PURPOSE: Time and spectrally resolved measurements of autofluorescence have the potential to monitor metabolism at the cellular level. Fluorophores that emit with the same fluorescence intensity can be discriminated from each other by decay time of fluorescence intensity after pulsed excitation. We performed time-resolved autofluorescence measurements on fundus samples from a donor with significant extramacular drusen. METHODS: Tissue sections from two human donors were prepared and imaged with a laser scanning microscope. The sample was excited with a titanium-sapphire laser, which was tuned to 860 nm, and frequency doubled by a BBO crystal to 430 nm. The repetition rate was 76 MHz and the pulse width was 170 femtoseconds (fs). The time-resolved autofluorescence was recorded simultaneously in 16 spectral channels (445-605 nm) and bi-exponentially fitted. RESULTS: RPE can be discriminated clearly from Bruch's membrane, drusen, and choroidal connective tissue by fluorescence lifetime. In RPE, bright fluorescence of lipofuscin could be detected with a maximum at 510 nm and extending beyond 600 nm. The lifetime was 385 ps. Different types of drusen were found. Most of them did not contain lipofuscin and exhibited a weak fluorescence, with a maximum at 470 nm. The lifetime was 1785 picoseconds (ps). Also, brightly emitting lesions, presumably representing basal laminar deposits, with fluorescence lifetimes longer than those recorded in RPE could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstrated differentiation of fluorescent structures by their fluorescence decay time is important for interpretation of in vivo measurements by the new fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) ophthalmoscopy on healthy subjects as well as on patients.
PURPOSE: Time and spectrally resolved measurements of autofluorescence have the potential to monitor metabolism at the cellular level. Fluorophores that emit with the same fluorescence intensity can be discriminated from each other by decay time of fluorescence intensity after pulsed excitation. We performed time-resolved autofluorescence measurements on fundus samples from a donor with significant extramacular drusen. METHODS: Tissue sections from two human donors were prepared and imaged with a laser scanning microscope. The sample was excited with a titanium-sapphire laser, which was tuned to 860 nm, and frequency doubled by a BBO crystal to 430 nm. The repetition rate was 76 MHz and the pulse width was 170 femtoseconds (fs). The time-resolved autofluorescence was recorded simultaneously in 16 spectral channels (445-605 nm) and bi-exponentially fitted. RESULTS:RPE can be discriminated clearly from Bruch's membrane, drusen, and choroidal connective tissue by fluorescence lifetime. In RPE, bright fluorescence of lipofuscin could be detected with a maximum at 510 nm and extending beyond 600 nm. The lifetime was 385 ps. Different types of drusen were found. Most of them did not contain lipofuscin and exhibited a weak fluorescence, with a maximum at 470 nm. The lifetime was 1785 picoseconds (ps). Also, brightly emitting lesions, presumably representing basal laminar deposits, with fluorescence lifetimes longer than those recorded in RPE could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstrated differentiation of fluorescent structures by their fluorescence decay time is important for interpretation of in vivo measurements by the new fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) ophthalmoscopy on healthy subjects as well as on patients.
Authors: Christoph Biskup; Laimonas Kelbauskas; Thomas Zimmer; Klaus Benndorf; Axel Bergmann; Wolfgang Becker; J Peter Ruppersberg; Clemens Stockklausner; Nikolaj Klöcker Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: D Schweitzer; S Schenke; M Hammer; F Schweitzer; S Jentsch; E Birckner; W Becker; A Bergmann Journal: Microsc Res Tech Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.769
Authors: D Schweitzer; S Quick; S Schenke; M Klemm; S Gehlert; M Hammer; S Jentsch; J Fischer Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Dietrich Schweitzer; Martin Hammer; Frank Schweitzer; Roswitha Anders; Torsten Doebbecke; Stefan Schenke; E R Gaillard; E R Gaillard Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Alan D Marmorstein; Lihua Y Marmorstein; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Joe G Hollyfield Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Katarzyna Komar; Patrycjusz Stremplewski; Marta Motoczyńska; Maciej Szkulmowski; Maciej Wojtkowski Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: M A Yakovleva; T B Feldman; P M Arbukhanova; S A Borzenok; V A Kuzmin; M A Ostrovsky Journal: Dokl Biochem Biophys Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 0.788
Authors: M A Yakovleva; T B Feldman; P M Arbukhanova; S A Borzenok; V A Kuzmin; M A Ostrovsky Journal: Dokl Biochem Biophys Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 0.788
Authors: Tatiana B Feldman; Marina A Yakovleva; Andrey V Larichev; Patimat M Arbukhanova; Alexandra Sh Radchenko; Sergey A Borzenok; Vladimir A Kuzmin; Mikhail A Ostrovsky Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Ryan M Rich; Mark Mummert; Zygmunt Gryczynski; Julian Borejdo; Thomas Just Sørensen; Bo W Laursen; Zeno Foldes-Papp; Ignacy Gryczynski; Rafal Fudala Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Grazyna Palczewska; Marcin Golczak; David R Williams; Jennifer J Hunter; Krzysztof Palczewski Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 4.799