Literature DB >> 22531173

Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?

Hillary M Ross1, Oleksandr N Kryvenko, Janet E Cowan, Jeffry P Simko, Thomas M Wheeler, Jonathan I Epstein.   

Abstract

Although rare, there are cases within reported series of men with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 on radical prostatectomies that show pelvic lymph node (LN) metastases. However, there are no studies on whether pelvic LN metastases occur in tumors with GS ≤6 using the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) updated GS system. We performed a search of the radical prostatectomy databases at 4 large academic centers for cases of GS ≤6. Only prostatectomies submitted and embedded in entirety with pelvic LN dissections were included. A combined total of 14,123 cases were identified, of which 22 cases had a positive LN. Histopathologic review of 19 cases (3 cases unavailable for review) showed higher grade than originally reported by the pathologists in all cases. Of the 17 pre-ISUP reviewed cases, 2 were upgraded to 4+3=7 with both cribriform and poorly formed glands. One case was upgraded to 4+3=7 with tertiary pattern 5 displaying cribriform glands, poorly formed glands, and cords of single cells. Eleven cases were upgraded to 3+4=7 with glomeruloid structures and small to large cribriform glands (1 of these also had features of ductal adenocarcinoma). Two cases had tertiary pattern 4 with small cribriform glands. One case had a prominent colloid component that would currently be graded as 4+5=9 because of large cribriform glands and solid sheets of cells within the mucin. Of the 2 post-ISUP cases, 1 demonstrated tertiary pattern 4, and the other showed GS 3+4=7 with irregular cribriform glands. Undergrading is the primary reason for LN positivity with GS ≤6, which has decreased significantly since the adoption of the ISUP grading system in 2005. Of over 14,000 totally embedded radical prostatectomies from multiple institutions, there was not a single case of a GS ≤6 tumor with LN metastases. In contrast to prevailing assumptions, GS ≤6 tumors do not appear to metastasize to LNs. Rather, Gleason pattern 4 or 5, as better defined by the current ISUP updated grading system, is required for metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22531173      PMCID: PMC3421030          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182556dcd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  35 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system.

Authors:  C C Pan; S R Potter; A W Partin; J I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Jan Schmitges; Maxine Sun; Rodolphe Thuret; Orchidee Djahangirian; Zhe Tian; Shahrokh F Shariat; Alberto Briganti; Paul Perrotte; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?

Authors:  I M van Oort; B M Schout; L A L M Kiemeney; C A Hulsbergen; J A Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective.

Authors:  D F Gleason
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eyas M Hattab; Michael O Koch; John N Eble; Haiqun Lin; Liang Cheng
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason 7 prostate cancer predicts pathological stage and biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Hong Gee Sim; Donatello Telesca; Stephen H Culp; William J Ellis; Paul H Lange; Lawrence D True; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Claudio A Mosse; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Analysis of cribriform morphology in prostatic neoplasia using antibody to high-molecular-weight cytokeratins.

Authors:  M B Amin; D S Schultz; R J Zarbo
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Ganesh S Palapattu; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  86 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  [Clarification regarding criticism on PREFERE].

Authors:  M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; L Egevad; M Amin; B Delahunt; J R Srigley; P A Humphrey; J I Epstein
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nima Nassiri; Daniel J Margolis; Shyam Natarajan; Devi S Sharma; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population Health.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Ketan Badani; Daniel A Barocas; Glen W Barrisford; Jed-Sian Cheng; Arnold I Chin; Anthony Corcoran; Jonathan I Epstein; Arvin K George; Gopal N Gupta; Matthew H Hayn; Eric C Kauffman; Brian Lane; Michael A Liss; Moben Mirza; Todd M Morgan; Kelvin Moses; Kenneth G Nepple; Mark A Preston; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Matthew J Resnick; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Jonathan Silberstein; Eric A Singer; Geoffrey A Sonn; Preston Sprenkle; Kelly L Stratton; Jennifer Taylor; Jeffrey Tomaszewski; Matt Tollefson; Andrew Vickers; Wesley M White; William T Lowrance
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prostate cancer: Is prostatectomy for Gleason score 6 a treatment failure?

Authors:  Theodorus H van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  [Is there still a role for active surveillance in prostate cancer?]

Authors:  M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Integrated analysis of the genomic instability of PTEN in clinically insignificant and significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen J Murphy; Robert J Karnes; Farhad Kosari; B Edgardo R Parilla Castellar; Benjamin R Kipp; Sarah H Johnson; Simone Terra; Faye R Harris; Geoffrey C Halling; Janet L Schaefer Klein; Aqsa Nasir; Eric Bergstrahl; Laureano J Rangel; William R Sukov; George Vasmatzis; John C Cheville
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 10.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.