Literature DB >> 2781238

Gastric aspiration versus antimony and glass pH electrodes. A simultaneous comparative in vivo study.

V Savarino1, G S Mela, P Zentilin, M R Magnolia, P Scalabrini, F Valle, M Moretti, G Bonifacino, G Celle.   

Abstract

To carry out a simultaneous comparison of the 24-h in vivo performance of antimony and glass electrodes and the findings of intermittent gastric aspiration, a triple-probe system with closely adjacent tips was positioned in the gastric corpus of 10 subjects representing different clinical and pharmacologic conditions. We showed that pH values measured with the antimony and the glass units were well correlated to those assessed in gastric aspirates (rs = 0.87; b = 1.079; a = -0.33; and rs = 0.85; b = 1.121; a = -0.38, respectively). A proportional correlation (rs = 0.86; b = 0.97; a = 0.02) was also found between the two intraluminal pH measurements. With regard to the error frequency distributions obtained by comparing the three measuring systems two at a time, the pH pairs differed by no more than 1 pH unit in most cases (greater than 90%). It can be concluded that antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-h intragastric acidity studies in man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2781238     DOI: 10.3109/00365528909093071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  16 in total

1.  Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino; M Moretti; A Sumberaz; G Bonifacino; P Zentilin; E Caputo; G Villa; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Omeprazole in gastric and duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; G Celle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  H2 antagonist and omeprazole nonresponders.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; S Vigneri; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Omeprazole in H2 blocker non-responders.

Authors:  V Savarino; G Mela; A Sumberaz; G Celle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Assessment of gastric acidity in intensive care patients: intermittent pH registration cannot replace continuous pH monitoring.

Authors:  M J Bonten; C A Gaillard; R W Stockbrügger; F H van Tiel; S van der Geest; E E Stobberingh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Ulcer heterogeneity: further arguments for a range of antisecretory treatment.

Authors:  V Savarino; P Zentilin; G Celle; G S Mela
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Circadian gastric acidity and Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; C Mansi; M R Mele; N Pandolfo; V Pugliese; S Vigneri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Acid and gastric metaplasia in the duodenum.

Authors:  V Savarino; G Mela; G Celle; S Vigneri
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  New method for improving accuracy of 24-hour continuous intragastric pH-metry. Reflections on physiological and pharmacological studies.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino; A Malesci; F Di Mario; P Sossai; S Vigneri; A Zambotti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Comparison of low-dose antacids, cimetidine, and placebo on 24-hour intragastric acidity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  R Weberg; A Berstad; M Osnes
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.