Literature DB >> 16140382

Functional visual loss in adults and children patient characteristics, management, and outcomes.

Su Ann Lim1, R Michael Siatkowski, Bradley K Farris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of functional visual loss (FVL) in adults and children.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty patients diagnosed with FVL over a 5-year period.
METHODS: Medical records of these patients were reviewed and data analyzed using statistical software. OUTCOME: Demographics, underlying organic and psychiatric disease, concomitant psychosocial events, and resolution rates were studied.
RESULTS: Functional visual loss, with or without functional overlay, was initially diagnosed in 140 patients and was, in retrospect, a correct diagnosis in 138. There were 56 (40.6%) children and 82 (59.4%) adults (mean age, 13.4 and 40.0 years). The gender ratio, incidence of concomitant psychosocial events, incidence of functional overlay, prevalence of migraine or facial pain, and proportion referred for counseling were similar in the 2 groups. Concomitant psychosocial events were primarily social in children and related to trauma in adults. Thirty-two (39.0%) adults had a history of psychiatric illness, versus 10 (17.9%) children (P = 0.008). Symptoms were bilateral in 65.0% of cases. Functional visual loss manifested as visual acuity (VA) loss only occurred in 26.1% of patients, FVL manifested as visual field (VF) loss only was present in 28.3% of patients, and FVL with loss of both VA and VF occurred in 45.6% of patients. There was no significant difference in children versus adults in the proportion of VA, VF, or both being affected. Functional visual loss with coexistent organic disease (functional overlay) was present in 16.7% of patients. Follow-up information was available for 26.1% of patients. Normalization of any one parameter occurred in 58.3% of patients and was more likely in children. Three patients (2.2%) originally felt to have solely functional disease were subsequently diagnosed with organic disease.
CONCLUSION: Functional visual loss is most common in teenagers, is typically bilateral, and involves both VA and VF. Normal VA was proven half the time at initial consultation. At all ages, patients were predominantly female, and one fifth had migraine, facial pain, or coexistent organic pathology. Concomitant psychosocial events were mainly social in children and related to trauma in adults. Psychiatric disease was twice as likely in adults. Normalization of visual function occurred in a majority of patients. Early-onset macular dystrophies and hereditary optic neuropathies may be misdiagnosed as FVL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16140382     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  Bilateral Concurrent Eye Examination with a Head-Mounted Perimeter for Diagnosing Functional Visual Loss.

Authors:  Toshiaki Goseki; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2016-09-20

2.  Non-organic Vision Loss in the Afghanistan and Iraq Conflicts.

Authors:  Kevin M Broderick; Thomas B Ableman; Eric D Weber; Robert W Enzenauer; Harold J Wain; Keith J Wroblewski
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-03-30

3.  Medically unexplained visual loss in children and young people: an observational single site study of incidence and outcomes.

Authors:  M C Daniel; A Coughtrey; I Heyman; A H Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Malingering or simulation in ophthalmology-visual acuity.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Incesu; Güngör Sobacı
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Functional visual loss.

Authors:  Beau B Bruce; Nancy J Newman
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Accommodative spasm in siblings: a unique finding.

Authors:  Robert P Rutstein
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Tests for malingering in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Incesu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  A comparison of idiopathic intracranial hypertension with and without papilledema.

Authors:  Kathleen B Digre; Beau K Nakamoto; Judith E A Warner; Wendy J Langeberg; Susan K Baggaley; Bradley J Katz
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 9.  Mental stress as consequence and cause of vision loss: the dawn of psychosomatic ophthalmology for preventive and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel; Jiaqi Wang; Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Muneeb Faiq; Christine Heim
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Non-organic Visual Loss in Patients with Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Rod Foroozan
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.