MOTIVATION: RNA-Seq experiments have shown great potential for transcriptome profiling. While sequencing increases the level of biological detail, integrative data analysis is also important. One avenue is the construction of coexpression networks. Because the capacity of RNA-Seq data for network construction has not been previously evaluated, we constructed a coexpression network using striatal samples, derived its network properties and compared it with microarray-based networks. RESULTS: The RNA-Seq coexpression network displayed scale-free, hierarchical network structure. We detected transcripts groups (modules) with correlated profiles; modules overlap distinct ontology categories. Neuroanatomical data from the Allen Brain Atlas reveal several modules with spatial colocalization. The network was compared with microarray-derived networks; correlations from RNA-Seq data were higher, likely because greater sensitivity and dynamic range. Higher correlations result in higher network connectivity, heterogeneity and centrality. For transcripts present across platforms, network structure appeared largely preserved. From this study, we present the first RNA-Seq data de novo network inference.
MOTIVATION: RNA-Seq experiments have shown great potential for transcriptome profiling. While sequencing increases the level of biological detail, integrative data analysis is also important. One avenue is the construction of coexpression networks. Because the capacity of RNA-Seq data for network construction has not been previously evaluated, we constructed a coexpression network using striatal samples, derived its network properties and compared it with microarray-based networks. RESULTS: The RNA-Seq coexpression network displayed scale-free, hierarchical network structure. We detected transcripts groups (modules) with correlated profiles; modules overlap distinct ontology categories. Neuroanatomical data from the Allen Brain Atlas reveal several modules with spatial colocalization. The network was compared with microarray-derived networks; correlations from RNA-Seq data were higher, likely because greater sensitivity and dynamic range. Higher correlations result in higher network connectivity, heterogeneity and centrality. For transcripts present across platforms, network structure appeared largely preserved. From this study, we present the first RNA-Seq data de novo network inference.
Authors: Ed S Lein; Michael J Hawrylycz; Nancy Ao; Mikael Ayres; Amy Bensinger; Amy Bernard; Andrew F Boe; Mark S Boguski; Kevin S Brockway; Emi J Byrnes; Lin Chen; Li Chen; Tsuey-Ming Chen; Mei Chi Chin; Jimmy Chong; Brian E Crook; Aneta Czaplinska; Chinh N Dang; Suvro Datta; Nick R Dee; Aimee L Desaki; Tsega Desta; Ellen Diep; Tim A Dolbeare; Matthew J Donelan; Hong-Wei Dong; Jennifer G Dougherty; Ben J Duncan; Amanda J Ebbert; Gregor Eichele; Lili K Estin; Casey Faber; Benjamin A Facer; Rick Fields; Shanna R Fischer; Tim P Fliss; Cliff Frensley; Sabrina N Gates; Katie J Glattfelder; Kevin R Halverson; Matthew R Hart; John G Hohmann; Maureen P Howell; Darren P Jeung; Rebecca A Johnson; Patrick T Karr; Reena Kawal; Jolene M Kidney; Rachel H Knapik; Chihchau L Kuan; James H Lake; Annabel R Laramee; Kirk D Larsen; Christopher Lau; Tracy A Lemon; Agnes J Liang; Ying Liu; Lon T Luong; Jesse Michaels; Judith J Morgan; Rebecca J Morgan; Marty T Mortrud; Nerick F Mosqueda; Lydia L Ng; Randy Ng; Geralyn J Orta; Caroline C Overly; Tu H Pak; Sheana E Parry; Sayan D Pathak; Owen C Pearson; Ralph B Puchalski; Zackery L Riley; Hannah R Rockett; Stephen A Rowland; Joshua J Royall; Marcos J Ruiz; Nadia R Sarno; Katherine Schaffnit; Nadiya V Shapovalova; Taz Sivisay; Clifford R Slaughterbeck; Simon C Smith; Kimberly A Smith; Bryan I Smith; Andy J Sodt; Nick N Stewart; Kenda-Ruth Stumpf; Susan M Sunkin; Madhavi Sutram; Angelene Tam; Carey D Teemer; Christina Thaller; Carol L Thompson; Lee R Varnam; Axel Visel; Ray M Whitlock; Paul E Wohnoutka; Crissa K Wolkey; Victoria Y Wong; Matthew Wood; Murat B Yaylaoglu; Rob C Young; Brian L Youngstrom; Xu Feng Yuan; Bin Zhang; Theresa A Zwingman; Allan R Jones Journal: Nature Date: 2006-12-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Shahid Mukhtar; Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis; Matija Dreze; Petra Epple; Jens Steinbrenner; Jonathan Moore; Murat Tasan; Mary Galli; Tong Hao; Marc T Nishimura; Samuel J Pevzner; Susan E Donovan; Lila Ghamsari; Balaji Santhanam; Viviana Romero; Matthew M Poulin; Fana Gebreab; Bryan J Gutierrez; Stanley Tam; Dario Monachello; Mike Boxem; Christopher J Harbort; Nathan McDonald; Lantian Gai; Huaming Chen; Yijian He; Jean Vandenhaute; Frederick P Roth; David E Hill; Joseph R Ecker; Marc Vidal; Jim Beynon; Pascal Braun; Jeffery L Dangl Journal: Science Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sean P Farris; Brien P Riley; Robert W Williams; Megan K Mulligan; Michael F Miles; Marcelo F Lopez; Robert Hitzemann; Ovidiu D Iancu; Alexander Colville; Nicole A R Walter; Priscila Darakjian; Denesa L Oberbeck; James B Daunais; Christina L Zheng; Robert P Searles; Shannon K McWeeney; Kathleen A Grant; R Dayne Mayfield Journal: Alcohol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Ovidiu Dan Iancu; Alex M Colville; Beth Wilmot; Robert Searles; Priscila Darakjian; Christina Zheng; Shannon McWeeney; Sunita Kawane; John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Denesa Oberbeck; Robert Hitzemann Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Pamela Metten; Ovidiu D Iancu; Stephanie E Spence; Nicole A R Walter; Denesa Oberbeck; Christina A Harrington; Alexandre Colville; Shannon McWeeney; Tamara J Phillips; Kari J Buck; John C Crabbe; John K Belknap; Robert J Hitzemann Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: T M Darlington; R D McCarthy; R J Cox; J Miyamoto-Ditmon; X Gallego; M A Ehringer Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.449