Nir Haya1, Malachy Maher, Emma Ballard. 1. The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and Wesley Hospitals, Brisbane, Australia, nirhaya1@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: As sacral colpopexy (SC) is increasingly utilised in the surgical management of apical prolapse, we will undoubtedly be asked to manage recurrent prolapse after SC. We present a four-step technique of performing a repeated laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) for the surgical management of recurrent upper vaginal prolapse after SC surgery. METHODS: Between July 2012 and July 2013 women presenting with symptomatic post-SC vault prolapse were prospectively evaluated. Peri-operative morbidity and short-term complications were recorded. Surgical outcomes were objectively assessed utilising the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). RESULTS: Five women underwent LSC. Extensive adhesiolysis was required in three patients and the dissection was characterised by marked fibrosis. The mesh remained attached to the sacrum and had limited contact with the anterior vagina and vault in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 8.5 months all women had resolution of the awareness of prolapse, less than stage 2 prolapse on examination and high levels of satisfaction on PGI-I. CONCLUSIONS: While the repeat LSC is feasible, safe and effective, adhesions and marked fibrosis make this a challenging intervention. Further evaluation is required.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: As sacral colpopexy (SC) is increasingly utilised in the surgical management of apical prolapse, we will undoubtedly be asked to manage recurrent prolapse after SC. We present a four-step technique of performing a repeated laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) for the surgical management of recurrent upper vaginal prolapse after SC surgery. METHODS: Between July 2012 and July 2013 women presenting with symptomatic post-SC vault prolapse were prospectively evaluated. Peri-operative morbidity and short-term complications were recorded. Surgical outcomes were objectively assessed utilising the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). RESULTS: Five women underwent LSC. Extensive adhesiolysis was required in three patients and the dissection was characterised by marked fibrosis. The mesh remained attached to the sacrum and had limited contact with the anterior vagina and vault in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 8.5 months all women had resolution of the awareness of prolapse, less than stage 2 prolapse on examination and high levels of satisfaction on PGI-I. CONCLUSIONS: While the repeat LSC is feasible, safe and effective, adhesions and marked fibrosis make this a challenging intervention. Further evaluation is required.
Authors: Jessica N Bracken; Diana H Tran; Thomas J Kuehl; Wilma Larsen; Paul M Yandell; Bobby L Shull Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 2.894