Literature DB >> 22492641

Differential variability improves the identification of cancer risk markers in DNA methylation studies profiling precursor cancer lesions.

Andrew E Teschendorff1, Martin Widschwendter.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The standard paradigm in omic disciplines has been to identify biologically relevant biomarkers using statistics that reflect differences in mean levels of a molecular quantity such as mRNA expression or DNA methylation. Recently, however, it has been proposed that differential epigenetic variability may mark genes that contribute to the risk of complex genetic diseases like cancer and that identification of risk and early detection markers may therefore benefit from statistics based on differential variability.
RESULTS: Using four genome-wide DNA methylation datasets totalling 311 epithelial samples and encompassing all stages of cervical carcinogenesis, we here formally demonstrate that differential variability, as a criterion for selecting DNA methylation features, can identify cancer risk markers more reliably than statistics based on differences in mean methylation. We show that differential variability selects features with heterogeneous outlier methylation profiles and that these play a key role in the early stages of carcinogenesis. Moreover, differentially variable features identified in precursor non-invasive lesions exhibit significantly increased enrichment for developmental genes compared with differentially methylated sites. Conversely, differential variability does not add predictive value in cancer studies profiling invasive tumours or whole-blood tissue. Finally, we incorporate the differential variability feature selection step into a novel adaptive index prediction algorithm called EVORA (epigenetic variable outliers for risk prediction analysis), and demonstrate that EVORA compares favourably to powerful prediction algorithms based on differential methylation statistics.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistics based on differential variability improve the detection of cancer risk markers in the context of DNA methylation studies profiling epithelial preinvasive neoplasias. We present a novel algorithm (EVORA) which could be used for prediction and diagnosis of precursor epithelial cancer lesions. AVAILABILITY: R-scripts implementing EVORA are available from CRAN (www.r-project.org).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492641     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  50 in total

1.  The epigenetic basis of common human disease.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Recommendations for the design and analysis of epigenome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Karin B Michels; Alexandra M Binder; Sarah Dedeurwaerder; Charles B Epstein; John M Greally; Ivo Gut; E Andres Houseman; Benedetta Izzi; Karl T Kelsey; Alexander Meissner; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Kimberly D Siegmund; Christoph Bock; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Genetic Determinants of Epigenetic Patterns: Providing Insight into Disease.

Authors:  Emma Cazaly; Jac Charlesworth; Joanne L Dickinson; Adele F Holloway
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 4.  Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data.

Authors:  Christoph Bock
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Epigenetic stochasticity, nuclear structure and cancer: the implications for medicine.

Authors:  A P Feinberg
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 6.  Epigenome-based cancer risk prediction: rationale, opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Martin Widschwendter; Allison Jones; Iona Evans; Daniel Reisel; Joakim Dillner; Karin Sundström; Ewout W Steyerberg; Yvonne Vergouwe; Odette Wegwarth; Felix G Rebitschek; Uwe Siebert; Gaby Sroczynski; Inez D de Beaufort; Ineke Bolt; David Cibula; Michal Zikan; Line Bjørge; Nicoletta Colombo; Nadia Harbeck; Frank Dudbridge; Anne-Marie Tasse; Bartha M Knoppers; Yann Joly; Andrew E Teschendorff; Nora Pashayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  A powerful statistical method for identifying differentially methylated markers in complex diseases.

Authors:  Surin Ahn; Tao Wang
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2013

8.  Differential distribution improves gene selection stability and has competitive classification performance for patient survival.

Authors:  Dario Strbenac; Graham J Mann; Jean Y H Yang; John T Ormerod
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Variance Function Partially Linear Single-Index Models1.

Authors:  Heng Lian; Hua Liang; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 10.  Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg; Michael A Koldobskiy; Anita Göndör
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.