Literature DB >> 12678584

Interocular velocity difference contributes to stereomotion speed perception.

Kevin R Brooks1.   

Abstract

Two experiments are presented assessing the contributions of the rate of change of disparity (CD) and interocular velocity difference (IOVD) cues to stereomotion speed perception. Using a two-interval forced-choice paradigm, the perceived speed of directly approaching and receding stereomotion and of monocular lateral motion in random dot stereogram (RDS) targets was measured. Prior adaptation using dysjunctively moving random dot stimuli induced a velocity aftereffect (VAE). The degree of interocular correlation in the adapting images was manipulated to assess the effectiveness of each cue. While correlated adaptation involved a conventional RDS stimulus, containing both IOVD and CD cues, uncorrelated adaptation featured an independent dot array in each monocular half-image, and hence lacked a coherent disparity signal. Adaptation produced a larger VAE for stereomotion than for monocular lateral motion, implying effects at neural sites beyond that of binocular combination. For motion passing through the horopter, correlated and uncorrelated adaptation stimuli produced equivalent stereomotion VAEs. The possibility that these results were due to the adaptation of a CD mechanism through random matches in the uncorrelated stimulus was discounted in a control experiment. Here both simultaneous and sequential adaptation of left and right eyes produced similar stereomotion VAEs. Motion at uncrossed disparities was also affected by both correlated and uncorrelated adaptation stimuli, but showed a significantly greater VAE in response to the former. These results show that (1) there are two separate, specialised mechanisms for encoding stereomotion: one through IOVD, the other through CD; (2) the IOVD cue dominates the perception of stereomotion speed for stimuli passing through the horopter; and (3) at a disparity pedestal both the IOVD and the CD cues have a significant influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12678584     DOI: 10.1167/2.3.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  22 in total

1.  To CD or not to CD: Is there a 3D motion aftereffect based on changing disparities?

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Seeing motion in depth using inter-ocular velocity differences.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Disparity- and velocity-based signals for three-dimensional motion perception in human MT+.

Authors:  Bas Rokers; Lawrence K Cormack; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Neural representation of motion-in-depth in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Separate Perceptual and Neural Processing of Velocity- and Disparity-Based 3D Motion Signals.

Authors:  Sung Jun Joo; Thaddeus B Czuba; Lawrence K Cormack; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.

Authors:  Lowell Thompson; Mohan Ji; Bas Rokers; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  Multiplexing in the primate motion pathway.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Three-dimensional motion aftereffects reveal distinct direction-selective mechanisms for binocular processing of motion through depth.

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Kyle Guillet; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  On the inverse problem of binocular 3D motion perception.

Authors:  Martin Lages; Suzanne Heron
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.