| Literature DB >> 31588190 |
Jianyou Ying1, Chuzhong Li1, Taoyang Yuan1, Lu Jin2, Rui Wang1, Zhentao Zuo3,4,5, Yazhuo Zhang1,2,6,7.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Large suprasellar tumors often compress the optic chiasm and give rise to visual impairment. Most patients have significantly improved visual function at 1 to 4 months after chiasmal decompression surgery, and only a few individuals regain normal vision at 1 week after surgery. How the recovery of visual function in these patients affects the visual cortex is not fully understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate alterations in brain functional connectivity (FC) in suprasellar tumor patients with visual improvement using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).Entities:
Keywords: functional connectivity (FC).; local functional correlation (LCOR); resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI); suprasellar tumor; visual impairment score (VIS)
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31588190 PMCID: PMC6775267 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.35660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
MNI coordinates of ROI-wise seed nodes.
| Region name | Peak MNI coordinate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | |
| V1.L | -6 | -87 | 2 |
| V2v.L | -7 | -79 | -5 |
| V2d.L | -11 | -96 | 8 |
| VP.L | -14 | -76 | -8 |
| V3.L | -18 | -93 | 12 |
| V3a.L | -26 | -87 | 17 |
| V4.L | -22 | -70 | -8 |
| V5.L | -41 | -75 | 3 |
| V1.R | 8 | -83 | 5 |
| V2v.R | 10 | -74 | -1 |
| V2d.R | 10 | -91 | 11 |
| VP.R | 15 | -73 | 6 |
| V3.R | 15 | -91 | 16 |
| V3a.R | 20 | -86 | 21 |
| V4.R | 22 | -77 | -11 |
| V5.R | 46 | -66 | -1 |
L: left; R: right.
Demographic data and clinical factors of all patients.
| n | Gender | Age (years) | Duration (months) | Handedness | Approach | Pathology | VIS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-1w | Post-1m | ||||||||
| Patients | 13 | 8F / 5M | 46.5±6.9 | 8.5±10.3 | right | 12TS / 1TC | 11PA / 2ME | 25.6 ± 10.4 | 12.5 ± 9.8 | 4.6 ± 6.7 |
F: female; M: male; TS: transsphenoidal; TC: transcranial; PA: pituitary adenoma; ME: meningioma.
Figure 1VISs at Pre-op, Post-1w and Post-1m. The VIS gradually decreased after surgery. A significant treatment effect was observed from Pre-op to Post-1w (t(12) = 5.14, p < 0.001), and a significant recovery effect was observed from Post-1w to Post-1m (t(12) = 4.68, p < 0.002) (** p<0.01, *** p<0.001).
LCOR values in the left V1 at the Pre-op, Post-1w and Post-1m time points.
| Region | Mean (SD) | F(2,24)/p | t(12)/p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-1w | Post-1m | one-way ANOVA | Pre-op vs Post-1m | Pre-op vs Post-1w | Post-1w vs Post-1m | |
| Left V1 | 1.34 (0.43) | 1.62 (0.64) | 1.83 (0.57) | 9.15/< 0.005 | -6.07/< 0.0002 | -2.15/0.121 | -1.64/0.265 |
Figure 2Whole-brain LCOR analysis of Pre-op and Post-1m. (A) Statistical parametric map (axial and coronal view). (B) Surface brains (3D view). (C) The LCOR values of the left V1 at Post-1m are significantly higher than those at Pre-op (t(12) = -6.07, p< 0.001) (*** p<0.001). L, left; R, right.
Figure 3Correlation between changes in LCOR values in the left V1 and changes in VIS from the Pre-op period to the Post-1m period.
Visual network with significantly increased FC between the Post-1m and Pre-op time points.
| Network | T | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| seed | target | ||
| V5.L | V2d.L | 3.68 | <0.05 |
| V5.L | V3.L | 3.56 | <0.05 |
| V5.L | V3a.R | 3.08 | <0.05 |
| V5.L | V4.L | 2.94 | <0.05 |
| V5.L | V5.R | 2.84 | <0.05 |
L: left; R: right.
