Literature DB >> 22508731

The cost-effectiveness of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in the United States in men who have sex with men.

Jessie L Juusola1, Margaret L Brandeau, Douglas K Owens, Eran Bendavid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent randomized, controlled trial showed that daily oral preexposure chemoprophylaxis (PrEP) was effective for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men (MSM). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently provided interim guidance for PrEP in MSM at high risk for HIV. Previous studies did not reach a consistent estimate of its cost-effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PrEP in MSM in the United States.
DESIGN: Dynamic model of HIV transmission and progression combined with a detailed economic analysis. DATA SOURCES: Published literature. TARGET POPULATION: MSM aged 13 to 64 years in the United States. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. INTERVENTION: PrEP was evaluated in both the general MSM population and in high-risk MSM and was assumed to reduce infection risk by 44% on the basis of clinical trial results. OUTCOME MEASURES: New HIV infections, discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Initiating PrEP in 20% of MSM in the United States would reduce new HIV infections by an estimated 13% and result in a gain of 550,166 QALYs over 20 years at a cost of $172,091 per QALY gained. Initiating PrEP in a larger proportion of MSM would prevent more infections but at an increasing cost per QALY gained (up to $216,480 if all MSM receive PrEP). Preexposure chemoprophylaxis in only high-risk MSM can improve cost-effectiveness. For MSM with an average of 5 partners per year, PrEP costs approximately $50,000 per QALY gained. Providing PrEP to all high-risk MSM for 20 years would cost $75 billion more in health care-related costs than the status quo and $600,000 per HIV infection prevented, compared with incremental costs of $95 billion and $2 million per infection prevented for 20% coverage of all MSM. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: PrEP in the general MSM population would cost less than $100,000 per QALY gained if the daily cost of antiretroviral drugs for PrEP was less than $15 or if PrEP efficacy was greater than 75%. LIMITATION: When examining PrEP in high-risk MSM, the investigators did not model a mix of low- and high-risk MSM because of lack of data on mixing patterns.
CONCLUSION: PrEP in the general MSM population could prevent a substantial number of HIV infections, but it is expensive. Use in high-risk MSM compares favorably with other interventions that are considered cost-effective but could result in annual PrEP expenditures of more than $4 billion. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Drug Abuse, Department of Veterans Affairs, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508731      PMCID: PMC3690921          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  80 in total

1.  Interim guidance: preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in men who have sex with men.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Preference-Based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Vahram Ghushchyan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Quality-of-life weights for the US population: self-reported health status and priority health conditions, by demographic characteristics.

Authors:  John A Nyman; Nathan A Barleen; Bryan E Dowd; Daniel W Russell; Stephen Joel Coons; Patrick W Sullivan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  How many sexually-acquired HIV infections in the USA are due to acute-phase HIV transmission?

Authors:  Steven D Pinkerton
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Updates of cost of illness and quality of life estimates for use in economic evaluations of HIV prevention programs.

Authors:  D R Holtgrave; S D Pinkerton
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol       Date:  1997-09-01

6.  Rates of HIV-1 transmission per coital act, by stage of HIV-1 infection, in Rakai, Uganda.

Authors:  Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray; Nelson K Sewankambo; David Serwadda; Xianbin Li; Oliver Laeyendecker; Noah Kiwanuka; Godfrey Kigozi; Mohammed Kiddugavu; Thomas Lutalo; Fred Nalugoda; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Mary P Meehan; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Costs of HIV medical care in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  K A Gebo; R E Chaisson; J G Folkemer; J G Bartlett; R D Moore
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 8.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis state of the science: empirical analogies for research and implementation.

Authors:  Sarit A Golub; Don Operario; Pamina M Gorbach
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Project RESPECT Study Group.

Authors:  M L Kamb; M Fishbein; J M Douglas; F Rhodes; J Rogers; G Bolan; J Zenilman; T Hoxworth; C K Malotte; M Iatesta; C Kent; A Lentz; S Graziano; R H Byers; T A Peterman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The NIMH Multisite HIV Prevention Trial: reducing HIV sexual risk behavior. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Multisite HIV Prevention Trial Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  118 in total

1.  HIV-Negative Partnered Men's Willingness to Use Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Associated Factors Among an Internet Sample of U.S. HIV-Negative and HIV-Discordant Male Couples.

Authors:  Jason W Mitchell; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.151

2.  Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis among Black and White men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Georgia.

Authors:  Charlotte-Paige Rolle; Eli S Rosenberg; Nicole Luisi; Jeremy Grey; Travis Sanchez; Carlos Del Rio; John L Peterson; Paula M Frew; Patrick S Sullivan; Colleen F Kelley
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.359

Review 3.  Evolving Models and Ongoing Challenges for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation in the United States.

Authors:  Kenneth H Mayer; Philip A Chan; Rupa R Patel; Charlene A Flash; Douglas S Krakower
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Simulating the End of AIDS in New York: Using Participatory Dynamic Modeling to Improve Implementation of the Ending the Epidemic Initiative.

Authors:  Erika G Martin; Roderick H MacDonald; Daniel E Gordon; Carol-Ann Swain; Travis O'Donnell; John Helmeset; Adenantera Dwicaksono; James M Tesoriero
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 5.  Engaging healthcare providers to implement HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Authors:  Douglas Krakower; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.283

6.  High risk for HIV following syphilis diagnosis among men in Florida, 2000-2011.

Authors:  Thomas A Peterman; Daniel R Newman; Lorene Maddox; Karla Schmitt; Stacy Shiver
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Evaluating the impact of prioritization of antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis in New York.

Authors:  Jason Kessler; Julie E Myers; Kimberly A Nucifora; Nana Mensah; Christopher Toohey; Amin Khademi; Blayne Cutler; Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 8.  Use of antiretrovirals for HIV prevention: what do we know and what don't we know?

Authors:  Jared M Baeten; Robert Grant
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  Preexposure prophylaxis for adolescents and young adults at risk for HIV infection: is an ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure?

Authors:  Jill E Pace; George K Siberry; Rohan Hazra; Bill G Kapogiannis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Plasma Tenofovir Levels to Support Adherence to TDF/FTC Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in MSM in Los Angeles, California.

Authors:  Raphael J Landovitz; Matthew Beymer; Ryan Kofron; Kathy Rivet Amico; Christina Psaros; Lane Bushman; Peter L Anderson; Risa Flynn; David P Lee; Robert K Bolan; Wilbert C Jordan; Chi-Hong Tseng; Rhodri Dierst-Davies; Jim Rooney; Amy Rock Wohl
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.