619 | 0.344 | 0.388 | 0.115 | 0.372 | 0.279 | 0.093 | −0.004 | −0.029 | 0.025 |
| ECS group | 295 | 25 | 0.193 | 0.031 | 4.135 | 0.272 | 0.295 | 0.077 | −0.201 | −0.160 | −0.041 | 0.035 | 0.025 | 0.010 |
| SCS group | 43 | 5 | 0.220 | 0.083 | 3.930 | 0.279 | 0.300 | 0.070 | −0.170 | −0.119 | −0.052 | −0.104 | 0.004 | −0.108 |
Figure 2Haplotype frequencies of COI mtDNA.
Haplotype frequencies of partial COI mtDNA from 15 populations of Cellana toreuma. In each circle, blue and red represent the proportions of H1 and H2, respectively. Inset: Neighbour-joining tree of partial COI mtDNA of the three groups (see Table 1 for population code).
Pairwise genetic distances between populations of Cellana toreuma separated into the Yellow Sea, East China Sea and South China Sea groups along the China coast1.
| YS group | ECS group | SCS group | |
| YS group | 0.18991 | 0.12820 | |
| ECS group | <0.000001 | 0.00613 | |
| SCS group | <0.000001 | 0.07207 |
The upper matrix shows the Tajima-Nei FST values and the lower matrix shows the P values.
Analysis of molecular variation for samples of Cellana toreuma along the China coast to investigate genetic differences in different levels.
| Source of variation | d. f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of Variation | Fixation Index | P value |
| Among Groups | 2 | 2.753 | 0.01439 | 10.90 | 0.10901 | 0.00000 |
| Among populations within groups | 12 | 1.263 | −0.00046 | −0.35 | −0.00391 | 0.51026 |
| Within populations | 403 | 47.53 | 0.11809 | 89.45 | 0.10553 | 0.00000 |
| Total | 417 | 51.604 | 0.13202 |
Figure 3Relationship between genetic distance and geographic distance.
(A) Relationship between genetic distance and geographic distance for all populations; (B) Relationship between genetic distance and geographic distance for populations from the East China Sea and South China Sea groups.
Tajima's D and Fu's Fs, and corresponding P values, and mismatch distribution parameters for 15 populations of Cellana toreuma and their associated groups along the China coast (see Table 1 for site and group abbreviations).
| ID | Tajima's D | Fu's | Mismatch distribution | ||||
| D | P |
| P | τ | θ0 | θ1 | |
| Population level | |||||||
| QD | −0.33029 | 0.31900 | −0.27034 | 0.28100 | 0.60938 | 0 | 99999.00000 |
| DGD | −1.11781 | 0.01560 | −2.13140 | 0.04300 | 0.71875 | 0 | 99999.00000 |
| SS | −1.15945 | 0.17200 | −1.54636 | 0.02000 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.36533 |
| ZS | −1.76473 | 0.01300 | −4.92636 | 0.00000 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.23760 |
| NJ | −2.00763 | 0.00200 | −3.14992 | 0.00200 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.32139 |
| PT | −1.50906 | 0.01500 | −2.31203 | 0.00600 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.16396 |
| NRD | −1.72954 | 0.01400 | −3.48995 | 0.00000 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.23271 |
| MZD | −1.51469 | 0.01500 | −3.02081 | 0.00100 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.33115 |
| CW | −1.72954 | 0.01400 | −3.48995 | 0.00100 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.23271 |
| XM | −1.88876 | 0.01000 | −4.54522 | 0.00000 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.32871 |
| DS | −1.14244 | 0.12000 | −1.26483 | 0.05300 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.06855 |
| NA | −1.73178 | 0.01300 | −3.38072 | 0.00000 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.25225 |
| SZ | −0.34144 | 0.20100 | 0.18574 | 0.30400 | 0.33008 | 0 | 99999.00000 |
| HK | −1.26161 | 0.06800 | −1.70822 | 0.01400 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.24004 |
| WZD | −1.48074 | 0.07300 | 0.29648 | 0.34900 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.10537 |
| Total | |||||||
| Group level | |||||||
| YS group | −0.93178 | 0.01830 | −1.86278 | 0.07700 | 0.66016 | 0 | 99999.00000 |
| ECS group | −2.48839 | 0.00000 | −∞ | 0.00000 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.23271 |
| SCS group | −1.83152 | 0.00400 | −∞ | 0.00100 | 3.00000 | 0 | 0.24004 |
| Total | 0.672 | 0 | 99999.00000 | ||||
Figure 4Observed pairwise differences and expected mismatch distribution.
Observed pairwise differences (bars) and the expected mismatch distributions (line) under the sudden expansion model of COI gene. (A) in all samples, (B) in Yellow Sea group, (C) in East China Sea group and (D) in South China Sea group.