Literature DB >> 22508954

To CD or not to CD: Is there a 3D motion aftereffect based on changing disparities?

Thaddeus B Czuba1, Bas Rokers, Alexander C Huk, Lawrence K Cormack.   

Abstract

Recently, T. B. Czuba, B. Rokers, K. Guillet, A. C. Huk, and L. K. Cormack, (2011) and Y. Sakano, R. S. Allison, and I. P. Howard (2012) published very similar studies using the motion aftereffect to probe the way in which motion through depth is computed. Here, we compare and contrast the findings of these two studies and incorporate their results with a brief follow-up experiment. Taken together, the results leave no doubt that the human visual system incorporates a mechanism that is uniquely sensitive to the difference in velocity signals between the two eyes, but--perhaps surprisingly--evidence for a neural representation of changes in binocular disparity over time remains elusive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508954      PMCID: PMC3484882          DOI: 10.1167/12.4.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  9 in total

1.  Motion aftereffect in depth based on binocular information.

Authors:  Yuichi Sakano; Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatial scale of stereomotion speed processing.

Authors:  Kevin R Brooks; Leland S Stone
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Integration of monocular motion signals and the analysis of interocular velocity differences for the perception of motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Satoshi Shioiri; Daisuke Kakehi; Tomoyoshi Tashiro; Hirohisa Yaguchi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Differences in temporal frequency tuning between the two binocular mechanisms for seeing motion in depth.

Authors:  Satoshi Shioiri; Tomohiko Nakajima; Daisuke Kakehi; Hirohisa Yaguchi
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Three-dimensional motion aftereffects reveal distinct direction-selective mechanisms for binocular processing of motion through depth.

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Kyle Guillet; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Interocular velocity difference contributes to stereomotion speed perception.

Authors:  Kevin R Brooks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes.

Authors:  A M Norcia; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Two independent mechanisms for motion-in-depth perception: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Louise O'Hare; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-12
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Neural representation of motion-in-depth in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Separate Perceptual and Neural Processing of Velocity- and Disparity-Based 3D Motion Signals.

Authors:  Sung Jun Joo; Thaddeus B Czuba; Lawrence K Cormack; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.

Authors:  Lowell Thompson; Mohan Ji; Bas Rokers; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Binocular Mechanisms of 3D Motion Processing.

Authors:  Lawrence K Cormack; Thaddeus B Czuba; Jonas Knöll; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.422

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.