Literature DB >> 17904493

Functional vision loss: a diagnosis of exclusion.

Rex B Villegas1, Pauline F Ilsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most cases of visual acuity or visual field loss can be attributed to ocular pathology or ocular manifestations of systemic pathology. They can also occasionally be attributed to nonpathologic processes or malingering. Functional vision loss is any decrease in vision the origin of which cannot be attributed to a pathologic or structural abnormality. CASE REPORTS: Two cases of functional vision loss are described. In the first, a 58-year-old man presented for a baseline eye examination for enrollment in a vision rehabilitation program. He reported bilateral blindness since a motor vehicle accident with head trauma 4 years prior. Entering visual acuity was "no light perception" in each eye. Ocular health examination was normal and the patient made frequent eye contact with the examiners. He was referred for neuroimaging and electrophysiologic testing. The second case was a 49-year-old man who presented with a long history of intermittent monocular diplopia. His medical history was significant for psycho-medical evaluations and a diagnosis of factitious disorder. Entering uncorrected visual acuities were 20/20 in each eye, but visual field testing found constriction. No abnormalities were found that could account for the monocular diplopia or visual field deficit. A diagnosis of functional vision loss secondary to factitious disorder was made.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional vision loss is a diagnosis of exclusion. In the event of reduced vision in the context of a normal ocular health examination, all other pathology must be ruled out before making the diagnosis of functional vision loss. Evaluation must include auxiliary ophthalmologic testing, neuroimaging of the visual pathway, review of the medical history and lifestyle, and psychiatric evaluation. Comanagement with a psychiatrist is essential for patients with functional vision loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904493     DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2007.04.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optometry        ISSN: 1558-1527


  7 in total

1.  The diagnosis of exclusion: an ongoing uncertainty.

Authors:  Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

2.  Objective measurement of visual resolution using the P300 to self-facial images.

Authors:  David J Marhöfer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Progressive severe bilateral loss of vision in a relatively young patient: Think beyond malingering.

Authors:  Avinash Mishra; Sandeep Shankar; T S Ahluwalia; Raghudev Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-06-25

4.  Faces are more attractive than motion: evidence from two simultaneous oddball paradigms.

Authors:  David J Marhöfer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Normal sensory and absent cognitive electrophysiological responses in functional visual loss following chemical eye burn.

Authors:  Nada Jiraskova; Miroslav Kuba; Jan Kremlacek; Pavel Rozsival
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Malingering or simulation in ophthalmology-visual acuity.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Incesu; Güngör Sobacı
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Tests for malingering in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Incesu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.