Literature DB >> 19337757

A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Per Ekman1, Hans Möller, Adel Shalabi, Yiang Xiao Yu, Rune Hedlund.   

Abstract

The existence and importance of an accelerated adjacent segment disc degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion have previously not been demonstrated by RCTs. The objectives of this study were, to determine whether lumbar fusion in the long term accelerates degenerative changes in the adjacent disc and whether this affects the outcome, by using a prospective randomised design. A total of 111 patients, aged 18-55, with isthmic spondylolisthesis were randomised to exercise (EX, n = 34) or posterolateral fusion (PLF, n = 77), with (n = 37) or without pedicle screw instrumentation (n = 40). The minimum 10 years FU rate was 72%, with a mean FU time of 12.6 years (range 10-17 years). Three radiographic methods of ASD quantification were used, i.e. two digital radiographic measurement methods and the semi quantitative UCLA grading scale. One digital measurement method showed a mean disc height reduction by 2% in the EX group and by 15% in the PLF group (p = 0.0016), and the other showed 0.5 mm more disc height reduction in the PLF compared to the Ex group (ns). The UCLA grading scale showed normal discs in 100% of patients in the EX group, compared to 62% in the PLF group (p = 0.026). There were no significant differences between instrumented and non-instrumented patients. In patients with laminectomy we found a significantly higher incidence of ASD compared to non laminectomised patients (22/47 vs. 2/16 respectively, p = 0.015). In the longitudinal analysis, the posterior and anterior disc heights were significantly reduced in the PLF group, whereas in the EX group only the posterior disc height was significantly reduced. Except for global outcome, which was significantly better for patients without ASD, the clinical outcome was not statistically different in patients with and without ASD. In conclusion, the long-term RCT shows that fusion accelerates degenerative changes at the adjacent level compared with natural history. The study suggests that not only fusion, but also laminectomy may be of pathogenetic importance. The clinical importance of ASD seems limited, with only the more severe forms affecting the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337757      PMCID: PMC2899511          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0947-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  53 in total

1.  Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine.

Authors:  C S Chen; C K Cheng; C L Liu; W H Lo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Assessment of non-invasive intervertebral motion measurements in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kristin Zhao; Chao Yang; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  S L Weinhoffer; R D Guyer; M Herbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated operatively or conservatively: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  S Seitsalo; D Schlenzka; M Poussa; K Osterman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Zisis Papazisis; Georgios Koureas; Elias Lambiris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion.

Authors:  M F Hambly; L L Wiltse; N Raghavan; G Schneiderman; C Koenig
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF.

Authors:  Shin'ya Okuda; Motoki Iwasaki; Akira Miyauchi; Hiroyuki Aono; Masahiro Morita; Tomio Yamamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; E N Hanley; J Howe; D Kuhlmann; R E Matteri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Thomas W Throckmorton; Alan S Hilibrand; Gregory A Mencio; Arleen Hodge; Dan M Spengler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic discography: what is the clinical utility?

Authors:  David A Provenzano
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

2.  Preferential superior surface motion in wear simulations of the Charité total disc replacement.

Authors:  Curtis M Goreham-Voss; Rachel Vicars; Richard M Hall; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Surgery for adult spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Florian Ringel; Markus Quante; Sven O Eicker; Cathleen Muche-Borowski; Ralph Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Virtually bloodless posterior midline exposure of the lumbar spine using the "para-midline" fatty plane.

Authors:  Michael H Moghimi; Dana A Leonard; Charles H Cho; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Philippe Phan; Mitchel B Harris; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Short-term effects of a dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys) for multi-segmental lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Jun Liu; Ying Shi; Yu Chen; Hailong Yu; Junxiong Ma; Weijian Ren; Huifeng Yang; Hongwei Wang; Liangbi Xiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Qingan Zhu; Eyal Itshayek; Claire F Jones; Timothy Schwab; Chadwick R Larson; Lawrence G Lenke; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Toshitada Miwa; Hironobu Sakaura; Tomoya Yamashita; Shozo Suzuki; Tetsuo Ohwada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Bai-Ling Chen; Fu-Xin Wei; Kazumasa Ueyama; Deng-Hui Xie; Akio Sannohe; Shao-Yu Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Risk for adjacent segment and same segment reoperation after surgery for lumbar stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Patrick Curry; Alan Hilibrand; Christopher Kepler; Jon Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Todd J Albert; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.