Literature DB >> 12501049

Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh.

Patrick J Culligan1, Miles Murphy, Linda Blackwell, Grant Hammons, Carol Graham, Michael H Heit.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the minimum meaningful study period required for prospective trials involving sacral colpopexy. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of 245 patients who underwent sacral colpopexy. Postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantitation was our objective end point. In an effort to control for selection bias, patients who returned for postoperative examinations were compared with those who did not for clinical and demographic information. A validated prolapse-specific quality of life instrument was used to determine the subjective end points.
RESULTS: Objective failure (any postoperative POP-Q point > or = stage II) was found in 37 (15.1%) patients. Of these, 26 (70.3%) occurred within 6 months, and 30 (81.1%) occurred within 1 year. Another 5 objective failures were discovered between 1 and 2 years after surgery for a total of 94.6% of failures occurring within 2 years. There were no clinically significant differences between the groups of women with and without objective postoperative follow-up, indicating minimal selection bias.
CONCLUSION: It is reasonable to construct randomized controlled trials involving sacral colpopexy that only include 1- or 2-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12501049     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.129160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  50 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of current biologic meshes in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Will hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy increase the rate of polypropylene mesh erosion?

Authors:  Serge P Marinkovic
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-08-04

4.  [Prolapse surgery].

Authors:  K P Jünemann; M Hamann; C Seif
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  [Vaginal descensus and prolapse. Which operative technique?].

Authors:  M F Hamann; C Seif
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy--a single centre's experience.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jan Paul Roovers; Paul Lewi; Jasper Verguts; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-29

Review 8.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Short-term results of robotic sacrocolpopexy using the Quill SRS bi-directional polydioxanone (PDO) suture.

Authors:  Joseph T Stubbs
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.