PURPOSE: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with functional MRI promises a whole new vista for scientists to investigate noninvasively the structural and functional connectivity of the human brain-the human connectome, which had heretofore been out of reach. As with other imaging modalities, diffusion MRI data are inherently noisy and its acquisition time-consuming. Further, a faithful representation of the human connectome that can serve as a predictive model requires a robust and accurate data-analytic pipeline. The focus of this paper is on one of the key segments of this pipeline-in particular, the development of a sparse and optimal acquisition (SOA) design for diffusion MRI multiple-shell acquisition and beyond. METHODS: The authors propose a novel optimality criterion for sparse multiple-shell acquisition and quasimultiple-shell designs in diffusion MRI and a novel and effective semistochastic and moderately greedy combinatorial search strategy with simulated annealing to locate the optimum design or configuration. The goal of the optimality criteria is threefold: first, to maximize uniformity of the diffusion measurements in each shell, which is equivalent to maximal incoherence in angular measurements; second, to maximize coverage of the diffusion measurements around each radial line to achieve maximal incoherence in radial measurements for multiple-shell acquisition; and finally, to ensure maximum uniformity of diffusion measurement directions in the limiting case when all the shells are coincidental as in the case of a single-shell acquisition. The approach taken in evaluating the stability of various acquisition designs is based on the condition number and the A-optimal measure of the design matrix. RESULTS: Even though the number of distinct configurations for a given set of diffusion gradient directions is very large in general-e.g., in the order of 10(232) for a set of 144 diffusion gradient directions, the proposed search strategy was found to be effective in finding the optimum configuration. It was found that the square design is the most robust (i.e., with stable condition numbers and A-optimal measures under varying experimental conditions) among many other possible designs of the same sample size. Under the same performance evaluation, the square design was found to be more robust than the widely used sampling schemes similar to that of 3D radial MRI and of diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI). CONCLUSIONS: A novel optimality criterion for sparse multiple-shell acquisition and quasimultiple-shell designs in diffusion MRI and an effective search strategy for finding the best configuration have been developed. The results are very promising, interesting, and practical for diffusion MRI acquisitions.
PURPOSE: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with functional MRI promises a whole new vista for scientists to investigate noninvasively the structural and functional connectivity of the human brain-the human connectome, which had heretofore been out of reach. As with other imaging modalities, diffusion MRI data are inherently noisy and its acquisition time-consuming. Further, a faithful representation of the human connectome that can serve as a predictive model requires a robust and accurate data-analytic pipeline. The focus of this paper is on one of the key segments of this pipeline-in particular, the development of a sparse and optimal acquisition (SOA) design for diffusion MRI multiple-shell acquisition and beyond. METHODS: The authors propose a novel optimality criterion for sparse multiple-shell acquisition and quasimultiple-shell designs in diffusion MRI and a novel and effective semistochastic and moderately greedy combinatorial search strategy with simulated annealing to locate the optimum design or configuration. The goal of the optimality criteria is threefold: first, to maximize uniformity of the diffusion measurements in each shell, which is equivalent to maximal incoherence in angular measurements; second, to maximize coverage of the diffusion measurements around each radial line to achieve maximal incoherence in radial measurements for multiple-shell acquisition; and finally, to ensure maximum uniformity of diffusion measurement directions in the limiting case when all the shells are coincidental as in the case of a single-shell acquisition. The approach taken in evaluating the stability of various acquisition designs is based on the condition number and the A-optimal measure of the design matrix. RESULTS: Even though the number of distinct configurations for a given set of diffusion gradient directions is very large in general-e.g., in the order of 10(232) for a set of 144 diffusion gradient directions, the proposed search strategy was found to be effective in finding the optimum configuration. It was found that the square design is the most robust (i.e., with stable condition numbers and A-optimal measures under varying experimental conditions) among many other possible designs of the same sample size. Under the same performance evaluation, the square design was found to be more robust than the widely used sampling schemes similar to that of 3D radial MRI and of diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI). CONCLUSIONS: A novel optimality criterion for sparse multiple-shell acquisition and quasimultiple-shell designs in diffusion MRI and an effective search strategy for finding the best configuration have been developed. The results are very promising, interesting, and practical for diffusion MRI acquisitions.
Authors: David S Tuch; Timothy G Reese; Mette R Wiegell; Nikos Makris; John W Belliveau; Van J Wedeen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Armin M Nagel; Frederik B Laun; Marc-André Weber; Christian Matthies; Wolfhard Semmler; Lothar R Schad Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: A Pasha Hosseinbor; Moo K Chung; Yu-Chien Wu; Barbara B Bendlin; Andrew L Alexander Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-01-03 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Nian Wang; Jieying Zhang; Gary Cofer; Yi Qi; Robert J Anderson; Leonard E White; G Allan Johnson Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2019-04-20 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Kadharbatcha S Saleem; Alexandru V Avram; Daniel Glen; Cecil Chern-Chyi Yen; Frank Q Ye; Michal Komlosh; Peter J Basser Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Evren Özarslan; Cheng Guan Koay; Timothy M Shepherd; Michal E Komlosh; M Okan İrfanoğlu; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-04-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Cheng Guan Koay; Ping-Hong Yeh; John M Ollinger; M Okan İrfanoğlu; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser; Terrence R Oakes; Gerard Riedy Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Alexandru V Avram; Joelle E Sarlls; Alan S Barnett; Evren Özarslan; Cibu Thomas; M Okan Irfanoglu; Elizabeth Hutchinson; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 6.556