Literature DB >> 17571010

Quality-of-life weights for the US population: self-reported health status and priority health conditions, by demographic characteristics.

John A Nyman1, Nathan A Barleen, Bryan E Dowd, Daniel W Russell, Stephen Joel Coons, Patrick W Sullivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many of the large ongoing national surveys of the US population contain a question that asks for the respondent's self-reported health status: "excellent," "very good," "good," "fair," or "poor." These surveys could be used to conduct cost-utility analyses of health care policies, treatments or other interventions if quality-of-life (QOL) weights for the self-reported health statuses were also available.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to produce nationally representative QOL weights for self-reported health status and for 10 "priority" health conditions, by a series of demographic variables. RESEARCH
DESIGN: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey contains the questions from the EQ-5D health status measure. A recent study has calculated time-trade-off-derived QOL weights corresponding to the EQ-5D health states for a large sample of Americans. We use these data to construct QOL weights for the 5 self-reported health status categories and 10 priority health conditions, by a series of demographic variables.
RESULTS: Mean and median QOL weights were produced for self-reported health status, the 10 priority health conditions, and the demographic variables. We also report mean QOL weights for the self-reported health state and priority health conditions, by the demographic variables. Finally, ordinary least squares and censored least absolute deviation regression equations were used to estimate adjusted QOL weights for these variables.
CONCLUSIONS: By providing nationally representative QOL weights for self-reported health status and 10 priority health conditions, by demographic variable, we have facilitated the use of large national surveys for conducting cost-utility analysis and increased their value to researchers and policy makers.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17571010     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803dce05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  23 in total

1.  Associations among visual acuity and vision- and health-related quality of life among patients in the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Lea T Drye; John H Kempen; James P Dunn; Gary N Holland; Paul Latkany; Narsing A Rao; H Nida Sen; Elizabeth A Sugar; Jennifer E Thorne; Robert C Wang; Janet T Holbrook
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens in the World Health Organization's treatment guidelines: a South African analysis.

Authors:  Eran Bendavid; Philip Grant; Annie Talbot; Douglas K Owens; Andrew Zolopa
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  The cost-effectiveness of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in the United States in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Jessie L Juusola; Margaret L Brandeau; Douglas K Owens; Eran Bendavid
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cost-Effectiveness Study of Criteria for Screening Cerebrospinal Fluid To Determine the Need for Herpes Simplex Virus PCR Testing.

Authors:  Ronald G Hauser; Sheldon M Campbell; Cynthia A Brandt; Shiyi Wang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Sofosbuvir-based treatment regimens for chronic, genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection in U.S. incarcerated populations: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Shan Liu; Daena Watcha; Mark Holodniy; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  New protease inhibitors for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Shan Liu; Lauren E Cipriano; Mark Holodniy; Douglas K Owens; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Effect of race and socioeconomic status on cardiovascular risk factor burden: the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Georita M Frierson; Erica N Howard; Laura E DeFina; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Benjamin L Willis
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.847

8.  Personality and EQ-5D scores among individuals with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Benjamin P Chapman; Peter Franks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  A review of health utilities across conditions common in paediatric and adult populations.

Authors:  Jean-Eric Tarride; Natasha Burke; Matthias Bischof; Robert B Hopkins; Linda Goeree; Kaitryn Campbell; Feng Xie; Daria O'Reilly; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Socio-economic differences in the health-related quality of life impact of cardiovascular conditions.

Authors:  Mai Stafford; Michael Soljak; Victoria Pledge; Jennifer Mindell
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.