Literature DB >> 22562188

An economic comparison of hospital-based and community-based glaucoma clinics.

A Sharma1, M Jofre-Bonet, M Panca, J G Lawrenson, I Murdoch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We have established one model for community care of glaucoma clinic patients. Community optometrists received training and accreditation in glaucoma care. Once qualified they alternated between running half day glaucoma clinics in their own High Street practices and assisting in a hospital-based glaucoma clinic session. This paper reports the cost of this model.
METHODS: Micro-costing was undertaken for the hospital clinic. A consensus meeting was held to agree costs for community clinics involving all optometrists in the project along with representatives of the multiple chain optometry practices who had participated. Costs to patients both indirect and direct were calculated following structured interviews of 197 patients attending hospital clinics and 194 attending community clinics.
RESULTS: The estimated cost per patient attendance to the hospital clinic was £63.91 and the estimated cost per attendance to the community clinic was £145.62. For patients the combined direct and indirect cost to attend the hospital clinic was £6.15 and the cost to attend the community clinic £5.91. DISCUSSION: The principal reason for the higher cost in the community clinic was higher overhead costs in the community. Re-referral to the hospital system only occurred for 9% of patients and was not a large contribution to the increased cost. Time requested to next appointment was similar for the two clinics. Sensitivity analysis shows a strong effect of increasing patients seen per clinic. It would, however, require 25 patients to be seen per clinician per day in the community in order to make the costs comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562188      PMCID: PMC3396173          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Shared care in glaucoma: a national study of secondary care lead schemes in England.

Authors:  S A Vernon; A Adair
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparing costs of monitoring glaucoma patients: hospital ophthalmologists versus community optometrists.

Authors:  J Coast; I C Spencer; L Smith; P G Spry
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-01

3.  The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years.

Authors:  S F Gray; P G Spry; S T Brookes; T J Peters; I C Spencer; I A Baker; J M Sparrow; D L Easty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Hospital-based glaucoma clinics: what are the costs to patients?

Authors:  A Sharma; M Jofre-Bonet; M Panca; J G Lawrenson; I Murdoch
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Microcosting quantity data collection methods.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The cost of monitoring glaucoma patients by community optometrists.

Authors:  I C Spencer; J Coast; P G Spry; L Smith; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.117

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Response to 'An economic comparison of hospital-based and community-based glaucoma clinics'.

Authors:  M Johnson; A Jones; J Tickner
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Nonmedical Out-of-Pocket Patient and Companion Expenditures Associated With Glaucoma Care.

Authors:  Emily M Schehlein; Lily T Im; Alan L Robin; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Osamah J Saeedi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Micro-costing the provision of emotional support and information in UK eye clinics.

Authors:  Hanna Gillespie-Gallery; Ahalya Subramanian; Miriam L Conway
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Different strategies and cost-effectiveness in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Naomi Sj Ting; James Ft Li Yim; Jia Y Ng
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-12-04

5.  Improving Patient Access and Reducing Costs for Glaucoma with Integrated Hospital and Community Care: A Case Study from Australia.

Authors:  Belinda K Ford; Blake Angell; Gerald Liew; Andrew J R White; Lisa J Keay
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  A qualitative study of stakeholder views regarding participation in locally commissioned enhanced optometric services.

Authors:  E Konstantakopoulou; R A Harper; D F Edgar; J G Lawrenson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Systematic Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Pavi Agrawal; Steven E Bradshaw
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-05-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.