| Literature DB >> 22499190 |
Eduardo Madrigal-Santillán1, Sonia Fragoso-Antonio, Carmen Valadez-Vega, Gloria Solano-Solano, Clara Zúñiga Pérez, Manuel Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Jeannett A Izquierdo-Vega, José Gutiérrez-Salinas, Jaime Esquivel-Soto, César Esquivel-Chirino, Teresa Sumaya-Martínez, Tomas Fregoso-Aguilar, Jorge Mendoza-Pérez, José A Morales-González.
Abstract
There are few reports that demonstrate the antigenotoxic potential of cranberries. Although the types of berry fruits consumed worldwide are many, this paper focuses on cranberries that are commonly consumed in Mexico (Vaccinium macrocarpon species). The purpose of the present study is to determine whether cranberry ethanolic extract (CEE) can prevent the DNA damage produced by benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) using an in vivo mouse peripheral blood micronucleus assay. The experimental groups were organized as follows: a negative control group (without treatment), a positive group treated with B[a]P (200 mg/kg), a group administered with 800 mg/kg of CEE, and three groups treated with B[a]P and CEE (200, 400, and 800 mg/kg) respectively. The CEE and benzo[a]pyrene were administered orally for a week, on a daily basis. During this period the body weight, the feed intake, and the determination of antigenotoxic potential were quantified. At the end of this period, we continued with the same determinations for one week more (recovery period) but anymore administration of the substances. The animals treated with B[a]P showed a weight increase after the first week of administration. The same phenomenon was observed in the lots combined with B[a]P and CEE (low and medium doses). The dose of 800 mg/kg of CEE showed similar values to the control group at the end of the treatment period. In the second part of the assay, when the substances were not administered, these experimental groups regained their normal weight. The dose of CEE (800 mg/kg) was not genotoxic nor cytotoxic. On the contrary, the B[a]P increases the frequency of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes (MNNE) and reduces the rate of polychromatic erythrocytes (PE) at the end of the treatment period. With respect to the combined lots, a significant decrease in the MN rate was observed from the sixth to the eighth day of treatment with the two high doses applied; the highest protection (60%) was obtained with 800 mg/kg of CEE. The same dose showed an anticytotoxic effect which corresponded to an improvement of 62.5% in relation to the animals administered with the B[a]P. In the second period, all groups reached values that have been seen in the control group animals. Our results suggest that the inhibition of clastogenicity of the cranberry ethanolic extract against B[a]P is related to the antioxidant capacity of the combination of phytochemicals present in its chemical composition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22499190 PMCID: PMC6268607 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17044435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Weight gain (g) in mice treated with cranberry ethanolic extract (CEE) and benzo[a]pyrene (X ± SD).
| Day | Control | CEE 800 mg/kg | B[a]P 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 200 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 400 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 800 + 200 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment period | ||||||
| 0 | 23.39 ± 2.59 | 23.59 ± 1.29 | 23.29 ± 0.68 | 23.12 ± 0.83 | 23.62 ± 0.68 | 23.32 ± 1.50 |
| 1 | 25.55 ± 2.32 | 24.65 ± 1.93 | 24.75 ± 1.03 | 24.05 ± 0.72 | 24.05 ± 1.35 | 24.75 ± 0.84 |
| 2 | 26.05 ± 2.46 | 26.80 ± 1.79 | 25.66 ± 0.99 | 26.02 ± 0.71 | 25.99 ± 1.43 | 25.26 ± 0.82 |
