Literature DB >> 10710579

Risk assessment in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: randomised comparison of three scoring methods.

C G Isles1, L D Ritchie, P Murchie, J Norrie.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10710579      PMCID: PMC27313          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

1.  Management of UTI in general practice: a cost effective analysis. A commentary to facilitate an understanding of economic evaluation.

Authors:  D Kernick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Statins and the prevention of coronary heart disease: striking a balance that is desirable, affordable, and achievable.

Authors:  L D Ritchie
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The primary prevention of coronary heart disease with statins: practice headache or public health?

Authors:  P H Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Risk in cardiovascular disease. Merit of using risk reduction rather than absolute risk for lipid lowering drugs.

Authors:  R Neary; S Ramachandran
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-15

5.  Comparison of methods of estimating coronary risk. Authors did not use latest version of Sheffield table.

Authors:  E J Wallis; L E Ramsay; J I Yikona; P R Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-15

6.  Comparative evaluation of the new Sheffield table and the modified joint British societies coronary risk prediction chart against a laboratory based risk score calculation.

Authors:  K S Rabindranath; N R Anderson; R Gama; M R Holland
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice.

Authors:  R Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

Review 8.  Predicting melanoma risk: theory, practice and future challenges.

Authors:  David Whiteman
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

9.  Using disease risk estimates to guide risk factor interventions: field test of a patient workbook for self-assessing coronary risk.

Authors:  J Michael Paterson; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; C David Naylor
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians.

Authors:  Stacey Sheridan; Michael Pignone; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.