| Literature DB >> 22558432 |
Laurence Delhaes1, Sébastien Monchy, Emilie Fréalle, Christine Hubans, Julia Salleron, Sylvie Leroy, Anne Prevotat, Frédérick Wallet, Benoit Wallaert, Eduardo Dei-Cas, Telesphore Sime-Ngando, Magali Chabé, Eric Viscogliosi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given the polymicrobial nature of pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), it is essential to enhance our knowledge on the composition of the microbial community to improve patient management. In this study, we developed a pyrosequencing approach to extensively explore the diversity and dynamics of fungal and prokaryotic populations in CF lower airways. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22558432 PMCID: PMC3338676 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical data and treatment from CF patients included in the study.
| Sample Identification | Clinical data from CF patients | Standard Spirometry | Treatment | |||||||||||
| Patient- Date (mm/yyyy) | Age (year) | Sex | Known CFTR mutation | S-K score | BMI | SaO2(%) | FVC | FEV | ATB | Corticosteroids | Azithromycin | ATF | ||
| IV |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| 1-01/2008 Patient1-sample1 | 29 | F | ΔF508 ΔF508 | 55 | 19.9 | 95 | 64 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ITC |
| 1-01/2009 Patient 1-sample 2 | 30 | 50 | 18.6 | 96 | 61 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ITC (183) | ||
| 2-03/2008 Patient 2-sample1 | 38 | M | ΔF508R347H | 90 | 20.8 | 98 | 118 | 114 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2-03/2009 Patient 2-sample 2 | 39 | ND | 21.5 | 96 | 114 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3-09/2007 Patient 3-sample 1 | 29 | M | ΔF508ΔF508 | 90 | 25.5 | 96 | 109 | 68 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3-09/2008 Patient 3-sample 2 | 30 | 85 | 24.2 | 96 | 86 | 58 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4-08/2008 Patient 4-sample 1 | 19 | F | UNK | 50 | 15.2 | 97 | 35 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 4-10/2008 Patient 4-sample 2 | 20 | 45 | 15.6 | 91 | 34 | 48 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
S-K score, Shwachman-Kulczycki Score;
BMI, body mass index;
FVC, forced vital capacity;
FEV1, forced expiratory volume;
ATB, antibiotic drug;
ATF, antifungal drug;
ITC, itraconazole;
UNK, unknown CFTR mutations associated with an abnormally high sweat chloride test (110 mmol/L).
Microbiological data from CF patients included in the study.
| Sample Identification | Conventional analysis of sputum | ||||
| Bacteriological culture | Mycological culture | Molecular analysis | |||
| Patient- sample | Bacteria | DE | Fungi | Nested PCR | rt-PCR |
| Patient 1-sample 1 |
| 0 |
| − | − |
| Patient 1-sample 2 |
| 0 |
| + | − |
| Patient 2-sample 1 | ND | 0 |
| + | + |
| Patient 2-sample 2 |
| 0 |
| + | + |
| Patient 3-sample 1 |
| 0 |
| − | + |
| Patient 3-sample 2 |
| PH,H |
| − | + |
| Patient 4-sample 1 |
| 0 |
| + | − |
| Patient 4-sample 2 |
| H |
| − | + |
DE, direct examination;
Nested PCR was used to identify Pneumocystis jirovecii colonization [26];
rt-PCR, real-time polymerase chain reaction assay to detect Aspergillus fumigatus [27];
ND, not done;
PH, Pseudo-hyphae and H, hyphae.
Figure 1Rarefaction curves.
These curves are representing the numbers of OTUs with respect to the number of pyrosequence reads obtained from each patient at different sampling times and using the two set of primers targeting prokaryotic 16S rDNA (A) and fungal ITS2 (B) loci.
Number of 16S-pyrosequencing reads assigned to each taxonomic group of Bacteria.
