Literature DB >> 22493764

Clinical and radiologic preoperative predicting factors for GB cholesterol polyp.

Hye-Lin Song1, Jun-Ho Shin, Hungdai Kim, Yong-Lai Park, Chang-Hak Yoo, Byung-Ho Son, Ji-Sup Yoon, Hyung-Ok Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use the clinical and radiological data to differentiate non-cholesterol versus cholesterol gall bladder (GB) polyps, which can be useful in deciding the treatment of the patient.
METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven patients underwent cholecystectomy for GB polyps of around 10 mm for 10 years, and were divided into two groups, cholesterol polyps (146 patients) and non-cholesterol polyps (41 patients) based on the postoperative pathological findings. Gender, age, body weight, height, body mass index (BMI), symptoms, laboratory findings, size, number of polyps, presence of GB stone and maximum diameter measured by preoperative ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT), and pathological diameter were subjected to comparative analysis.
RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with cholesterol polyps were younger in age and had higher BMI, and the total cholesterol levels and white blood cell levels were higher, but were not statistically significant. It was notable to see that 28.6% of the cholesterol polyps were not found in the preoperative CT yet the percentage of the undetectable rate was significantly lower (8%) in the non-cholesterol polyp group. There was a discrepancy in maximum diameters between the two radiological methods in both groups but the discrepancy was significantly larger in the cholesterol polyp group.
CONCLUSION: The clinical signs that can be helpful to diagnose whether it is a cholesterol polyp or not are younger patients who have high BMI, polyps which are detectable only on the USG and large maximum diameters between the USG and CT. And if the discrepancy of the maximum diameter is lesser than 1mm the polyp may be considered as a non-cholesterol polyp.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Cholesterol polyp; GB polyp; Gallbladder; Radiologic study

Year:  2012        PMID: 22493764      PMCID: PMC3319777          DOI: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.4.232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc        ISSN: 1226-0053


  29 in total

1.  [Gallbladder polyps: how should they be treated and when?].

Authors:  Elias Jirjoss Ilias
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.209

2.  Gallbladder polyps: when to wait and when to act.

Authors:  R A Boulton; D H Adams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of polypoid gall bladder lesions: analysis in surgical and follow up series.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Atomi; T Yamato
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  T Azuma; T Yoshikawa; T Araida; K Takasaki
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Carcinoma of the gallbladder: role of sonography in diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  M Pandey; B P Sood; R C Shukla; N C Aryya; S Singh; V K Shukla
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.910

6.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: diagnosis and indications for surgery.

Authors:  H L Yang; Y G Sun; Z Wang
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Surgical management of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

Authors:  K S Mainprize; S W Gould; J M Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  From the archives of the AFIP. Benign tumors and tumorlike lesions of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Authors:  Angela D Levy; Linda A Murakata; Robert M Abbott; Charles A Rohrmann
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Kit Fai Lee; John Wong; Jimmy Chak Man Li; Paul Bo San Lai
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Can endoscopic ultrasonography differentiate nonneoplastic from neoplastic gallbladder polyps?

Authors:  Tomotaka Akatsu; Koichi Aiura; Motohide Shimazu; Masakazu Ueda; Go Wakabayashi; Minoru Tanabe; Shigeyuki Kawachi; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography for gallbladder polyps: systematic review.

Authors:  Erin Martin; Richdeep Gill; Estifanos Debru
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Shu-Cheng Chou; Shih-Chin Chen; Yi-Ming Shyr; Shin-E Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  US characteristics for the prediction of neoplasm in gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger.

Authors:  Jin Sil Kim; Jeong Kyong Lee; Yookyung Kim; Sang Min Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.