Literature DB >> 19960038

Hospital-based glaucoma clinics: what are the costs to patients?

A Sharma1, M Jofre-Bonet, M Panca, J G Lawrenson, I Murdoch.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the costs to patients attending hospital-based glaucoma clinics.
METHODS: A patient-based costs questionnaire was developed and completed for patients attending six ophthalmology units across London (Ealing General Hospital, St Georges Hospital, Mile End Hospital, Upney Centre Barking, St Ann's Hospital and the Royal London Hospital). The questionnaire considered age, sex, ethnicity as well as patient-based costs, opportunity costs, and companion costs. All patients visiting for review or appointments were approached non-selectively. A total of 100 patients were sampled from each unit.
RESULTS: The mean age of the full sample was 69.6 years (SD 12.6), with little variation between sites (68.5-71.8 years). There was an almost equal sex distribution (male (298 (50.6%)). There was no major difference in occupational distribution between sites. The majority of people came to hospital by bus (40%) or car (26%). Female patients went slightly more by cab or car, whereas male patients went slightly more by foot or train. There was some variability in transport method by site. The data showed that the Royal London hospital had the highest mean cost per visit (pound16.20), whereas St Georges had the lowest (pound12.90). Upney had the second highest mean cost per visit (pound15.20), whereas Ealing and St Ann's had similar mean costs of (pound13.25) and (pound13), respectively. Travel costs accounted for about one-fifth of the total patient's costs. For all glaucoma clinics, total societal costs were higher than the sum of patients' costs because of the high frequency of companions. A surprising finding was that two-thirds of the population (392 or 66.6%) reported no qualification-considerably higher than the national census statistics for the same population.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this paper presents direct and indirect patient costs in attending hospital glaucoma units for the first time. It highlights the significance of opportunity costs when considering health-care interventions as they amount to a third or more of the total costs of patient attendances to clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19960038     DOI: 10.1038/eye.2009.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Intervention costs and cost-effectiveness for a multiple-risk-factor diabetes self-management trial for Latinas: economic analysis of ¡Viva Bien!

Authors:  Debra P Ritzwoller; Anna S Sukhanova; Russell E Glasgow; Lisa A Strycker; Diane K King; Bridget Gaglio; Deborah J Toobert
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  An economic comparison of hospital-based and community-based glaucoma clinics.

Authors:  A Sharma; M Jofre-Bonet; M Panca; J G Lawrenson; I Murdoch
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A qualitative investigation into patients' views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring.

Authors:  Fiona C Glen; Helen Baker; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Acceptability of a home-based visual field test (Eyecatcher) for glaucoma home monitoring: a qualitative study of patients' views and experiences.

Authors:  Lee Jones; Tamsin Callaghan; Peter Campbell; Pete R Jones; Deanna J Taylor; Daniel S Asfaw; David F Edgar; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines.

Authors:  Rizwan Malik; Helen Baker; Richard A Russell; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.