INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of the study was to describe the transvaginal approach utilizing the existing sacral colpopexy (SC) graft for recurrent apical prolapse following failed SC. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with recurrent vaginal vault prolapse following a prior SC were treated between January 2000 and December 2009. Twelve patients had a standard uterosacral ligament cuff suspension (USLS) performed. In ten patients, the vaginal cuff was suspended to the left uterosacral ligament and reattached to the graft material from the prior SC. One of these ten subsequently failed and a standard USLS was performed. Patient characteristics, preoperative pelvic floor assessment, operative information, and postoperative follow-up were collected. Cases in which the graft material was used were compared with those undergoing standard USLS. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and preoperative Baden-Walker scores were similar. Of 23 cases, 21 (91 %) were a consequence of graft separation from the vagina and not the sacrum. Two of nine patients with follow-up where the SC graft was utilized transvaginally had recurrent prolapse. One required reoperation. Of 13 patients in the group that underwent traditional USLS, 2 had asymptomatic recurrent anterior prolapse; neither required additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A transvaginal surgical approach for recurrent vaginal prolapse after a history of failed abdominal SC should be considered. If feasible, the SC graft material can be used when performing USLS instead of the right uterosacral ligament for these patients with a prior history of abdominal SC.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of the study was to describe the transvaginal approach utilizing the existing sacral colpopexy (SC) graft for recurrent apical prolapse following failed SC. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with recurrent vaginal vault prolapse following a prior SC were treated between January 2000 and December 2009. Twelve patients had a standard uterosacral ligament cuff suspension (USLS) performed. In ten patients, the vaginal cuff was suspended to the left uterosacral ligament and reattached to the graft material from the prior SC. One of these ten subsequently failed and a standard USLS was performed. Patient characteristics, preoperative pelvic floor assessment, operative information, and postoperative follow-up were collected. Cases in which the graft material was used were compared with those undergoing standard USLS. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and preoperative Baden-Walker scores were similar. Of 23 cases, 21 (91 %) were a consequence of graft separation from the vagina and not the sacrum. Two of nine patients with follow-up where the SC graft was utilized transvaginally had recurrent prolapse. One required reoperation. Of 13 patients in the group that underwent traditional USLS, 2 had asymptomatic recurrent anterior prolapse; neither required additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A transvaginal surgical approach for recurrent vaginal prolapse after a history of failed abdominal SC should be considered. If feasible, the SC graft material can be used when performing USLS instead of the right uterosacral ligament for these patients with a prior history of abdominal SC.
Authors: W Andre Silva; Rachel N Pauls; Jeffrey L Segal; Christopher M Rooney; Steven D Kleeman; Mickey M Karram Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Anthony Visco; Anne M Weber; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Paul Fine; Chiara Ghetti; Morton B Brown Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Patrick J Culligan; Miles Murphy; Linda Blackwell; Grant Hammons; Carol Graham; Michael H Heit Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 8.661