Literature DB >> 27190235

Differential distribution improves gene selection stability and has competitive classification performance for patient survival.

Dario Strbenac1, Graham J Mann2, Jean Y H Yang1, John T Ormerod3.   

Abstract

A consistent difference in average expression level, often referred to as differential expression (DE), has long been used to identify genes useful for classification. However, recent cancer studies have shown that when transcription factors or epigenetic signals become deregulated, a change in expression variability (DV) of target genes is frequently observed. This suggests that assessing the importance of genes by either differential expression or variability alone potentially misses sets of important biomarkers that could lead to improved predictions and treatments. Here, we describe a new approach for assessing the importance of genes based on differential distribution (DD), which combines information from differential expression and differential variability into a unified metric. We show that feature ranking and selection stability based on DD can perform two to three times better than DE or DV alone, and that DD yields equivalent error rates to DE and DV. Finally, assessing genes via differential distribution produces a complementary set of selected genes to DE and DV, potentially opening up new categories of biomarkers.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27190235      PMCID: PMC5291264          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  31 in total

1.  Diagnostic classification of schizophrenia by neural network analysis of blood-based gene expression signatures.

Authors:  Makoto Takahashi; Hiroshi Hayashi; Yuichiro Watanabe; Kazushi Sawamura; Naoki Fukui; Junzo Watanabe; Tsuyoshi Kitajima; Yoshio Yamanouchi; Nakao Iwata; Katsuyoshi Mizukami; Takafumi Hori; Kazutaka Shimoda; Hiroshi Ujike; Norio Ozaki; Kentarou Iijima; Kazuo Takemura; Hideyuki Aoshima; Toshiyuki Someya
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Genetic variants contribute to gene expression variability in humans.

Authors:  Amanda M Hulse; James J Cai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Using high-throughput transcriptomic data for prognosis: a critical overview and perspectives.

Authors:  Eytan Domany
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Molecular staging for survival prediction of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Steven Eschrich; Ivana Yang; Greg Bloom; Ka Yin Kwong; David Boulware; Alan Cantor; Domenico Coppola; Mogens Kruhøffer; Lauri Aaltonen; Torben F Orntoft; John Quackenbush; Timothy J Yeatman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Determination of prognosis in metastatic melanoma through integration of clinico-pathologic, mutation, mRNA, microRNA, and protein information.

Authors:  Kaushala Jayawardana; Sarah-Jane Schramm; Lauren Haydu; John F Thompson; Richard A Scolyer; Graham J Mann; Samuel Müller; Jean Yee Hwa Yang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Prognostic gene signatures for patient stratification in breast cancer: accuracy, stability and interpretability of gene selection approaches using prior knowledge on protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Yupeng Cun; Holger Fröhlichholger Fröhlich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Multivariate classification of urine metabolome profiles for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Younghoon Kim; Imhoi Koo; Byung Hwa Jung; Bong Chul Chung; Doheon Lee
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Discovery of genetic biomarkers contributing to variation in drug response of cytidine analogues using human lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  Liang Li; Brooke L Fridley; Krishna Kalari; Nifang Niu; Gregory Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Ryan P Abo; Daniel Schaid; Liewei Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  5 in total

1.  Computational approaches for direct cell reprogramming: from the bulk omics era to the single cell era.

Authors:  Andy Tran; Pengyi Yang; Jean Y H Yang; John Ormerod
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.840

2.  Identification of differentially distributed gene expression and distinct sets of cancer-related genes identified by changes in mean and variability.

Authors:  Aedan G K Roberts; Daniel R Catchpoole; Paul J Kennedy
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-14

3.  scClassify: sample size estimation and multiscale classification of cells using single and multiple reference.

Authors:  Yingxin Lin; Yue Cao; Hani Jieun Kim; Agus Salim; Terence P Speed; David M Lin; Pengyi Yang; Jean Yee Hwa Yang
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 11.429

4.  Adaptively capturing the heterogeneity of expression for cancer biomarker identification.

Authors:  Xin-Ping Xie; Yu-Feng Xie; Yi-Tong Liu; Hong-Qiang Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Novel CSF biomarkers to discriminate FTLD and its pathological subtypes.

Authors:  Marta Del Campo; Daniela Galimberti; Naura Elias; Lynn Boonkamp; Yolande A Pijnenburg; John C van Swieten; Kelly Watts; Silvia Paciotti; Tommaso Beccari; William Hu; Charlotte E Teunissen
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.511

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.