Literature DB >> 24094342

The evolution of hybrid incompatibilities along a phylogeny.

Richard J Wang1, Cécile Ané, Bret A Payseur.   

Abstract

The Dobzhansky-Muller model of speciation posits that defects in hybrids between species are the result of negative epistatic interactions between alleles that arose in independent genetic backgrounds. Tests of one important prediction from this model, that incompatibilities "snowball," have relied on comparisons of the number of incompatibilities between closely related pairs of species separated by different divergence times. How incompatibilities accumulate along phylogenies, however, remains poorly understood. We extend the Dobzhansky-Muller model to multispecies clades to describe the mathematical relationship between tree topology and the number of shared incompatibilities among related pairs of species. We use these results to develop a statistical test that distinguishes between the snowball and alternative incompatibility accumulation models, including nonepistatic and multilocus incompatibility models, in a phylogenetic context. We further demonstrate that patterns of incompatibility sharing across species pairs can be used to estimate the relative frequencies of different types of incompatibilities, including derived-derived versus derived-ancestral incompatibilities. Our results and statistical methods should motivate comparative genetic mapping of hybrid incompatibilities to evaluate competing models of speciation.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities; phylogenetic comparison; reproductive isolation; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094342      PMCID: PMC3801299          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  62 in total

1.  Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization.

Authors:  H A Orr; S Irving
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The evolution of F1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds.

Authors:  Trevor D Price; Michelle M Bouvier
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Pervasive adaptive evolution among interactors of the Drosophila hybrid inviability gene, Nup96.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana.

Authors:  David Bikard; Dhaval Patel; Claire Le Metté; Veronica Giorgi; Christine Camilleri; Malcolm J Bennett; Olivier Loudet
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Lee; Jui-Yu Chou; Liplee Cheong; Nai-Hsin Chang; Shi-Yow Yang; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Comparative genetics of hybrid incompatibility: sterility in two Solanum species crosses.

Authors:  Leonie C Moyle; Takuya Nakazato
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evidence for complex genic interactions between conspecific chromosomes underlying hybrid female sterility in the Drosophila simulans clade.

Authors:  A W Davis; E G Noonburg; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mapping quantitative trait loci onto a phylogenetic tree.

Authors:  Karl W Broman; Sungjin Kim; Saunak Sen; Cécile Ané; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The limits to parapatric speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in a continent-island model.

Authors:  Claudia Bank; Reinhard Bürger; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  11 in total

1.  Macroevolutionary speciation rates are decoupled from the evolution of intrinsic reproductive isolation in Drosophila and birds.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Moving Speciation Genetics Forward: Modern Techniques Build on Foundational Studies in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Pace of Hybrid Incompatibility Evolution in House Mice.

Authors:  Richard J Wang; Michael A White; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Predictability and parallelism in the contemporary evolution of hybrid genomes.

Authors:  Quinn K Langdon; Daniel L Powell; Bernard Kim; Shreya M Banerjee; Cheyenne Payne; Tristram O Dodge; Ben Moran; Paola Fascinetto-Zago; Molly Schumer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  The Evolution of Polymorphic Hybrid Incompatibilities in House Mice.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Dan Vanderpool; Brice A J Sarver; Colin Callahan; Sara Keeble; Lorraine L Provencio; Michael D Kessler; Vanessa Stewart; Erin Nordquist; Matthew D Dean; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Stage-specific disruption of X chromosome expression during spermatogenesis in sterile house mouse hybrids.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Emily E K Kopania; Kelsie E Hunnicutt; Dan Vanderpool; Sara Keeble; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.542

7.  Hybrid breakdown in cichlid fish.

Authors:  Rike Bahati Stelkens; Corinne Schmid; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimating the duration of speciation from phylogenies.

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; Hélène Morlon; Amaury Lambert
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Darwinism for the Genomic Age: Connecting Mutation to Diversification.

Authors:  Xia Hua; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Interspecific tests of allelism reveal the evolutionary timing and pattern of accumulation of reproductive isolation mutations.

Authors:  Natasha A Sherman; Anna Victorine; Richard J Wang; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.