Literature DB >> 15185879

Post-test calibration of single-use, antimony, 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH probes is necessary.

James L Wise1, Patricia K Kammer, Joseph A Murray.   

Abstract

Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring is considered the "gold standard" for detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, reference pH can drift during studies using antimony pH electrodes. Posttest calibration of antimony probes to assess a "drift" has been advocated but is not routinely preformed in clinical practice. We undertook this study to determine the frequency and degree of drift that occurs during pH studies using single-use antimony pH electrodes. One hundred consecutive 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH studies were reviewed for presence and degree of pH drift. Separately, 10 in vitro studies using antimony electrodes exposed to solution of constant pH and temperature were recorded to determine timing of drift. Drift of at least 0.1 pH unit occurred in 88 (P < 0.001). Drift of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and > 0.4 pH unit occurred in 38, 28, 15, 4, and 5 of the 100 studies, respectively. In six studies the adjustment for the poststudy calibration drift changed the overall interpretation of the test. Small degrees of drift occurred at various times during the 10 in vitro studies. Drift in pH during 24-hr pH studies using antimony is common, but large degrees of drift are not. When the threshold of pH 4.0 was adjusted to reflect the drift, a small but significant number of interpretations changed. Drift artifact may impact the results of the pH study, and calibration should be repeated after all studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15185879     DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000026319.79368.b8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  10 in total

1.  Alkaline oesophageal reflux--an artefact due to oxygen corrosion of antimony pH electrodes.

Authors:  F Sjöberg; U Gustafsson; L Tibbling
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino; M Moretti; A Sumberaz; G Bonifacino; P Zentilin; E Caputo; G Villa; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Comparative study of glass and antimony electrodes for continuous oesophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; R Helven; H Goyvaerts
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L A Szarka; K R DeVault; J A Murray
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities.

Authors:  R Fass; R Hell; R E Sampliner; G Pulliam; E Graver; V Hartz; C Johnson; P Jaffe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Antimony electrodes. Mucosal potential differences and buffer composition adversely affect pH measurements in the stomach.

Authors:  A R Opekun; J L Smith; D Y Graham
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Clinical and economic assessment of the omeprazole test in patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R Fass; J J Ofman; I M Gralnek; C Johnson; E Camargo; R E Sampliner; M B Fennerty
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-11

Review 8.  Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: technique, interpretations, and clinical indications.

Authors:  Radha K Dhiman; Vivek A Saraswat; Subhash R Naik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Exclusion of meal periods from ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring may improve diagnosis of esophageal acid reflux.

Authors:  J M Wo; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  The clinical and economic value of a short course of omeprazole in patients with noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  R Fass; M B Fennerty; J J Ofman; I M Gralnek; C Johnson; E Camargo; R E Sampliner
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 22.682

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A novel placement method of the Bravo wireless pH monitoring capsule for measuring intragastric pH.

Authors:  Jae Hyuck Chang; Myung Gyu Choi; Dong-Seok Yim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Park; In Seok Lee; Sang Woo Kim; In Sik Chung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Discounting the duration of bolus exposure in impedance testing underestimates acid reflux.

Authors:  Namasivayam Vikneswaran; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.