Literature DB >> 22523400

Ocular following in humans: spatial properties.

Christian Quaia1, Boris M Sheliga, Edmond J Fitzgibbon, Lance M Optican.   

Abstract

Ocular following responses (OFRs) are tracking eye movements elicited at ultrashort latency by the sudden movement of a textured pattern. Here we report the results of our study of their dependency on the spatial arrangement of the motion stimulus. Unlike previous studies that looked at the effect of stimulus size, we investigated the impact of stimulus location and how two distinct stimuli, presented together, collectively determine the OFR. We used as stimuli vertical gratings that moved in the horizontal direction and that were confined to either one or two 0.58° high strips, spanning the width of the screen. We found that the response to individual strips varied as a function of the location and spatial frequency (SF) of the stimulus. The response decreased as the stimulus eccentricity increased, but this relationship was more accentuated at high than at low spatial frequencies. We also found that when pairs of stimuli were presented, nearby stimuli interacted strongly, so that the response to the pair was barely larger than the response to a single strip in the pair. This suppressive effect faded away as the separation between the strips increased. The variation of the suppressive interaction with strip separation, paired with the dependency on eccentricity of the responses to single strips, caused the peak response for strip pairs to be achieved at a specific separation, which varied as a function of SF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22523400      PMCID: PMC3438696          DOI: 10.1167/12.4.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  53 in total

1.  Short-latency disparity vergence in humans.

Authors:  C Busettini; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement.

Authors:  J Xing; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Single-unit activity in cortical area MST associated with disparity-vergence eye movements: evidence for population coding.

Authors:  A Takemura; Y Inoue; K Kawano; C Quaia; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  J Xing; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Version and vergence eye movements in humans: open-loop dynamics determined by monocular rather than binocular image speed.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  James R Cavanaugh; Wyeth Bair; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reversed short-latency ocular following.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Parallel motion processing for the initiation of short-latency ocular following in humans.

Authors:  Guillaume S Masson; Eric Castet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  From 1D to 2D via 3D: dynamics of surface motion segmentation for ocular tracking in primates.

Authors:  Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun

Review 10.  The behavioral receptive field underlying motion integration for primate tracking eye movements.

Authors:  Guillaume S Masson; Laurent U Perrinet
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  11 in total

1.  Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Difference in perceptual and oculomotor responses revealed by apparent motion stimuli presented with an interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Shizuka Nohara; Kenji Kawano; Kenichiro Miura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): dependence upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; B G Cumming; E J Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Suppression and Contrast Normalization in Motion Processing.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binocular Summation for Reflexive Eye Movements: A Potential Diagnostic Tool for Stereodeficiencies.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  A behavioral receptive field for ocular following in monkeys: Spatial summation and its spatial frequency tuning.

Authors:  Frédéric V Barthélemy; Jérome Fleuriet; Laurent U Perrinet; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-27

8.  Tracking the Mind's Eye: Primate Gaze Behavior during Virtual Visuomotor Navigation Reflects Belief Dynamics.

Authors:  Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan; Eric Avila; Erin Neyhart; Gregory C DeAngelis; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  A Motion-from-Form Mechanism Contributes to Extracting Pattern Motion from Plaids.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Micro-pursuit: A class of fixational eye movements correlating with smooth, predictable, small-scale target trajectories.

Authors:  Kevin Parisot; Steeve Zozor; Anne Guérin-Dugué; Ronald Phlypo; Alan Chauvin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.