Literature DB >> 22520669

The Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a multicentre randomised trial of absolute cardiovascular risk reduction.

Tom Brett1, Diane Arnold-Reed, Cam Phan, Frances Cadden, William Walker, Wendy Manea-Walley, Noelene Mora, Julie Young, Max Bulsara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of global mortality. Risk factor management in clinical practice often relies on relative risk modification rather than the more appropriate absolute risk assessment. AIM: To determine whether patients receiving more-frequently designated GP visits had increased benefit in terms of their absolute CVD risk assessment, as compared with patients in receipt of their usual GP care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective, open, pragmatic block randomised study in a 1:1 group allocation ratio in three Western Australian general practices.
METHOD: A convenience sample (n = 1200) of patients aged 40-80 years were randomised to 3-monthly GP visits (five in total for the intensive) or usual GP care (two in total for the opportunistic), with 12 months' follow-up. The main outcome was absolute CVD risk scores based on the New Zealand Cardiovascular Risk Calculator. Others outcome measures were weight, height, waist circumference, blood pressure, and fasting blood lipids and glucose.
RESULTS: There were 600 patients per group at baseline. At 12 months' analysis there were 543 in the intensive group and 569 in the opportunistic group. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) absolute CVD risk reduced significantly between baseline and 12 months in the intensive group (6.28% [5.11] to 6.10% [4.94]) but not in the opportunistic group (6.27% [5.10] to 6.24% [5.38]). There was a significant reduction between baseline and 12 months in mean (SD) total cholesterol (5.28 mmol/l [0.94] to 5.08 mmol/l [0.96]); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.08 mmol/l [0.87] to 2.95 mmol/l [0.89]); triglyceride (1.45 mmol/l [0.86] to 1.36 mmol/l [0.84]); and in mean (SD) waist circumference in men (98.74 cm [10.70] to 97.13 cm [10.20]) and females (90.64 cm [14.62] to 88.96 cm [14.00]) in the intensive group.
CONCLUSION: A targeted approach using absolute risk calculators can be used in primary care to modify global CVD risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22520669      PMCID: PMC3252536          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X616337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  28 in total

1.  Risk assessment in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: randomised comparison of three scoring methods.

Authors:  C G Isles; L D Ritchie; P Murchie; J Norrie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

2.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Barry P McGrath
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Controlled trial of effect of documented cardiovascular risk scores on prescribing.

Authors:  L M L Hall; R T Jung; G P Leese
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-01

4.  Ten years of life: Is it a matter of choice?

Authors:  G E Fraser; D J Shavlik
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-09

5.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Estimation of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients in primary care.

Authors:  A A Montgomery; T Fahey; C MacKintosh; D J Sharp; T J Peters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians.

Authors:  Stacey Sheridan; Michael Pignone; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Evaluation of general practitioners' use of a smoking intervention programme.

Authors:  R Richmond; I Webster
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  10: Management of obesity.

Authors:  Joseph Proietto; Louise A Baur
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-05-03       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a multicentre randomised trial of absolute cardiovascular risk reduction.

Authors:  Benjamin Philpot; Kevin McNamara; James A Dunbar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Si; John R Moss; Thomas R Sullivan; Skye S Newton; Nigel P Stocks
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kunal N Karmali; Stephen D Persell; Pablo Perel; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-14

4.  General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.

Authors:  Lasse T Krogsbøll; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-31

Review 5.  Multiple health behaviour change interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samah Alageel; Martin C Gulliford; Lisa McDermott; Alison J Wright
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Detection and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care in Australia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster intervention study with pre-post intervention comparisons.

Authors:  Diane E Arnold-Reed; Tom Brett; Lakkhina Troeung; Alistair Vickery; Jacquie Garton-Smith; Damon Bell; Jing Pang; Tegan Grace; Caroline Bulsara; Ian Li; Max Bulsara; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the 45-49 year old health check versus usual care in Australian general practice: A modelling study.

Authors:  Si Si; John Moss; Jonathan Karnon; Nigel Stocks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Using clinical prediction models to personalise lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Anke Bruninx; Bart Scheenstra; Andre Dekker; Jos Maessen; Arnoud van 't Hof; Bas Kietselaer; Iñigo Bermejo
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-12-16

9.  NHS health checks through general practice: randomised trial of population cardiovascular risk reduction.

Authors:  Thomas Cochrane; Rachel Davey; Zafar Iqbal; Christopher Gidlow; Jagdish Kumar; Ruth Chambers; Yvonne Mawby
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Christopher C Butler; Sharon A Simpson; Kerenza Hood; David Cohen; Tim Pickles; Clio Spanou; Jim McCambridge; Laurence Moore; Elizabeth Randell; M Fasihul Alam; Paul Kinnersley; Adrian Edwards; Christine Smith; Stephen Rollnick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-03-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.