Literature DB >> 30699470

General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.

Lasse T Krogsbøll1, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Peter C Gøtzsche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General health checks are common elements of health care in some countries. They aim to detect disease and risk factors for disease with the purpose of reducing morbidity and mortality. Most of the commonly used individual screening tests offered in general health checks have been incompletely studied. Also, screening leads to increased use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, which can be harmful as well as beneficial. It is therefore important to assess whether general health checks do more good than harm. This is the first update of the review published in 2012.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases and two trials registers on 31 January 2018. Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed papers for eligibility and read reference lists. One review author used citation tracking (Web of Knowledge) and asked trial authors about additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adults unselected for disease or risk factors. We did not include geriatric trials. We defined health checks as screening for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. We contacted trial authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary. When possible, we analysed the results with a random-effects model meta-analysis; otherwise, we did a narrative synthesis. MAIN
RESULTS: We included 17 trials, 15 of which reported outcome data (251,891 participants). Risk of bias was generally low for our primary outcomes. Health checks have little or no effect on total mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.03; 11 trials; 233,298 participants and 21,535 deaths; high-certainty evidence, I2 = 0%), or cancer mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.12; 8 trials; 139,290 participants and 3663 deaths; high-certainty evidence, I2 = 33%), and probably have little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.16; 9 trials; 170,227 participants and 6237 deaths; moderate-certainty evidence; I2 = 65%). Health checks have little or no effect on fatal and non-fatal ischaemic heart disease (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.03; 4 trials; 164,881 persons, 10,325 events; high-certainty evidence; I2 = 11%), and probably have little or no effect on fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 1.05 95% CI 0.95 to 1.17; 3 trials; 107,421 persons, 4543 events; moderate-certainty evidence, I2 = 53%). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: General health checks are unlikely to be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30699470      PMCID: PMC6353639          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  168 in total

1.  WHO European Collaborative Trial in the multifactorial prevention of coronary heart disease. World Health Organization European Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1990

2.  A retrospective evaluation of the NHS Health Check Programme in a multi-ethnic population.

Authors:  P Carter; D H Bodicoat; M J Davies; N B Ashra; D Riley; N Joshi; A Farooqi; I Browne; K Khunti
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 3.  Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Carolyn D Summerbell; Rachel Thompson; Deirdre Sills; Felicia G Roberts; Helen J Moore; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

4.  ACP Journal Club. Review: primary care-based general health checks improve surrogate but not clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Chris Del Mar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  A program to measure the impact of multiphasic health testing on health differentials between poverty and nonpoverty groups.

Authors:  S Shapiro; R Fink; C Rosenberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1972 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks.

Authors:  B Karlsmose; T Lauritzen; M Engberg; A Parving
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs. An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP).

Authors:  Torsten Lauritzen; Morten Sig Ager Jensen; Janus Laust Thomsen; Bo Christensen; Marianne Engberg
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 8.  Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Nicole Martin; Asmaa Abdelhamid; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-10

9.  What determines mortality risk in male former cigarette smokers?

Authors:  Y Ben-Shlomo; G D Smith; M J Shipley; M G Marmot
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The NHS Health Check in England: an evaluation of the first 4 years.

Authors:  John Robson; Isabel Dostal; Aziz Sheikh; Sandra Eldridge; Vichithranie Madurasinghe; Chris Griffiths; Carol Coupland; Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  33 in total

1.  [Evidence-based recommendations for the revision of the Austrian periodic health examination].

Authors:  Isolde Sommer; Viktoria Titscher; Birgit Teufer; Irma Klerings; Barbara Nußbaumer-Streit; Monika Szelag; Lisa Affengruber; Gernot Wagner; Anna Glechner; Christina Kien; Agnes Ebenberger; Irmgard Schiller-Frühwirth; Thomas E Dorner; Andrea Siebenhofer; Bernd Haditsch; Herbert Bachler; Uwe Siebert; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2019-06-11

2.  Is the NHS 'Heart Age Test' too much medicine?

Authors:  Carissa Bonner; Shannon McKinn; Kirsten McCaffrey; Paul Glasziou; Les Irwig; Jenny Doust; Jesse Jansen; Katy Bell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Digital Health: Should We Be Concerned?

Authors:  John Mandrola
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

4.  A dilemma.

Authors:  Tim Senior
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities.

Authors:  Lorcan Clarke; Michael Anderson; Rob Anderson; Morten Bonde Klausen; Rebecca Forman; Jenna Kerns; Adrian Rabe; Søren Rud Kristensen; Pavlos Theodorakis; Jose Valderas; Hans Kluge; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Effectiveness of an Out-of-Pocket Cost Removal Intervention on Health Check Attendance in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroshi Murayama; Yuta Takahashi; Setaro Shimada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The feasibility and outcome of a community-based primary prevention program for cardiovascular disease in the 21st century.

Authors:  Susanna M Kuneinen; Johan G Eriksson; Hannu Kautiainen; Mikael O Ekblad; Päivi E Korhonen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Expectations about check-up examinations among Swiss residents: A nationwide population-based cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Laura Diaz Hernandez; Stéphanie Giezendanner; Roland Fischer; Andreas Zeller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What is a prevention visit? A qualitative study of a structured approach to prevention and screening - the BETTER WISE project.

Authors:  N Sopcak; C Fernandes; M A O'Brien; D Ofosu; M Wong; T Wong; M Kebbe; D Manca
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.