Literature DB >> 22542972

The limits to parapatric speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in a continent-island model.

Claudia Bank1, Reinhard Bürger, Joachim Hermisson.   

Abstract

How much gene flow is needed to inhibit speciation by the accumulation of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities (DMIs) in a structured population? Here, we derive these limits in a classical migration-selection model with two haploid or diploid loci and unidirectional gene flow from a continent to an island. We discuss the dependence of the maximum gene-flow rate on ecological factors (exogeneous selection), genetic factors (epistasis, recombination), and the evolutionary history. Extensive analytical and numerical results show the following: (1) The maximum rate of gene flow is limited by exogeneous selection. In particular, maintenance of neutral DMIs is impossible with gene flow. (2) There are two distinct mechanisms that drive DMI evolution in parapatry, selection against immigrants in a heterogeneous environment and selection against hybrids due to the incompatibility. (3) Depending on the mechanism, opposite predictions result concerning the genetic architecture that maximizes the rate of gene flow a DMI can sustain. Selection against immigrants favors evolution of tightly linked DMIs of arbitrary strength, whereas selection against hybrids promotes the evolution of strong unlinked DMIs. In diploids, the fitness of the double heterozygotes is the decisive factor to predict the pattern of DMI stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542972      PMCID: PMC3389979          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.137513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  39 in total

1.  Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation.

Authors:  M Turelli; H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement.

Authors:  P Nosil; B J Crespi; C P Sandoval
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The polymorphic prelude to Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Establishment and maintenance of adaptive genetic divergence under migration, selection, and drift.

Authors:  Sam Yeaman; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  EFFECTIVE DEME SIZES DURING LONG-TERM EVOLUTION ESTIMATED FROM RATES OF CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENT.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations.

Authors:  N Barton; B O Bengtsson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Application of method of small parameters to multi-niche population genetic models.

Authors:  S Karlin; J McGregor
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Equilibrium studies of two locus haploid populations with recombination.

Authors:  M W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves; Lakshmi Balagopalan; Susan M Abmayr; H Allen Orr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The effects of linkage and gene flow on local adaptation: a two-locus continent-island model.

Authors:  Reinhard Bürger; Ada Akerman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 1.514

View more
  48 in total

1.  Signatures of Dobzhansky-Muller Incompatibilities in the Genomes of Recombinant Inbred Lines.

Authors:  Maria Colomé-Tatché; Frank Johannes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Role of Standing Variation in Geographic Convergent Adaptation.

Authors:  Peter L Ralph; Graham Coop
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  When Does Frequency-Independent Selection Maintain Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Sebastian Novak; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process.

Authors:  Jenn M Coughlan; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Multi-locus interactions and the build-up of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  I Satokangas; S H Martin; H Helanterä; J Saramäki; J Kulmuni
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Evolutionary dynamics of pre- and postzygotic reproductive isolation in cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Sina J Rometsch; Julián Torres-Dowdall; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A stochastic model for speciation by mating preferences.

Authors:  Camille Coron; Manon Costa; Hélène Leman; Charline Smadi
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Probing the ecological and evolutionary history of a thermophilic cyanobacterial population via statistical properties of its microdiversity.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Michelle Davison; Daniel S Fisher; Devaki Bhaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adaptive Introgression across Semipermeable Species Boundaries between Local Helicoverpa zea and Invasive Helicoverpa armigera Moths.

Authors:  Wendy A Valencia-Montoya; Samia Elfekih; Henry L North; Joana I Meier; Ian A Warren; Wee Tek Tay; Karl H J Gordon; Alexandre Specht; Silvana V Paula-Moraes; Rahul Rane; Tom K Walsh; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  The evolution of hybrid incompatibilities along a phylogeny.

Authors:  Richard J Wang; Cécile Ané; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.