Literature DB >> 10180649

Comparing costs of monitoring glaucoma patients: hospital ophthalmologists versus community optometrists.

J Coast1, I C Spencer, L Smith, P G Spry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs of monitoring stable glaucoma patients by community optometrists and hospital ophthalmologists.
METHODS: A cost analysis was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial which compared the accuracy and acceptability of measurement in each form of care. The viewpoints of the health service and of patients were considered. Costs were assessed using a number of different methods. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for key variables.
RESULTS: The baseline analysis reflected heavily the different length of time between follow-up in the two arms of the trial (10 months (average) for hospital, 6 months for optometrists). It showed annual cost per patient for hospital ophthalmologists varied from 14.50 pounds to 59.95 pounds, and community optometrist costs varied from 68.98 pounds to 108.98 pounds. Assuming a 6-month follow-up interval for the hospital ophthalmologists, costs varied from 24.16 pounds to 99.92 pounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations about the least costly form of follow-up must depend on the context in which the decision is being taken and the scale of change envisaged. If the aim is to recoup resources from hospitals in order to pay for monitoring in the community, community monitoring is unlikely to be the least costly option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10180649     DOI: 10.1177/135581969700200106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  10 in total

1.  How to defuse a demographic time bomb: the way forward?

Authors:  J C Buchan; W Amoaku; B Barnes; A Cassels-Brown; B Y Chang; J Harcourt; D Shickle; A F Spencer; S A Vernon; C MacEwen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Improving care and increasing efficiency-challenges in the care of chronic eye diseases.

Authors:  A Kotecha; S Turner; C Vasilakis; M Utley; N Fulop; A Azuara-Blanco; P J Foster
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  A systematic review of teleophthalmological studies in Europe.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  The economic implications of glaucoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Michael T Halpern; Mechelle L Jones
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years.

Authors:  S F Gray; P G Spry; S T Brookes; T J Peters; I C Spencer; I A Baker; J M Sparrow; D L Easty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures.

Authors:  P G Spry; I C Spencer; J M Sparrow; T J Peters; S T Brookes; S Gray; I Baker; J E Furber; D L Easty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  An economic comparison of hospital-based and community-based glaucoma clinics.

Authors:  A Sharma; M Jofre-Bonet; M Panca; J G Lawrenson; I Murdoch
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Cost-effectiveness of monitoring glaucoma patients in shared care: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kim M Holtzer-Goor; Esther van Sprundel; Hans G Lemij; Thomas Plochg; Niek S Klazinga; Marc A Koopmanschap
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Improving Patient Access and Reducing Costs for Glaucoma with Integrated Hospital and Community Care: A Case Study from Australia.

Authors:  Belinda K Ford; Blake Angell; Gerald Liew; Andrew J R White; Lisa J Keay
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  Evaluating the cost and wait-times of a task-sharing model of care for diabetic eye care: a case study from Australia.

Authors:  Nina Tahhan; Belinda Kate Ford; Blake Angell; Gerald Liew; Joseph Nazarian; Glen Maberly; Paul Mitchell; Andrew J R White; Lisa Keay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.