| 3 | 26.79 ± 1.71 | 26.29 ± 1.99 | 26.66 ± 1.10 | 26.71 ± 0.86 | 26.29 ± 0.19 | 26.29 ± 0.38 |
| 4 | 27.02 ± 2.02 | 27.52 ± 1.94 | 27.02 ± 0.96 | 27.33 ± 0.87 | 27.41 ± 1.34 | 27.13 ± 0.63 |
| 5 | 27.14 ± 2.22 | 27.84 ± 1.96 | 27.91 ± 0.92 | 28.21 ± 1.33 | 27.91 ± 0.15 | 27.13 ± 0.63 |
| 6 | 28.69 ± 2.57 | 28.41 ± 1.80 | 29.70 ± 0.83 | 29.21 ± 1.07 | 29.21 ± 1.47 | 29.11 ± 0.16 |
| 7 | 29.21 ± 2.50 | 29.51 ± 1.84 | 30.83 ± 1.40 | 30.59 ± 0.37 | 29.33 ± 1.39 | 29.98 ± 0.20 |
| 8 | 29.98 ± 2.48 | 29.51 ± 1.88 | 31.99 ± 1.33 a | 31.23 ± 1.69 | 31.23 ± 1.11 | 30.02 ± 0.20 |
| Recovery period | ||||||
| 9 | 30.59 ± 2.82 | 30.78 ± 2.13 | 32.79 ± 1.51 a | 32.59 ± 1.54 a | 31.23 ± 1.11 | 30.83 ± 0.10 b |
| 10 | 31.69 ± 3.02 | 31.89 ± 2.83 | 33.13 ± 0.60 a | 32.79 ± 0.86 | 33.03 ± 1.25 | 31.89 ± 1.18 |
| 11 | 32.89 ± 3.10 | 32.33 ± 2.83 | 33.23 ± 1.26 | 33.63 ± 0.16 | 33.11 ± 1.15 | 32.40 ± 0.11 |
| 12 | 34.93 ± 3.10 | 34.79 ± 2.83 | 35.20 ± 0.26 | 35.02 ± 0.36 | 34.12 ± 1.05 | 34.50 ± 0.74 |
| 13 | 34.93 ± 3.14 | 35.20 ± 2.53 | 35.12 ± 1.16 | 35.50 ± 0.60 | 35.20 ± 0.21 | 34.50 ± 0.74 |
| 14 | 36.13 ± 3.25 | 35.93 ± 2.34 | 36.02 ± 1.21 | 36.02 ± 0.19 | 35.50 ± 0.12 | 35.93 ± 1.80 |
The weight of each mouse was determined daily during the all experiment; The data are average values for 6 animals/group; The letters show significant statistical differences as follows: a with respect to the control value, and b with respect to value in group treated with B[a]P. Analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer tests (a ≤ 0.05).
Food consumption (g) in mice treated with cranberry ethanolic extract (CEE) and benzo[a]pyrene (X ± SD).
| Day | Control | CEE 800 mg/kg | B[a]P 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 200 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 400 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 800 + 200 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment period | ||||||
| 0 | 2.91 ± 0.08 | 3.00 ± 0.0 | 2.82 ± 0.08 | 2.97 ± 0.12 | 3.07 ± 0.0 | 3.03 ± 0.01 |
| 1 | 2.98 ± 0.12 | 3.00 ± 0.07 | 3.05 ± 0.26 | 3.08 ± 0.36 | 3.10 ± 0.02 | 3.09 ± 0.08 |
| 2 | 3.03 ± 0.09 | 3.03 ± 0.04 | 3.06 ± 0.22 | 3.16 ± 0.09 | 3.17 ± 0.07 | 3.13 ± 0.14 |
| 3 | 3.13 ± 0.12 | 3.10 ± 0.07 | 3.19 ± 0.26 | 3.17 ± 0.11 | 3.19 ± 0.01 | 3.18 ± 0.17 |
| 4 | 3.25 ± 0.12 | 3.16 ± 0.07 | 3.20 ± 0.26 | 3.22 ± 0.11 | 3.19 ± 0.01 | 3.20 ± 0.26 |
| 5 | 3.35 ± 0.12 | 3.33 ± 0.07 | 3.30 ± 0.26 | 3.32 ± 0.11 | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 3.35 ± 0.17 |
| 6 | 3.50 ± 0.09 | 3.48 ± 0.26 | 3.69 ± 0.22 | 3.66 ± 0.09 | 3.44 ± 0.02 | 3.47 ± 0.04 |
| 7 | 3.57 ± 0.23 | 3.60 ± 0.08 | 3.82 ± 0.41 | 3.79 ± 0.05 | 3.52 ± 0.02 | 3.55 ± 0.04 |
| 8 | 4.02 ± 0.30 | 3.95 ± 0.26 b | 4.12 ± 0.22 ª | 4.12 ± 0.10 ª | 3.91 ± 0.01b | 3.90 ± 0.07 b |
| Recovery period | ||||||
| 9 | 4.07 ± 0.30 | 3.98 ± 0.26 | 4.12 ± 0.26 | 4.06 ± 0.30 | 3.99 ± 0.26 | 4.00 ± 0.17 |
| 10 | 4.08 ± 0.10 | 4.02 ± 0.04 | 4.10 ± 0.36 | 4.00 ± 0.14 | 4.03 ± 0.22 | 4.05 ± 0.05 |
| 11 | 4.06 ± 0.23 | 4.04 ± 0.23 | 4.09 ± 0.24 | 3.99 ± 0.17 | 4.04 ± 0.11 | 4.02 ± 0.07 |
| 12 | 4.00 ± 0.07 | 4.06 ± 0.01 | 4.05 ± 0.14 | 4.01 ± 0.04 | 4.02 ± 0.07 | 3.99 ± 0.12 |
| 13 | 3.99 ± 0.11 | 3.97 ± 0.10 | 3.98 ± 0.07 | 4.03 ± 0.07 | 3.98 ± 0.04 | 4.03 ± 0.01 |
| 14 | 4.02 ± 0.09 | 4.08 ± 0.02 | 4.00 ± 0.02 | 4.03 ± 0.0 | 4.00 ± 0.01 | 4.06 ± 0.02 |
The amount of food ingested was determined daily per cage by obtaining the difference in weight before and after each measurement; The data are average values for 6 animals/group; The letters show significant statistical differences as follows: a with respect to the control value, and b with respect to value in group treated with B[a]P. Analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer tests (a ≤ 0.05).
