| Literature DB >> 20444724 |
Michaël C Fontaine1, Krystal A Tolley, Johan R Michaux, Alexei Birkun, Marisa Ferreira, Thierry Jauniaux, Angela Llavona, Bayram Oztürk, Ayaka A Oztürk, Vincent Ridoux, Emer Rogan, Marina Sequeira, Jean-Marie Bouquegneau, Stuart J E Baird.
Abstract
Recent climate change has triggered profound reorganization in northeast Atlantic ecosystems, with substantial impact on the distribution of marine assemblages from plankton to fishes. However, assessing the repercussions on apex marine predators remains a challenging issue, especially for pelagic species. In this study, we use Bayesian coalescent modelling of microsatellite variation to track the population demographic history of one of the smallest temperate cetaceans, the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in European waters. Combining genetic inferences with palaeo-oceanographic and historical records provides strong evidence that populations of harbour porpoises have responded markedly to the recent climate-driven reorganization in the eastern North Atlantic food web. This response includes the isolation of porpoises in Iberian waters from those further north only approximately 300 years ago with a predominant northward migration, contemporaneous with the warming trend underway since the 'Little Ice Age' period and with the ongoing retreat of cold-water fishes from the Bay of Biscay. The extinction or exodus of harbour porpoises from the Mediterranean Sea (leaving an isolated relict population in the Black Sea) has lacked a coherent explanation. The present results suggest that the fragmentation of harbour distribution range in the Mediterranean Sea was triggered during the warm 'Mid-Holocene Optimum' period (approx. 5000 years ago), by the end of the post-glacial nutrient-rich 'Sapropel' conditions that prevailed before that time.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20444724 PMCID: PMC2981983 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1.Sampling and distribution range of harbour porpoises in European waters. The filled and hatched surfaces indicate the known and the possible distribution range, respectively. The coloured surfaces show the genetically distinct populations identified in Fontaine ): the Black Sea porpoises (red, n = 78), the Iberian porpoises (yellow, n = 31) and the porpoises in northern Bay of Biscay waters (blue, n = 78). The dotted line shows the margin of the continental shelf (isobath −200 m) and the black circles the sampling locations.
Figure 2.Marginal posterior probability densities for each parameter of the IM model. Curves are shown for the analyses comparing harbour porpoise populations from (a–c) Iberian (IB) versus northern Bay of Biscay (NBB), and (d–f) the Black Sea (BS) versus Atlantic (AT). The bottom and top x-axes of plots (a,d) show the time scales converted into calendar years before present (yr BP) using two generation times 5 and 7 years (bottom and top x-axes, respectively). (b) Black line, IB; red line, NBB; green line, ancestral. (c) Migration rate into IB, black line; migration rate into NBB, red line. (e) Black line, BS; red line, AT; green line, ancestral. (f) Migration rate into BS, black line; migration rate into AT, red line.
Maximum-likelihood estimates and 90% HPDIs (between brackets) of parameter estimates under the IM model. (2N1m1 and 2N2m2 are the effective number of migrants per generation, respectively, into population 1 and 2. 1, population 1; 2, population 2; A, ancestral population.)
| parameter | Iberian (1) × northern (2) Bay of Biscay | Black Sea (1) × Atlantic (2) |
|---|---|---|
| 175–245 (55–2079) | 1325–1855 (125–6,335) | |
| 79 (22–328) | 362 (148–573) | |
| 353 (148–2243) | 1393 (543–2453) | |
| 19 688 (13 313–30 113) | 26 925 (16 875–45 225) | |
| 2 | 0.34 | 0.54 |
| 2 | 4.65 | 0 |
aSplitting time estimates (T = t ) were converted into calendar years using a per-generation mutation rate (μ) of 5.0 × 10−4 and two generation times (G) 5 and 7 years.