Literature DB >> 18600137

The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion.

Jun-Hong Min1, Jee-Soo Jang, Byung joo Jung, Ho Yeon Lee, Won-Chul Choi, Chan Shik Shim, Gun Choi, Sang-Ho Lee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical significance of, characteristics of, and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in patients who have undergone instrumented lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD has been considered a potential long-term complication of spinal arthrodesis. However, the exact mechanisms and risk factors related to ASD are not completely understood.
METHODS: A total of 48 patients who underwent instrumented lumbar fusion at L4-5 and had minimal ASD preoperatively were evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups at follow-up according to the development of ASD defined by radiologic criteria. Through review of their medical records and the radiologic files, the following variables were evaluated in the 2 groups: basic demographic data, body weight, body height, body mass index, bone mineral density, types of surgical approaches, preoperative and postoperative segmental and lumbar lordosis, and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: ASD was found in 30 (62.5%) patients. The variables that showed statistical intergroup differences were the mean age at surgery, the mean difference in the degree of preoperative from postoperative lumbar lordosis, and the proportion of patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion. However, there were no statistically significant intergroup differences in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score at 1-year postoperatively or at the final follow-up, or in the recovery rate, success rate, and complication rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic ASD is relatively common long-term finding associated with instrumented lumbar fusion. However, radiographic evidence of ASD does not necessarily correlate with a poor outcome. Our results suggest that advanced age, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and the restoration of the preoperative standing lumbar lordosis may have a protective effect against the development of ASD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18600137     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318142b960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  28 in total

1.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis : comparative study of two different types of cages.

Authors:  Chul-Bum Cho; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-05-31

Review 2.  Adjacent Segment Pathology after Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Sung-Woo Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

3.  Effect of body mass index on patient outcomes of surgical intervention for the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Michael Flippin; Jessica Harris; Elizabeth W Paxton; Heather A Prentice; Donald C Fithian; Samuel R Ward; Sara P Gombatto
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

4.  Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a risk factor for further surgery in short-segment lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Bungo Otsuki; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Hiroaki Kimura; Takayoshi Shimizu; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Dynamic instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Clinical and biomechanical analysis of success factors].

Authors:  Y P Charles; A Walter; S Schuller; J-P Steib
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment options.

Authors:  Rolf Kalff; Christian Ewald; Albrecht Waschke; Lars Gobisch; Christof Hopf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Outcomes of posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation of circumferential fusion: a cohort study.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Tague M Thorson; William J Mullin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Stefania Vaga; M Brayda-Bruno; F Perona; M Fornari; M T Raimondi; M Petruzzi; G Grava; F Costa; E G Caiani; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Adjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunpeng Ren; Yueming Song; Limin Liu; Youdi Xue
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-12

10.  Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch predisposes to adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Dominique A Rothenfluh; Daniel A Mueller; Esin Rothenfluh; Kan Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.