BACKGROUND: A recent review concluded that general health checks fail to reduce mortality in adults. AIM: This review focuses on general practice-based health checks and their effects on both surrogate and final outcomes. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHOD: Relevant data were extracted from randomised trials comparing the health outcomes of general practice-based health checks versus usual care in middle-aged populations. RESULTS: Six trials were included. The end-point differences between the intervention and control arms in total cholesterol (TC), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and body mass index (BMI) were -0.13 mmol/l (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.19 to -0.07), -3.65 mmHg (95% CI = -6.50 to -0.81), -1.79 mmHg (95% CI = -2.93 to -0.64), and -0.45 kg/m(2) (95% CI = -0.66 to -0.24), respectively. The odds of a patient remaining at 'high risk' with elevated TC, SBP, DBP, BMI or continuing smoking were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.50 to 0.79), 0.59 (95% CI = 0.28 to 1.23), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.74), 0.89 (95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98), and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.02), respectively. There was little evidence of a difference in total mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.18). Higher CVD mortality was observed in the intervention group (OR 1.30, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.66). CONCLUSION: General practice-based health checks are associated with statistically significant, albeit clinically small, improvements in surrogate outcome control, especially among high-risk patients. Most studies were not originally designed to assess mortality.
BACKGROUND: A recent review concluded that general health checks fail to reduce mortality in adults. AIM: This review focuses on general practice-based health checks and their effects on both surrogate and final outcomes. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHOD: Relevant data were extracted from randomised trials comparing the health outcomes of general practice-based health checks versus usual care in middle-aged populations. RESULTS: Six trials were included. The end-point differences between the intervention and control arms in total cholesterol (TC), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and body mass index (BMI) were -0.13 mmol/l (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.19 to -0.07), -3.65 mmHg (95% CI = -6.50 to -0.81), -1.79 mmHg (95% CI = -2.93 to -0.64), and -0.45 kg/m(2) (95% CI = -0.66 to -0.24), respectively. The odds of a patient remaining at 'high risk' with elevated TC, SBP, DBP, BMI or continuing smoking were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.50 to 0.79), 0.59 (95% CI = 0.28 to 1.23), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.74), 0.89 (95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98), and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.02), respectively. There was little evidence of a difference in total mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.18). Higher CVD mortality was observed in the intervention group (OR 1.30, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.66). CONCLUSION: General practice-based health checks are associated with statistically significant, albeit clinically small, improvements in surrogate outcome control, especially among high-risk patients. Most studies were not originally designed to assess mortality.
Entities:
Keywords:
general practice; health check; mortality; primary health care; risk factors; systematic review
Authors: B M Psaty; N S Weiss; C D Furberg; T D Koepsell; D S Siscovick; F R Rosendaal; N L Smith; S R Heckbert; R C Kaplan; D Lin; T R Fleming; E H Wagner Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-08-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R K Simmons; M Rahman; R W Jakes; M F Yuyun; A R Niggebrugge; S H Hennings; D R R Williams; N J Wareham; S J Griffin Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: D A Wood; K Kotseva; S Connolly; C Jennings; A Mead; J Jones; A Holden; D De Bacquer; T Collier; G De Backer; O Faergeman Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-06-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Spyridon Marinopoulos; Karran A Phillips; Constance W Hwang; Kenric Maynor; Dan Merenstein; Renee F Wilson; George J Barnes; Eric B Bass; Neil R Powe; Gail L Daumit Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Simon Stewart; Melinda J Carrington; Carla H Swemmer; Craig Anderson; Nicol P Kurstjens; John Amerena; Alex Brown; Louise M Burrell; Ferdinandus J de Looze; Mark Harris; Joseph Hung; Henry Krum; Mark Nelson; Markus Schlaich; Nigel P Stocks; Garry L Jennings Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-11-20
Authors: J S Benner; L Erhardt; M Flammer; R A Moller; N Rajicic; K Changela; C Yunis; S B Cherry; Z Gaciong; E S Johnson; M C J M Sturkenboom; J García-Puig; X Girerd Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2008-08-07 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Isolde Sommer; Viktoria Titscher; Birgit Teufer; Irma Klerings; Barbara Nußbaumer-Streit; Monika Szelag; Lisa Affengruber; Gernot Wagner; Anna Glechner; Christina Kien; Agnes Ebenberger; Irmgard Schiller-Frühwirth; Thomas E Dorner; Andrea Siebenhofer; Bernd Haditsch; Herbert Bachler; Uwe Siebert; Gerald Gartlehner Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2019-06-11
Authors: Corine den Engelsen; Paula S Koekkoek; Merijn B Godefrooij; Mark G Spigt; Guy E Rutten Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: James A Dickinson; Guylène Thériault; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Roland Grad Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Richard Birtwhistle; Neil R Bell; Brett D Thombs; Roland Grad; James A Dickinson Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Richard Birtwhistle; Neil R Bell; Brett D Thombs; Roland Grad; James A Dickinson Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Christina Korownyk; James McCormack; Michael R Kolber; Scott Garrison; G Michael Allan Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Christina Korownyk; James McCormack; Michael R Kolber; Scott Garrison; G Michael Allan Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Massimo F Piepoli; Arno W Hoes; Stefan Agewall; Christian Albus; Carlos Brotons; Alberico L Catapano; Marie-Therese Cooney; Ugo Corrà; Bernard Cosyns; Christi Deaton; Ian Graham; Michael Stephen Hall; F D Richard Hobbs; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Herbert Löllgen; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Joep Perk; Eva Prescott; Josep Redon; Dimitrios J Richter; Naveed Sattar; Yvo Smulders; Monica Tiberi; H Bart van der Worp; Ineke van Dis; W M Monique Verschuren; Simone Binno Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 29.983