Figure 4Depictions of FC strength improved in the visual networks after surgery. (A) Circle plots depict the visual network with significantly increased FC between the Pre-op and Post-1m period (the left V5 and the left V2d, right V3a, left V3, left V4 and right V5). (B) Coefficients of five edges at the Pre-op, Post-1w and Post-1m time points (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001). l, left; r, right.
FC strengths of the edges between lV5 and lV2d, lV3, rV3a, lV4 and Rv5 at Pre-op, Post-1w and Post-1m.
| Edges | Mean (SD) | F(2,24)/p | t(12)/p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-1w | Post-1m | one-way ANOVA | Pre-op vs Post-1m | Pre-op vs Post-1w | Post-1w vs Post-1m | |
| lV5 to lV2d | 0.09 (0.17) | 0.22 (0.22) | 0.32 (0.15) | 5.48/<0.02 | -5.21/<0.01 | -2.58/0.20 | -1.87/0.41 |
| lV5 to lV3 | 0.22 (0.15) | 0.31 (0.24) | 0.46 (0.20) | 4.43/<0.05 | -5.04/<0.01 | -1.90/0.40 | -2.02/0.35 |
| lV5 to rV3a | 0.19 (0.18) | 0.43 (0.31) | 0.38 (0.22) | 7.11/<0.002 | -4.36/<0.05 | -5.29/<0.001 | 1.01/0.76 |
| lV5 to lV4 | 0.18 (0.18) | 0.38 (0.25) | 0.36 (0.24) | 5.11/<0.02 | -4.15/<0.05 | -4.24/<0.05 | 0.36/0.96 |
| lV5 to rV5 | 0.33 (0.35) | 0.50 (0.29) | 0.52 (0.32) | 3.03/0.08 | -5.02/<0.05 | -2.38/0.25 | -0.29/0.97 |
Differences in whole-brain FC determined using the left V5 as the seed at Pre-op and Post-1m.
| Region | Coordinate | Cluster size (voxels) | T | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| Left V1 | -18 | -90 | 14 | 44 | 7.65 | 0.008 |
| rOFG | 36 | -6 | -14 | 34 | 6.03 | 0.017 |
| lpSMG, | -66 | -38 | 20 | 26 | 5.75 | 0.042 |
Figure 5Whole-brain FC strength alterations after surgery determined using the left V5 as a seed. (A) Statistical parametric map between Pre-op and Post-1m (axial view, arrows point to the significantly different regions). (B) Statistical parametric map between Pre-op and Post-1m (coronal view, arrows point to the significantly different regions). (C) Surface brain between Pre-op and Post-1m (3D view). Coefficients between the left V5 and left V1 (D), rOFG (E) and lpSMG (F) at Pre-op, Post-1w and Post-1m (* p<0.05, *** p<0.001). l: left; r: right.
FC strengths of edges between lV5 and lV1, rOFG and lpSMG at Pre-op, Post-1w and Post-1m.
| Edges | Mean (SD) | F(2,24)/p | t(12)/p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-1w | Post-1m | one-way ANOVA | Pre-op vs Post-1m | Pre-op vs Post-1w | Post-1w vs Post-1m | |
| lV5 to lV1 | 0.22 (0.11) | 0.39 (0.19) | 0.47 (0.15) | 12.96/<0.0003 | -8.53/<0.0002 | -4.21/<0.05 | -2.24/0.29 |
| lV5 to rOFG | 0.17 (0.17) | 0.32 (0.26) | 0.41 (0.22) | 10.85/<0.001 | -8.133/0.0002 | -3.71/0.054 | -2.21/0.29 |
| lV5 to lpSMG | 0.08 (0.10) | 0.01 (0.11) | 0.11 (0.12) | 13.41/<0.0007 | -10.82/<0.0001 | 2.98/0.13 | -3.58/0.06 |