Literature DB >> 16534690

Can endoscopic ultrasonography differentiate nonneoplastic from neoplastic gallbladder polyps?

Tomotaka Akatsu1, Koichi Aiura, Motohide Shimazu, Masakazu Ueda, Go Wakabayashi, Minoru Tanabe, Shigeyuki Kawachi, Masaki Kitajima.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to clarify the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features of nonneoplastic (cholesterol polyps and adenomyomatosis) and neoplastic (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) gallbladder polyps and to evaluate the effectiveness and limitation of EUS in the differential diagnosis of these lesions. We retrospectively compared EUS images with histologic findings in 29 surgical cases with gallbladder polyps with a diameter of 10 to 20 mm. Those cases were indicated for surgery based on the findings of a sessile appearance, a solitary lesion, low echogenicity, and/or a lobulated surface. Six of 10 cholesterol polyps were atypically seen as partially or completely hypoechoic due to predominant proliferation of glandular epithelia. Nine of 10 cholesterol polyps demonstrated an aggregation of hyperechoic spots, which represented multiple granules of cholesterosis. All adenomyomatoses (n = 10) showed multiple microcysts, which corresponded to proliferated Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses. However, three of nine neoplastic lesions (three adenomas and six adenocarcinomas) showed one of these signs due to concomitant cholesterosis (n = 2) or proliferated Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses (n = 1). In conclusion, 69% (20/29) of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm that were preoperatively suspected of malignancy were nonneoplastic. An aggregation of hyperechoic spots and multiple microcysts are considered to be important predictive factors for cholesterol polyps and adenomyomatosis, respectively. However, we should caution that these findings can also occur in neoplastic polyps when they contain a concomitant nonneoplastic component (cholesterosis or proliferated Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16534690     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-3146-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  24 in total

1.  Gallbladder polyps: when to wait and when to act.

Authors:  R A Boulton; D H Adams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Gallbladder cancer associated with cholesterosis.

Authors:  T Akiyama; H Sahara; K Seto; H Saitou; M Kiriyama; F Tomita; T Kosaka; I Kita; S Takashima; H Matsunou
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  T Azuma; T Yoshikawa; T Araida; K Takasaki
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: diagnosis and indications for surgery.

Authors:  H L Yang; Y G Sun; Z Wang
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Surgical management of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

Authors:  K S Mainprize; S W Gould; J M Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Ultrasonographic detection of early and curable carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  A Koga; S Yamauchi; Y Izumi; N Hamanaka
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Noninvasive carcinoma of the gallbladder arising in localized type adenomyomatosis.

Authors:  T Katoh; T Nakai; S Hayashi; T Satake
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. A premalignant lesion?

Authors:  M C Aldridge; F Gruffaz; D Castaing; H Bismuth
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  The difference in malignancy between pedunculated and sessile polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

Authors:  O Ishikawa; H Ohhigashi; S Imaoka; A Nakaizumi; T Kitamura; Y Sasaki; T Shibata; A Wada; T Iwanaga
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Relation of adenoma to carcinoma in the gallbladder.

Authors:  S Kozuka; N Tsubone; A Yasui; K Hachisuka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  17 in total

1.  Pre-operative factors that can predict neoplastic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Byung Hyo Cha; Jin-Hyeok Hwang; Sang Hyub Lee; Jang Eon Kim; Jai Young Cho; Haeryoung Kim; So Yeon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography needs to be considered when managing gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Daniel G French; Philippe D Allen; James C Ellsmere
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Negative signals for adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder upon diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2-weighted image fusion analysis.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Kazunori Fugo; Takafumi Sunaoshi; Eriko Sugiyama; Daisuke Kano; Misaki Shite; Ryouta Haga; Yoshiya Fukamizu; Satoshi Kagayama; Rumiko Hasegawa; Yoshinori Shirai; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Takashi Kishimoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Management strategies for gallbladder polyps: is it possible to predict malignant gallbladder polyps?

Authors:  Joo Kyung Park; Yong Bum Yoon; Yong-Tae Kim; Ji Kon Ryu; Won Jae Yoon; Sang Hyub Lee; Su-Jong Yu; Hae Yeon Kang; Jae Young Lee; Min Jung Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.519

5.  Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening.

Authors:  Hong Joo Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Seon Hyeong Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  A literature review of radiological findings to guide the diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Y Hammad; John T Miura; Kiran K Turaga; Fabian M Johnston; Mark D Hohenwalter; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Pre-operative predictive factors for gallbladder cholesterol polyps using conventional diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Choi; Jung-Won Yun; Yong-Sung Kim; Eun-A Lee; Sang-Tae Hwang; Yong-Kyun Cho; Hong-Joo Kim; Jung-Ho Park; Dong-Il Park; Chong-Il Sohn; Woo-Kyu Jeon; Byung-Ik Kim; Hyoung-Ook Kim; Jun-Ho Shin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  An unusual association of diffuse adenomyomatosis with dysplastic adenoma in chronic calculous cholecystitis: case presentation.

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo; Adriana Toro; Elia Pulvirenti; Monica Zisa; Antonio Galia
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Inflammatory Polyp of the Gallbladder Mimicking Early Polypoid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Seiya Susumu; Shigetoshi Matsuo; Ryuji Tsutsumi; Takashi Azuma; Shirou Obata; Tomayoshi Hayashi
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-28

Review 10.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of gallbladder diseases.

Authors:  Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri; Yoshiki Hirooka; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Pradermchai Kongkam; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.