Literature DB >> 22559620

Sparse and optimal acquisition design for diffusion MRI and beyond.

Cheng Guan Koay1, Evren Ozarslan, Kevin M Johnson, M Elizabeth Meyerand.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with functional MRI promises a whole new vista for scientists to investigate noninvasively the structural and functional connectivity of the human brain-the human connectome, which had heretofore been out of reach. As with other imaging modalities, diffusion MRI data are inherently noisy and its acquisition time-consuming. Further, a faithful representation of the human connectome that can serve as a predictive model requires a robust and accurate data-analytic pipeline. The focus of this paper is on one of the key segments of this pipeline-in particular, the development of a sparse and optimal acquisition (SOA) design for diffusion MRI multiple-shell acquisition and beyond.
METHODS: The authors propose a novel optimality criterion for sparse multiple-shell acquisition and quasimultiple-shell designs in diffusion MRI and a novel and effective semistochastic and moderately greedy combinatorial search strategy with simulated annealing to locate the optimum design or configuration. The goal of the optimality criteria is threefold: first, to maximize uniformity of the diffusion measurements in each shell, which is equivalent to maximal incoherence in angular measurements; second, to maximize coverage of the diffusion measurements around each radial line to achieve maximal incoherence in radial measurements for multiple-shell acquisition; and finally, to ensure maximum uniformity of diffusion measurement directions in the limiting case when all the shells are coincidental as in the case of a single-shell acquisition. The approach taken in evaluating the stability of various acquisition designs is based on the condition number and the A-optimal measure of the design matrix.
RESULTS: Even though the number of distinct configurations for a given set of diffusion gradient directions is very large in general-e.g., in the order of 10(232) for a set of 144 diffusion gradient directions, the proposed search strategy was found to be effective in finding the optimum configuration. It was found that the square design is the most robust (i.e., with stable condition numbers and A-optimal measures under varying experimental conditions) among many other possible designs of the same sample size. Under the same performance evaluation, the square design was found to be more robust than the widely used sampling schemes similar to that of 3D radial MRI and of diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI).
CONCLUSIONS: A novel optimality criterion for sparse multiple-shell acquisition and quasimultiple-shell designs in diffusion MRI and an effective search strategy for finding the best configuration have been developed. The results are very promising, interesting, and practical for diffusion MRI acquisitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559620      PMCID: PMC3344880          DOI: 10.1118/1.3700166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  54 in total

1.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI.

Authors:  S Skare; M Hedehus; M E Moseley; T Q Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Optimization of view ordering for motion artifact suppression.

Authors:  T D Nguyen; G Ding; R Watts; Y Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity.

Authors:  David S Tuch; Timothy G Reese; Mette R Wiegell; Nikos Makris; John W Belliveau; Van J Wedeen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  A simple scheme for generating nearly uniform distribution of antipodally symmetric points on the unit sphere.

Authors:  Cheng Guan Koay
Journal:  J Comput Sci       Date:  2011-12

5.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  C Pierpaoli; P Jezzard; P J Basser; A Barnett; G Di Chiro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast.

Authors:  Reed F Busse; Hari Hariharan; Anthony Vu; Jean H Brittain
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Optimal acquisition orders of diffusion-weighted MRI measurements.

Authors:  Philip A Cook; Mark Symms; Philip A Boulby; Daniel C Alexander
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Sodium MRI using a density-adapted 3D radial acquisition technique.

Authors:  Armin M Nagel; Frederik B Laun; Marc-André Weber; Christian Matthies; Wolfhard Semmler; Lothar R Schad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Analytically exact spiral scheme for generating uniformly distributed points on the unit sphere.

Authors:  Cheng Guan Koay
Journal:  J Comput Sci       Date:  2011-03-01

10.  Sparse multi-shell diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Yogesh Rathi; O Michailovich; K Setsompop; S Bouix; M E Shenton; C F Westin
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011
View more
  14 in total

1.  Single- and Multiple-Shell Uniform Sampling Schemes for Diffusion MRI Using Spherical Codes.

Authors:  Jian Cheng; Dinggang Shen; Pew-Thian Yap; Peter J Basser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Conceptual Foundations of Diffusion in Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Cheng Guan Koay; Evren Özarslan
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 0.481

3.  A 4D hyperspherical interpretation of q-space.

Authors:  A Pasha Hosseinbor; Moo K Chung; Yu-Chien Wu; Barbara B Bendlin; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Design of multishell sampling schemes with uniform coverage in diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Emmanuel Caruyer; Christophe Lenglet; Guillermo Sapiro; Rachid Deriche
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Optimization of a free water elimination two-compartment model for diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Andrew R Hoy; Cheng Guan Koay; Steven R Kecskemeti; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of mouse brain microstructure.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Jieying Zhang; Gary Cofer; Yi Qi; Robert J Anderson; Leonard E White; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  High-resolution mapping and digital atlas of subcortical regions in the macaque monkey based on matched MAP-MRI and histology.

Authors:  Kadharbatcha S Saleem; Alexandru V Avram; Daniel Glen; Cecil Chern-Chyi Yen; Frank Q Ye; Michal Komlosh; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI: a novel diffusion imaging method for mapping tissue microstructure.

Authors:  Evren Özarslan; Cheng Guan Koay; Timothy M Shepherd; Michal E Komlosh; M Okan İrfanoğlu; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Tract Orientation and Angular Dispersion Deviation Indicator (TOADDI): A framework for single-subject analysis in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Cheng Guan Koay; Ping-Hong Yeh; John M Ollinger; M Okan İrfanoğlu; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser; Terrence R Oakes; Gerard Riedy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Clinical feasibility of using mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI to characterize brain tissue microstructure.

Authors:  Alexandru V Avram; Joelle E Sarlls; Alan S Barnett; Evren Özarslan; Cibu Thomas; M Okan Irfanoglu; Elizabeth Hutchinson; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.