Literature DB >> 22553721

Malingering or simulation in ophthalmology-visual acuity.

Ali Ihsan Incesu1, Güngör Sobacı.   

Abstract

Simulation can be defined as malingering, or sometimes functional visual loss (FVL). It manifests as either simulating an ophthalmic disease (positive simulation), or denial of ophthalmic disease (negative simulation). Conscious behavior and compensation or indemnity claims are prominent features of simulation. Since some authors suggest that this is a manifestation of underlying psychopathology, even conversion is included in this context. In today's world, every ophthalmologist can face with simulation of ophthalmic disease or disorder. In case of simulation suspect, the physician's responsibility is to prove the simulation considering the disease/disorder first, and simulation as an exclusion. In simulation examinations, the physician should be firm and smart to select appropriate test(s) to convince not only the subject, but also the judge in case of indemnity or compensation trials. Almost all ophthalmic sensory and motor functions including visual acuity, visual field, color vision and night vision can be the subject of simulation. Examiner must be skillful in selecting the most appropriate test. Apart from those in the literature, we included all kinds of simulation in ophthalmology. In addition, simulation examination techniques, such as, use of OCT (optical coherence tomography), frequency doubling perimetry (FDP), and modified polarization tests were also included. In this review, we made a thorough literature search, and added our experiences to give the readers up-to-date information on malingering or simulation in ophthalmology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conversion; hysteria; malingering; simulation

Year:  2011        PMID: 22553721      PMCID: PMC3340730          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.05.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  31 in total

1.  The prism dissociation test in detecting unilateral functional visual loss.

Authors:  M L Slavin
Journal:  J Clin Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1990-06

2.  Practical clinical approaches to functional visual loss.

Authors:  Celia S Chen; Andrew W Lee; Arthur Karagiannis; John L Crompton; Dinesh Selva
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Hysterical blindness versus malingering.

Authors:  N C Singhal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Functional visual loss in adults and children patient characteristics, management, and outcomes.

Authors:  Su Ann Lim; R Michael Siatkowski; Bradley K Farris
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Assessment of young amblyopes. Array vs. single picture acuities.

Authors:  D W Rodier; D L Mayer; A B Fulton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Distance doubling visual acuity test: a reliable test for nonorganic visual loss.

Authors:  Sebastian Martin Zinkernagel; Daniel Stephane Mojon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  The California syndrome. Functional visual complaints with potential economic impact.

Authors:  J L Keltner; W N May; C A Johnson; R B Post
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Hysterical symptoms in ophthalmology.

Authors:  M Weller; P Wiedemann
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  The "sunglasses sign" predicts nonorganic visual loss in neuro-ophthalmologic practice.

Authors:  R Bengtzen; M Woodward; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Functional vision loss: a diagnosis of exclusion.

Authors:  Rex B Villegas; Pauline F Ilsen
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2007-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.

Authors:  Torsten Strasser; Fadi Nasser; Hana Langrová; Ditta Zobor; Łukasz Lisowski; Dominic Hillerkuss; Carla Sailer; Anne Kurtenbach; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Tests for malingering in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Incesu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Does Oblique Effect Affect SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment?

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Yuhui Du; Hui Li; Chengcheng Han; Peiyuan Tian; Zejin Li; Chenghang Du; Wenqiang Yan; Sicong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Increased resting-state functional connectivity in suprasellar tumor patients with postoperative visual improvement.

Authors:  Jianyou Ying; Chuzhong Li; Taoyang Yuan; Lu Jin; Rui Wang; Zhentao Zuo; Yazhuo Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.