| Literature DB >> 25100169 |
Hai Li1, Hungdu Lin2, Jianlong Li3, Shaoxiong Ding4.
Abstract
The Chinese beard eel (Cirrhimuraena chinensis Kaup) is an intertidal fish and a model organism for the study of impacts caused by topological fluctuations during the Pleistocene and current intricate hydrological conditions on fauna living in the coastal areas of China. In this study, we examined the phylogeographical pattern, population genetic profile and demographical history of C. chinensis using mitochondrial DNA (cytochrome b (cyt b) and control region (CR)) from 266 individuals sampled in seven localities across the coastal area of southeastern China. The combined data indicated high levels of haplotype diversity and low levels of nucleotide diversity. Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) and FST statistics suggested the absence of a significant population structure across the Chinese coast. Neutrality tests, mismatch distributions and Bayesian skyline plots uniformly indicated a recent population expansion. The phylogeographic structure of C. chinensis may be attributed to past population expansion and long-distance pelagic larval dispersal facilitated by present-day ocean currents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25100169 PMCID: PMC4159811 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150813564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Summary of sample size, haplotype numbers, haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π), Tajima’s D, Fu’s Fs, Ramos–Onsins & Rozas’ R2 tests and goodness-of-fit tests for cytochrome b (cyt b), the control region (CR) and cyt b + CR sequences in each population, respectively. SSD, sum of square deviation. * p < 0.05; and ** p < 0.01.
| Populations (Abbreviation) | Sample Size ( | Haplotype Numbers | Haplotype Diversity ( | Nucleotide Diversity (π) | Tajima’s | Fu’s | Ramos–Onsins & Rozas’ | SSD | Raggedness Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 266 | 64 | 0.700 | 0.002 | −2.569 ** | −28.372 ** | 0.010 ** | 0.000 | 0.022 | |
| 266 | 112 | 0.916 | 0.003 | −2.340 ** | −26.782 ** | 0.010 ** | 0.001 | 0.044 | |
| 49 | 45 | 0.997 | 0.003 | −2.164 ** | −25.812 ** | 0.032 ** | 0.008 | 0.033 | |
| 37 | 24 | 0.943 | 0.002 | −2.663 ** | −20.242 ** | 0.035 ** | 0.001 | 0.020 | |
| 30 | 27 | 0.991 | 0.002 | −2.062 ** | −25.791 ** | 0.043 ** | 0.010 | 0.041 | |
| 50 | 36 | 0.964 | 0.002 | −2.521 ** | −26.174 ** | 0.024 ** | 0.001 | 0.025 | |
| 35 | 28 | 0.978 | 0.003 | −1.932 ** | −25.372 ** | 0.044 ** | 0.001 | 0.016 | |
| 37 | 24 | 0.929 | 0.002 | −1.893 ** | −18.808 ** | 0.044 ** | 0.104 | 0.020 | |
| 28 | 7 | 0.915 | 0.002 | −1.808 * | −12.332 ** | 0.057 ** | 0.098 | 0.026 | |
| 266 | 160 | 0.967 | 0.002 | −2.538 ** | −25.652 ** | 0.012 ** | 0.001 | 0.017 |
Matrix of pairwise of FST across seven populations based on cyt b + CR sequences in Cirrhimuraena chinensis.
| cyt | ND | XM | ST | YJ | BH | HK | SY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00216 | |||||||
| −0.00717 | −0.00612 | ||||||
| 0.00359 | −0.00241 | 0.00158 | |||||
| −0.00492 | −0.00350 | −0.01347 | 0.00157 | ||||
| 0.00754 | 0.00423 | −0.00378 | 0.00535 | 0.00391 | |||
| 0.00407 | 0.00458 | −0.00086 | 0.00663 | 0.01164 | 0.01176 |
p values of FST (not presented here) are all greater than 0.05 and 0.01, which means all the FST values in the table above are not statistically significant under p < 0.05 and p < 0.01)
Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) results for testing the genetic subdivision of populations using cyt b + CR sequences across geographic districts.
| cyt | Sum of Squares | Percentage of Variation | Fixation Indices | Significance Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups: Taiwan strait (ND) (XM, ST, YJ, BH, HK, SY) | ||||
| Among groups | 2.178 | 0.18 | ФCT = 0.00182 | |
| Among populations within groups | 9.447 | 0.11 | ФSC = 0.00125 | |
| Within populations | 469.925 | 99.70 | ФST = 0.00297 | |
| Groups: Pearl River (ND, XM, ST) (YJ, BH, HK, SY) | ||||
| Among groups | 1.463 | −0.28 | ФCT = −0.00283 | |
| Among populations within groups | 10.161 | 0.33 | ФSC = 0.00324 | |
| Within populations | 469.925 | 99.96 | ФST = 0.00042 | |
| Groups: Leizhou Peninsula (ND, XM, ST, YJ, HK, SY) (BH) | ||||
| Among groups | 2.010 | 0.09 | ФCT = 0.00085 | |
| Among populations within groups | 9.614 | 0.16 | ФSC = 0.00156 | |
| Within populations | 469.925 | 99.75 | ФST = 0.00242 | |
| Groups: Qiongzhou Strait (ND, XM, ST, YJ, BH) (HK, SY) | ||||
| Among groups | 2.170 | 0.16 | ФCT = 0.00159 | |
| Among populations within groups | 9.454 | 0.11 | ФSC = 0.00110 | |
| Within populations | 469.925 | 99.73 | ФST = 0.00269 | |
Figure 1Mismatch distribution analyses of Cirrhimuraena chinensis Kaup for cyt b, CR and concatenated sequences (cyt b + CR).
Figure 2Bayesian skyline plots of the effective sizes through time for Cirrhimuraena chinensis Kaup based on concatenated sequences (cyt b + CR). The upper and lower limits of the light blue trend represent the 95% confidence intervals of highest posterior densities (HPD) analysis.
Figure 3Map showing the seven sampling sites along the Chinese coast. CCC, China Coastal Current; TWC, Taiwan Warm Current; and GTC, Gulf of Tonkin Current.