Literature DB >> 18594613

Differences in temporal frequency tuning between the two binocular mechanisms for seeing motion in depth.

Satoshi Shioiri1, Tomohiko Nakajima, Daisuke Kakehi, Hirohisa Yaguchi.   

Abstract

There are two types of binocular cues available for perception of motion in depth. One is the binocular disparity change in time and the other is the velocity difference between the left and the right retinal images (inter-ocular velocity differences). We measured the luminance contrast threshold for seeing motion in depth while isolating either of the cues at various temporal modulations of velocity in the stimulus. To isolate disparity cues, dynamic random-dot stereograms were used (the disparity condition) while binocularly uncorrelated random-dot kinematograms were used to isolate velocity cues (the velocity condition). Results showed that sensitivity peaked at a temporal frequency (approximately 1 cps) in the velocity condition while the peak in the disparity condition was at the lowest frequency (0.35 cps) or at least at a frequency lower than that in the velocity condition. This suggests that the visual system has different temporal frequency properties for the velocity and disparity cues for motion in depth.

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594613     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.25.001574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  8 in total

1.  To CD or not to CD: Is there a 3D motion aftereffect based on changing disparities?

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Multiplexing in the primate motion pathway.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Image statistics determine the integration of visual cues to motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Ross Goutcher; Lauren Murray; Brooke Benz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Two independent mechanisms for motion-in-depth perception: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Louise O'Hare; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-12

5.  Asymmetries between achromatic and chromatic extraction of 3D motion signals.

Authors:  Milena Kaestner; Ryan T Maloney; Kirstie H Wailes-Newson; Marina Bloj; Julie M Harris; Antony B Morland; Alex R Wade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Investigating Human Visual Sensitivity to Binocular Motion-in-Depth for Anti- and De-Correlated Random-Dot Stimuli.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Alex R Wade; Marina Bloj; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-01

7.  Decoding Neural Responses to Motion-in-Depth Using EEG.

Authors:  Marc M Himmelberg; Federico G Segala; Ryan T Maloney; Julie M Harris; Alex R Wade
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Cue-dependent effects of VR experience on motion-in-depth sensitivity.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Fulvio; Mohan Ji; Lowell Thompson; Ari Rosenberg; Bas Rokers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.