Literature DB >> 12450510

Version and vergence eye movements in humans: open-loop dynamics determined by monocular rather than binocular image speed.

G S Masson1, D-S Yang, F A Miles.   

Abstract

We examined the velocity dependence of the vergence and version eye movements elicited by motion stimuli that were symmetric or asymmetric at the two eyes. Movements of both eyes were recorded with the scleral search coil technique. Vergence was computed as the difference in the positions of the two eyes (left-right) and version was computed as the average position of the two eyes ((left+right)/2). Subjects faced a large tangent screen onto which two identical random-dot patterns were back-projected. Each pattern was viewed by one eye only using crossed-polarizers and its position was controlled by X/Y mirror galvanometers. Viewing was always binocular and horizontal velocity steps (range, 5-240 deg/s) were applied to one (asymmetric stimulus) or both (symmetric stimulus) patterns approximately 50 ms after a centering saccade. With the symmetric stimulus, the motion at the two eyes could be either in the opposite direction (eliciting vergence responses) or in the same direction (eliciting version responses). The asymmetric stimuli elicited both vergence and version. In all cases, minimum response latencies were very short (<90 ms). Velocity tuning curves (based on the changes in vergence and version over the time period, 90-140 ms) were all sigmoidal and peaked when the monocular (i.e., retinal) image velocities were 30-60 deg/s. The vergence (version) responses to symmetric stimuli were linearly related to the vergence (version) responses to asymmetric stimuli when expressed in terms of the monocular rather than the binocular image velocities. We conclude that the dynamical limits for both vergence and version are imposed in the monocular visual pathways, before the inputs from the two eyes are combined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12450510      PMCID: PMC2562760          DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00334-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  Short-latency disparity vergence in humans.

Authors:  C Busettini; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity.

Authors:  G S Masson; C Busettini; D S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Single-unit activity in cortical area MST associated with disparity-vergence eye movements: evidence for population coding.

Authors:  A Takemura; Y Inoue; K Kawano; C Quaia; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A specialization for relative disparity in V2.

Authors:  O M Thomas; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Visually driven eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency are severely impaired by MST lesions.

Authors:  Aya Takemura; Yuka Inoue; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Motion in depth based on inter-ocular velocity differences.

Authors:  S Shioiri; H Saisho; H Yaguchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Precise recording of human eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; F van der Mark; T C Jansen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Reversed short-latency ocular following.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Motor responses to conflicting asymmetrical vergence stimulus information.

Authors:  R Jones; K E Kerr
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1971-12

10.  Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  14 in total

1.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The initial ocular following responses elicited by apparent-motion stimuli: reversal by inter-stimulus intervals.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Short-latency disparity vergence in humans: evidence for early spatial filtering.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors.

Authors:  Y Kodaka; B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: dependence on the preëxisting vergence angle.

Authors:  H A Rambold; F A Miles
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  The initial disparity vergence elicited with single and dual grating stimuli in monkeys: evidence for disparity energy sensing and nonlinear interactions.

Authors:  K Miura; Y Sugita; K Matsuura; N Inaba; K Kawano; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Interocular velocity cues elicit vergence eye movements in mice.

Authors:  Veronica Choi; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Contrast sensitivity, first-order motion and Initial ocular following in demyelinating optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Janet C Rucker; Boris M Sheliga; Edmond J Fitzgibbon; Frederick A Miles; R John Leigh
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.