Frequency of normochromatic micronucleated erythrocytes in mice treated with CEE and benzo[a]pyrene (X ± SD).
| Day/hours | Control | CEE 800 mg/kg | B[a]P 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 200 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 400 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 800 + 200 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment period | ||||||
| 0/0 | 0.75 ± 0.34 | 0.66 ± 0.16 | 0.66 ± 0.21 | 0.83 ± 0.16 | 0.66 ± 0.21 | 0.66 ± 0.21 |
| 2/48 | 1.00 ± 0.21 | 0.16 ± 0.21 | 1.50 ± 0.56 | 1.33 ± 0.21 | 1.50 ± 0.21 | 1.33 ± 0.22 |
| 4/96 | 0.50 ± 0.21 | 0.16 ± 0.16 | 3.60 ± 0.42 a | 3.50 ± 0.22 | 3.00 ± 0.10 | 2.33 ± 0.16 b |
| 6/144 | 0.75 ± 0.34 | 0.50 ± 0.16 | 4.83 ± 0.30 a | 3.33 ± 0.22 b | 3.33 ± 0.16 b | 2.50 ± 0.25 b |
| 8/192 | 1.00 ± 0.36 | 1.00 ± 0.16 | 4.83 ± 0.33 a | 4.33 ± 0.22 b | 2.50 ± 0.21 b | 1.65 ± 0.33 b |
| Recovery period | ||||||
| 10/240 | 0.16 ± 0.40 | 0.16 ± 0.22 | 2.50 ± 0.21 a | 1.33 ± 0.42 b | 0.86 ± 0.56 b | 1.33 ± 0.16 b |
| 12/288 | 1.00 ± 0.21 | 1.00 ± 0.16 | 1.50 ± 0.42 | 0.16 ± 0.22 | 0.66 ± 0.21 | 0.66 ± 0.34 |
| 14/336 | 1.00 ± 0.34 | 0.83 ± 0.30 | 1.00 ± 0.56 | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 0.16 ± 0.16 | 0.50 ± 0.25 |
One thousand erythrocytes per animal stained with Giemsa were scored to determine the rate of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocyte rate; Values represent the mean ± S.D. of six mice per group; The letters show significant statistical differences as follows: a with respect to the control value, and b with respect to value in group treated with B[a]P. Analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer tests (a ≤ 0.05).
Relationship between the number of polycromatic erythrocytes with respect to the number of normochromatic erythrocytes (PE/NE index).
| Day/hours | Control | CEE 800 mg/kg | B[a]P 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 200 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 400 + 200 mg/kg | CEE + B[a]P 800 + 200 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment period | ||||||
| 0/0 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 0.012 ± 0.001 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 0.012 ± 0.001 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.009 ± 0.0009 |
| 2/48 | 0.008 ± 0.0008 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.008 | 0.008 ± 0.0009 | 0.008 ± 0.001 | 0.009 ± 0.0003 |
| 4/96 | 0.010 ± 0.0004 | 0.013 ± 0.002 | 0.003 ± 0.008 a | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.0009 b | 0.008 ± 0.0009 b |
| 6/144 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 0.013 ± 0.001 | 0.003 ± 0.0007 a | 0.005 ± 0.0005 | 0.004 ± 0.001 b | 0.008 ± 0.0002 b |
| 8/192 | 0.010 ± 0.0007 | 0.010 ± 0.0009 | 0.003 ± 0.0007 a | 0.004 ± 0.0006 b | 0.004 ± 0.001 b | 0.008 ± 0.001 b |
| Recovery period | ||||||
| 10/240 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.014 ± 0.0025 | 0.007 ± 0.001 a | 0.009 ± 0.001 | 0.010 ± 0.001 b | 0.009 ± 0.0009 |
| 12/288 | 0.010 ± 0.007 | 0.011 ± 0.009 | 0.011 ± 0.007 | 0.010 ± 0.006 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.008 ± 0.001 |
| 14/336 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.013 ± 0.001 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 0.012 ± 0.005 | 0.009 ± 0.0004 |
Mice treated with cranberry ethanolic extract (CEE) and benzo[a]pyrene (X ±SD); The amount of each type of erythrocyte was determined in 1,000 erythrocytes per animal using the Giemsa stain; Values represent the mean ± S.D. of six mice per group; The letters show significant statistical differences as follows: a with respect to the control value, and b with respect to value in group treated with B[a]P. Analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer tests (a ≤ 0.05).