Literature DB >> 19536026

Microcosting quantity data collection methods.

Kevin D Frick1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microcosting studies collect detailed data on resources used and the value of those resources. Such studies are useful for estimating the cost of new technologies or new community-based interventions, for producing estimates in studies that include nonmarket goods, and for studying within-procedure cost variation.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this article were to (1) describe basic microcosting methods focusing on quantity data collection; and (2) suggest a research agenda to improve methods in and the interpretation of microcosting. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Examples in the published literature were used to illustrate steps in the methods of gathering data (primarily quantity data) for a microcosting study.
RESULTS: Quantity data collection methods that were illustrated in the literature include the use of (1) administrative databases at single facilities, (2) insurer administrative data, (3) forms applied across multiple settings, (4) an expert panel, (5) surveys or interviews of one or more types of providers; (6) review of patient charts, (7) direct observation, (8) personal digital assistants, (9) program operation logs, and (10) diary data.
CONCLUSIONS: Future microcosting studies are likely to improve if research is done to compare the validity and cost of different data collection methods; if a critical review is conducted of studies done to date; and if the combination of the results of the first 2 steps described are used to develop guidelines that address common limitations, critical judgment points, and decisions that can reduce limitations and improve the quality of studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19536026      PMCID: PMC2714580          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  23 in total

Review 1.  Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis.

Authors:  Dan Greenberg; Allison B Rosen; Natalia V Olchanski; Patricia W Stone; John Nadai; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-20

Review 2.  Direct measurement of health care costs.

Authors:  Mark W Smith; Paul G Barnett
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Health-service costs of pediatric cochlear implantation: multi-center analysis.

Authors:  Garry R Barton; Karen E Bloor; David H Marshall; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Breastfeeding duration, costs, and benefits of a support program for low-income breastfeeding women.

Authors:  Linda C Pugh; Renee A Milligan; Kevin D Frick; Diane Spatz; Yvonne Bronner
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L W Traverso; K Hargrave
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Damian Walker; Rosalind Raine; Andrew Hutchings; Jennifer A Roberts
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Measurement of indirect costs for people with vision impairment.

Authors:  Shiao-Lan Chou; RoseAnne Misajon; Jayne Gallo; Jill E Keeffe
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Attributable costs and length of stay of an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Archana Gupta; Maureen Loughrey; Phyllis Della-Latta; Jeannie Cimiotti; Elaine Larson; David Rubenstein; Lisa Saiman
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Costs of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: a micro-costing approach based on healthcare payer's data sources.

Authors:  J Ruof; J L Hülsemann; T Mittendorf; S Handelmann; J M von der Schulenburg; H Zeidler; S Merkesdal
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  The treatment of newly diagnosed patients with glaucoma or with ocular hypertension in The Netherlands: an observational study of costs and initial treatment success based on retrospective chart review.

Authors:  J B Oostenbrink; M P Rutten-van Mölken; T S Opdenoordt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  97 in total

1.  Visualization versus neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves during thyroidectomy: what about the costs?

Authors:  Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Alessandro Bacuzzi; Luigi Boni; Stefano Rausei; Francesca Rovera; Renzo Dionigi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Estimation of Cost for Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in a High-Risk Population in Rural China: Results from a Population-Level Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fuxiao Li; Xiang Li; Chuanhai Guo; Ruiping Xu; Fenglei Li; Yaqi Pan; Mengfei Liu; Zhen Liu; Chao Shi; Hui Wang; Minmin Wang; Hongrui Tian; Fangfang Liu; Ying Liu; Jingjing Li; Hong Cai; Li Yang; Zhonghu He; Yang Ke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.

Authors:  Fiona Lobban; Nadia Akers; Duncan Appelbe; Rossella Iraci Capuccinello; Lesley Chapman; Lizzi Collinge; Susanna Dodd; Sue Flowers; Bruce Hollingsworth; Mahsa Honary; Sonia Johnson; Steven H Jones; Ceu Mateus; Barbara Mezes; Elizabeth Murray; Katerina Panagaki; Naomi Rainford; Heather Robinson; Anna Rosala-Hallas; William Sellwood; Andrew Walker; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Estimating the cost to U.S. health departments to conduct HIV surveillance.

Authors:  Ram K Shrestha; Stephanie L Sansom; Benjamin T Laffoon; Paul G Farnham; R Luke Shouse; Karen MacMaster; H Irene Hall
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Cost Analysis and Performance Assessment of Partner Services for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, New York State, 2014.

Authors:  Britney L Johnson; James Tesoriero; Wenhui Feng; Feng Qian; Erika G Martin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice.

Authors:  Richard T Meenan; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Sally W Vernon; Sharon Fuller; Ching-Yun Wang; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Introducing routine intraoperative nerve monitoring in a high-volume endocrine surgery centre: a health technology assessment.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Prete; Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella; Giovanna Di Meo; Alessandro Pasculli; Giovanna Calculli; Gianluigi Protopapa; Angela Gurrado; Mario Testini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-07-01

8.  Estimating development cost of an interactive website based cancer screening promotion program.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Tong Han Chung; Lisa G Smith; Jeffrey K Springston; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2015-02-23

9.  Cost analysis of inpatient treatment of anorexia nervosa in adolescents: hospital and caregiver perspectives.

Authors:  Alene Toulany; Matthew Wong; Debra K Katzman; Nadia Akseer; Cathleen Steinegger; Rebecca L Hancock-Howard; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

10.  The Affordability of Providing Sexually Transmitted Disease Services at a Safety-net Clinic.

Authors:  Lorraine T Dean; Madeline C Montgomery; Julia Raifman; Amy Nunn; Thomas Bertrand; Alexi Almonte; Philip A Chan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.