Literature DB >> 16880293

Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes.

W Andre Silva1, Rachel N Pauls, Jeffrey L Segal, Christopher M Rooney, Steven D Kleeman, Mickey M Karram.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the five-year anatomic and functional outcomes of the high uterosacral vaginal vault suspension.
METHODS: One hundred ten patients with advanced symptomatic uterovaginal or posthysterectomy prolapse treated between January 1997 and January 2000 were identified and 72 (65%) consented to participate in this study. Anatomic outcomes were obtained by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification. Functional results were obtained subjectively and with quality-of-life questionnaires, including the short-form Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI), and Female Sexual Function Index.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (range 3.5-7.5 years). Vaginal hysterectomy (37.5%), anterior colporrhaphy (58.3%), posterior colporrhaphy (87.5%), and suburethral slings (31.9%) were performed as indicated. Surgical failure (symptomatic recurrent prolapse of stage 2 or greater in one or more segments) was 11 of 72 (15.3%). Two patients (2.8%) had recurrence of apical prolapse of stage 2 or greater. For those sexually active preoperatively and postoperatively (n=34), mean postoperative Female Sexual Function Index scores for arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain were normal, whereas the desire score was abnormal (mean= 3.2). However, 94% (n=29) were currently satisfied with their sexual activity. Postoperative IIQ/UDI scores were significantly improved in all three domains (irritative, P= .01; obstructive, P<.001; stress, P=.03) and overall (IIQ-7, P<.001; UDI, P<.001) compared with preoperatively. Bowel dysfunction occurred 33.3% preoperatively compared with 27.8% postoperatively (P=.24).
CONCLUSION: Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault fixation seems to be a durable procedure for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Lower urinary tract, bowel, and sexual function may be maintained or improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16880293     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000224610.83158.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  45 in total

Review 1.  Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

Authors:  E J Stanford; A Cassidenti; M D Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  High uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension: comparison of absorbable vs. permanent suture for apical fixation.

Authors:  Seshadri Kasturi; Miriam Bentley-Taylor; Patrick J Woodman; Colin L Terry; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament.

Authors:  Dzung Vu; Bernard T Haylen; Kelly Tse; Annabelle Farnsworth
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The rectovaginal septum: visible on magnetic resonance images of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (Müllerian agenesis).

Authors:  Markus Huebner; Katharina Rall; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Christl Reisenauer; Katja Claudia Siegmann-Luz; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Sexual function before and after sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Halina M Zyczynski; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Nancy K Janz; Holly E Richter; Patricia A Wren; Morton B Brown; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Posterior compartment anatomy as seen in magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction from asymptomatic nulliparas.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Shawn Menefee; Peggy Norton; Diane Borello-France; Edward Varner; Joseph Schaffer; Alison Weidner; Xiao Xu; Cathie Spino; Anne Weber
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Midline uterosacral plication anterior colporrhaphy combo (MUSPACC): preliminary surgical report.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Vivian Yang; Dzung Vu; Kelly Tse
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Charles R Rardin; Elisabeth A Erekson; Vivian W Sung; Renee M Ward; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Functional Outcomes for Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery.

Authors:  Saya Segal; Lily A Arya; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.