Literature DB >> 15104304

The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Claudio A Mosse1, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Jonathan I Epstein.   

Abstract

In the Gleason grading system for prostatic cancer only the two most prevalent patterns are reported, although a third (tertiary) pattern grade may be present. We compared the pathologic stage of 227 radical prostatectomies with tertiary pattern 5 to the pathologic stage of 604 radical prostatectomies lacking a tertiary component. Gleason score 3 + 4 tumors with a tertiary pattern of 5 were more likely to present with higher stage disease than those Gleason score 3 + 4 tumors without a tertiary component (P = 0.012) and at a stage similar to Gleason score 3 + 5 tumors. Gleason score 4 + 3 tumors with a tertiary pattern of 5 were less likely to be organ-confined than Gleason score 4 + 3 tumors (P = 0.02) and less likely to have lymph node metastases than Gleason score 4 + 4 tumors (P = 0.027). However, Gleason score 4 + 4 with a tertiary pattern of 5 were indistinguishable from Gleason score 4 + 4 tumors. The relative effects of a tertiary pattern of 5 were greatest when the primary and secondary stages were low but become obscured by the already aggressive nature of advanced primary and secondary patterns. Therefore, except for very high-grade tumors, tertiary scoring of prostatic adenocarcinoma at radical prostatectomy should be reported as it has prognostic significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104304     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200403000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  18 in total

1.  Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumour variant unrecognized on T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Niamh Coffey; Previn Gulavita; Omran Al-Dandan; Wael Shabana; Trevor A Flood
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Gregor Mikuz; Rafael J Luque; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?

Authors:  Hillary M Ross; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Janet E Cowan; Jeffry P Simko; Thomas M Wheeler; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  What is the pathologist saying? Interpretation of the prostate pathology report.

Authors:  Omar Hameed
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Andres Matoso; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Effect of Gleason scores of lymph node metastases on prognosis of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kyungtae Ko; In Gab Jeong; Woo Suk Choi; Ju Hyun Lim; Ja Hee Suh; Ja Hyeon Ku; Yangsoon Park; Kyung Cheol Moon; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Choung-Soo Kim; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

8.  Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Charles C Guo; Mark L Gonzalgo; Ahmed Magheli; Stacy Loeb; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Clinical significance of prospectively assigned Gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chirag Doshi; Michael Vacchio; Kristopher Attwood; Christine Murekeyisoni; Diana C Mehedint; Shervin Badkhshan; Gissou Azabdaftari; Norbert Sule; Khurshid A Guru; James L Mohler; Eric C Kauffman
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.