Literature DB >> 17209733

Spatial scale of stereomotion speed processing.

Kevin R Brooks1, Leland S Stone.   

Abstract

To examine the spatial scale of the mechanisms supporting the perception of motion in depth defined by binocular cues, we measured stereomotion speed discrimination thresholds as a function of stimulus size using a two-interval speed comparison task. Stimuli were either random dot stereogram (RDS) bars featuring both the changing disparity (CD) and the interocular velocity difference (IOVD) cues to motion in depth or dynamic random dot stereogram (DRDS) bars featuring the CD cue alone. Monocular speed discrimination performance was also assessed, using half-images of the RDS stimulus. In addition, subjects' stereoacuity for stationary versions of the binocular stimuli was measured. Stimuli ranged in vertical extent from 1.25 to 40 min. Sensitivity to speed differences was strongly related to stimulus height for DRDS stimuli. Performance decreased rapidly as stimulus size was reduced, becoming nearly random for heights below 5 min. However, for RDS stimuli, speed discrimination performance declined with reductions in stimulus size at a far slower rate, providing superior performance at every stimulus size used. Monocular performance was superior still for the majority of subjects, yet showed a similar rate of decline to binocular RDS stimuli. We conclude that the spatial resolution of the CD mechanism and its static disparity inputs is, on average, nearly nine times more coarse than the IOVD system and its monocular motion inputs. Static stereoacuity controls show that this finding cannot be explained by differences in the disparity signals available in our RDS and DRDS stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209733     DOI: 10.1167/6.11.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  3 in total

1.  To CD or not to CD: Is there a 3D motion aftereffect based on changing disparities?

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Synchronized audio-visual transients drive efficient visual search for motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Marina Zannoli; John Cass; Pascal Mamassian; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Investigating Human Visual Sensitivity to Binocular Motion-in-Depth for Anti- and De-Correlated Random-Dot Stimuli.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Alex R Wade; Marina Bloj; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.