| Sequences (reads) | ||||||||
| Identification | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | ||||
| Sample1 | Sample2 | Sample1 | Sample2 | Sample1 | Sample2 | Sample1 | Sample2 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Actinomycetales | 0 | 7 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Actinomyces | 6 | 11 | 47 | 44 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rothia | 0 | 0 | 458 | 158 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Atopobium | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||
| Bacteroidales | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Porphyromonas | 0 | 0 | 145 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| Prevotellaceae | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 27 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Prevotella | 98 | 8 | 784 | 2098 | 620 | 11 | 10 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 38 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bacilli | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bacillales | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemella | 0 | 0 | 113 | 22 | 79 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| Lactobacillales | 0 | 0 | 12 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Enterococcus | 0 | 0 | 40 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Streptococcus | 5 | 7 | 255 | 931 | 446 | 5 | 6 | 0 |
| Clostridia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clostridiales | 0 | 0 | 11 | 39 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mogibacterium | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eubacterium | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catonella | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Veillonellaceae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Megasphaera | 0 | 0 | 7 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Veillonella | 8 | 6 | 63 | 236 | 104 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||
| Fusobacterium | 0 | 0 | 46 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Leptotrichia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 47 | 41 | 30 | 19 | 6 | 51 | 50 | 67 |
| Betaproteobacteria | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alcaligenaceae | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neisseriaceae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neisseria | 0 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 16 |
| Campylobacter | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 1349 | 4622 | 68 | 9 | 0 | 5370 | 1303 | 1666 |
| Pasteurellaceae | 0 | 0 | 255 | 83 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Haemophilus | 0 | 0 | 124 | 5476 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Moraxella | 0 | 0 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pseudomonas | 5851 | 230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 833 | 6744 | 8298 |
| Stenotrophomonas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Once a read was assigned to the highest taxonomical level according to the criteria defined in material and method section, it was not added up in the next taxonomic level.
Number of ITS-pyrosequencing reads assigned to each taxonomic group of Fungi.
| Sequences (reads) | ||||||||
| Identification | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | ||||
| Sample1 | Sample 2 | Sample1 | Sample2 | Sample1 | Sample2 | Sample1 | Sample2 | |
|
| 9 | 7 | 36 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 52 | 18 |
|
| 0 | 14 | 31 | 26 | 18 | 50 | 5 | 12 |
| Saccharomyceta | 6 | 257 | 129 | 199 | 7 | 4 | 38 | 107 |
| Pezizomycotina | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Leotiomyceta | 1 | 1 | 1722 | 216 | 89 | 188 | 0 | 104 |
| Dothideomycetes | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cryptococcus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 145 |
| Didymella | 0 | 117 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Phaeosphaeria | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eurotiomycetes | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eurotiomycetidae | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Eurotiales | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Trichocomaceae | 0 | 0 | 120 | 462 | 1108 | 2661 | 0 | 129 |
| Eurotium | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mitosporic Trichocomaceae | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Aspergillus | 0 | 0 | 403 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Penicillium | 0 | 0 | 25 | 306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neosartorya | 0 | 0 | 0 | 557 | 1887 | 5179 | 0 | 239 |
| Sordariomyceta | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Helotiales | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chalara | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sclerotiniaceae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sordariomycetes | 8 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypocreales | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nectria | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Xylariales | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Physalospora | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Saccharomycetes | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3330 | 0 |
| Saccharomycetales | 9 | 60 | 92 | 60 | 198 | 0 | 808 | 116 |
| Dipodascaceae | 11 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clavispora | 0 | 0 | 139 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Candida | 202 | 8688 | 5126 | 7167 | 6078 | 0 | 1173 | 6916 |
| Saccharomycetaceae | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 398 | 0 |
| Kluyveromyces | 483 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Saccharomyces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Torulaspora | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 104 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 74 |
| Agaricomycotina | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Agaricomycetes | 0 | 0 | 477 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 20 |
| Hyphodontia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 488 | 0 |
| Coriolaceae | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Piptoporus | 0 | 0 | 103 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Phlebiopsis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 |
| Russulales | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peniophora | 0 | 0 | 204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stereum | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Agaricomycetidae | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Agaricales | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Physalacriaceae | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Strobilurus | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tremellomycetes | 0 | 0 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dioszegia | 0 | 0 | 129 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sporobolomyces | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Microbotryomycetes | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Sporidiobolales | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 0 |
| Sporobolomyces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Ustilaginomycotina | 9 | 0 | 8 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Entylomataceae | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Entyloma | 0 | 0 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malassezia | 473 | 0 | 201 | 302 | 0 | 338 | 0 | 75 |
| Microstromatales | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Quambalaria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
Once a read was assigned to the highest taxonomical level according to the criteria defined in material and method section, it was not added up in the next taxonomic level.
Figure 2Relation between species richness and clinical status (A) or lung function (B).
Total richness of prokaryotic and fungal communities from each patient-sample was expressed using the Chao1 richness estimator; each spot size is proportional to the corresponding Chao1 value. The clinical status is expressed as S-K score and BMI in Figure 2A, while lung function is expressed as FEV1 and FVC values in Figure 2B. Given to the absence of S-K score value from Patient 2-sample 2 (Table 1), this spot is missing in Figure 2A. Bacterial and fungal Chao1 values corresponding to Patient 1, Patient 2, Patient 3, and Patient 4 are represented in blue-, green-, red- and yellow-edged spots, respectively. Dark and light colour intensity is corresponding to the first and second sampling dates of each patient, respectively. Dark grey and light grey are corresponding to fungal and bacterial Chao1 richness values, respectively.