Erika G Martin1,2, Roderick H MacDonald3, Daniel E Gordon4, Carol-Ann Swain4, Travis O'Donnell4, John Helmeset4, Adenantera Dwicaksono1,5, James M Tesoriero2,4. 1. 1084 Department of Public Administration and Policy, University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA. 2. Center for Collaborative HIV Research in Practice and Policy, Albany, NY, USA. 3. 3745 School of Integrated Science, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA. 4. 1094 AIDS Institute, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA. 5. School of Architecture, Planning, and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In 2014, the governor of New York announced the Ending the Epidemic (ETE) plan to reduce annual new HIV infections from 3000 to 750, achieve a first-ever decrease in HIV prevalence, and reduce AIDS progression by the end of 2020. The state health department undertook participatory simulation modeling to develop a baseline for comparing epidemic trends and feedback on ETE strategies. METHODS: A dynamic compartmental model projected the individual and combined effects of 3 ETE initiatives: enhanced linkage to and retention in HIV treatment, increased preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men, and expanded housing assistance. Data inputs for model calibration and low-, medium-, and high-implementation scenarios (stakeholders' rollout predictions, and lower and upper bounds) came from surveillance and program data through 2014, the literature, and expert judgment. RESULTS: Without ETE (baseline scenario), new HIV infections would decline but remain >750, and HIV prevalence would continue to increase by 2020. Concurrently implementing the 3 programs would lower annual new HIV infections by 16.0%, 28.1%, and 45.7% compared with baseline in the low-, medium-, and high-implementation scenarios, respectively. In all concurrent implementation scenarios, although annual new HIV infections would remain >750, there would be fewer new HIV infections than deaths, yielding the first-ever decrease in HIV prevalence. PrEP and enhanced linkage and retention would confer the largest population-level changes. CONCLUSIONS: New York State will achieve 1 ETE benchmark under the most realistic (medium) implementation scenario. Findings facilitated framing of ETE goals and underscored the need to prioritize men who have sex with men and maintain ETE's multipronged approach, including other programs not modeled here.
OBJECTIVES: In 2014, the governor of New York announced the Ending the Epidemic (ETE) plan to reduce annual new HIV infections from 3000 to 750, achieve a first-ever decrease in HIV prevalence, and reduce AIDS progression by the end of 2020. The state health department undertook participatory simulation modeling to develop a baseline for comparing epidemic trends and feedback on ETE strategies. METHODS: A dynamic compartmental model projected the individual and combined effects of 3 ETE initiatives: enhanced linkage to and retention in HIV treatment, increased preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men, and expanded housing assistance. Data inputs for model calibration and low-, medium-, and high-implementation scenarios (stakeholders' rollout predictions, and lower and upper bounds) came from surveillance and program data through 2014, the literature, and expert judgment. RESULTS: Without ETE (baseline scenario), new HIV infections would decline but remain >750, and HIV prevalence would continue to increase by 2020. Concurrently implementing the 3 programs would lower annual new HIV infections by 16.0%, 28.1%, and 45.7% compared with baseline in the low-, medium-, and high-implementation scenarios, respectively. In all concurrent implementation scenarios, although annual new HIV infections would remain >750, there would be fewer new HIV infections than deaths, yielding the first-ever decrease in HIV prevalence. PrEP and enhanced linkage and retention would confer the largest population-level changes. CONCLUSIONS: New York State will achieve 1 ETE benchmark under the most realistic (medium) implementation scenario. Findings facilitated framing of ETE goals and underscored the need to prioritize men who have sex with men and maintain ETE's multipronged approach, including other programs not modeled here.
Entities:
Keywords:
HIV; computer simulation; health policy; preexposure prophylaxis
Authors: Robert M Grant; Peter L Anderson; Vanessa McMahan; Albert Liu; K Rivet Amico; Megha Mehrotra; Sybil Hosek; Carlos Mosquera; Martin Casapia; Orlando Montoya; Susan Buchbinder; Valdilea G Veloso; Kenneth Mayer; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Linda-Gail Bekker; Esper G Kallas; Mauro Schechter; Juan Guanira; Lane Bushman; David N Burns; James F Rooney; David V Glidden Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Evin Uzun Jacobson; Katherine A Hicks; Emily L Tucker; Paul G Farnham; Stephanie L Sansom Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2018 Jul/Aug
Authors: Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Aloysious Kakia; Josephine Odoyo; Akasiima Mucunguzi; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Rogers Twesigye; Kenneth Ngure; Cosmas Apaka; Harrison Tamooh; Fridah Gabona; Andrew Mujugira; Dana Panteleeff; Katherine K Thomas; Lara Kidoguchi; Meighan Krows; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Harald Haugen; Mira Emmanuel-Ogier; Lisa Ondrejcek; Robert W Coombs; Lisa Frenkel; Craig Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; David Bangsberg; Jessica E Haberer; Wendy S Stevens; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lisa A Grohskopf; Kata L Chillag; Roman Gvetadze; Albert Y Liu; Melanie Thompson; Kenneth H Mayer; Brandi M Collins; Sonal R Pathak; Brandon Oʼhara; Marta L Ackers; Charles E Rose; Robert M Grant; Lynn A Paxton; Susan P Buchbinder Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Alison J Rodger; Valentina Cambiano; Tina Bruun; Pietro Vernazza; Simon Collins; Jan van Lunzen; Giulio Maria Corbelli; Vicente Estrada; Anna Maria Geretti; Apostolos Beloukas; David Asboe; Pompeyo Viciana; Félix Gutiérrez; Bonaventura Clotet; Christian Pradier; Jan Gerstoft; Rainer Weber; Katarina Westling; Gilles Wandeler; Jan M Prins; Armin Rieger; Marcel Stoeckle; Tim Kümmerle; Teresa Bini; Adriana Ammassari; Richard Gilson; Ivanka Krznaric; Matti Ristola; Robert Zangerle; Pia Handberg; Antonio Antela; Sris Allan; Andrew N Phillips; Jens Lundgren Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James M Tesoriero; Britney L Johnson; Rachel Hart-Malloy; Jennifer L Cukrovany; Brenda L Moncur; Kathleen M Bogucki; Bridget J Anderson; Megan C Johnson Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2017 May/Jun
Authors: N N Abuelezam; A W McCormick; E D Surface; T Fussell; K A Freedberg; M Lipsitch; G R Seage Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Deron C Burton; Scott Burris; Jonathan H Mermin; David W Purcell; Sara C Zeigler; Lara Bull-Otterson; Hazel D Dean Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Thomas J O'Grady; James M Tesoriero; Yingchao Yuan; Thomas M Grisham; Seung Jun Seo; Charles J Gonzalez; Johanne E Morne Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-03-01